public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* "bitbake -c fetchall" doesn't process EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS
@ 2013-01-29  9:41 Robert P. J. Day
  2013-01-30 13:02 ` Richard Purdie
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2013-01-29  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OE Core mailing list


  back in november, i whined thusly:

http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-November/031997.html

is this the *intended* behaviour?  since it seems that if i do a
"bitbake -c fetchall", i should expect that i now have *all* software
related to my target, and that's clearly not the case here.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: "bitbake -c fetchall" doesn't process EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS
  2013-01-29  9:41 "bitbake -c fetchall" doesn't process EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS Robert P. J. Day
@ 2013-01-30 13:02 ` Richard Purdie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2013-01-30 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: OE Core mailing list

On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 04:41 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   back in november, i whined thusly:
> 
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-November/031997.html
> 
> is this the *intended* behaviour?  since it seems that if i do a
> "bitbake -c fetchall", i should expect that i now have *all* software
> related to my target, and that's clearly not the case here.

Someone filed a bug in bugzilla about this. Bitbake is behaving as
intended and likely there is missing dependency information in the
fetchall case. This is a metadata level problem, not a bitbake one.

Patches naturally welcome to add the correct dependency information.

Cheers,

Richard




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-30 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-29  9:41 "bitbake -c fetchall" doesn't process EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS Robert P. J. Day
2013-01-30 13:02 ` Richard Purdie

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox