From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Poor first impression
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 23:56:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369177001.3843.9.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519BB951.2040502@mlbassoc.com>
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 12:13 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-05-21 03:10, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 07:26 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> I just tried to run Poky/Yocto on a fresh Ubuntu 12.04 system. I knew there would
> >> be missing bits and have seen the "sanity" messages in the past, so I thought I'd
> >> just carry on. Today's experience was not pretty and would it not for my experience
> >> with this, I would have been very perplexed...
> >
> > There are two issues there, firstly the scripts/bitbake binary is doing
> > a really bad job, secondly, one of the improved debugging patches I
> > added to bitbake, regressed things in this case.
> >
> > I posted a patch to bitbake last night, I've just posted a fix for
> > scripts/bitbake now. These two together should improve this. I agree
> > that particular error would create a poor first impression, thanks for
> > reporting it.
>
> With this patch, no 'git' and a fresh build I still get this:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 293, in <module>
> ret = main()
> File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 260, in main
> event = server.event_queue.get(block=False)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 104, in get
> raise Empty
> Empty
> Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main build
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 293, in <module>
> ret = main()
> File "/home/local/poky-multi/bitbake/bin/bitbake", line 260, in main
> event = server.event_queue.get(block=False)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 104, in get
> raise Empty
> Empty
> ERROR: OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential misconfiguration.
> Either fix the cause of this error or at your own risk disable the checker (see sanity.conf).
> Following is the list of potential problems / advisories:
>
> Please install the following missing utilities: git
>
> Still not very pretty.
Did you apply both patches, the one for bitbake and the one for OE-Core?
This looks like the bitbake one is missing.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-17 13:26 Poor first impression Gary Thomas
2013-05-17 14:18 ` Saul Wold
2013-05-17 14:23 ` Gary Thomas
2013-05-17 14:32 ` Burton, Ross
2013-05-17 15:03 ` Gary Thomas
2013-05-21 9:10 ` Richard Purdie
2013-05-21 18:13 ` Gary Thomas
2013-05-21 22:56 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-05-22 11:57 ` Gary Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369177001.3843.9.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox