Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:17:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375114624.5851.5.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6339709.CFmXEXRQnE@helios>

On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:49 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 29 July 2013 08:07:51 Saul Wold wrote:
> > Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the
> > obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not
> > show up in the summary below (in the first email).
> > 
> > Already basicly ACK'ed by Ross and Paul
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sau!
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1:
> > 
> >   external-sourcery: add missing providers (2013-07-27 23:28:29 -0700)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage2
> >  
> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/
> > stage2
> > 
> > Andrei Dinu (1):
> >   libpng : upgrade to 1.6.3
> > 
> > Emilia Ciobanu (14):
> >   babeltrace: fix recipe name
> >   build-appliance-image: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   chkconfig-alternatives-native: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to
> >     PV variable
> >   connman-gnome: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native: fix recipe name
> >   docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native: fix recipe name
> >   hwlatdetect: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   lttng-ust: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   mtd-utils: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   neard: fix recipe name
> >   rt-tests: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
> >   update-rc.d: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
> 
> Some of these patches were meant to be dropped... so no ack from me.

This really isn't filling me with confidence...

Cheers,

Richard



  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-29 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-29 15:07 [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set Saul Wold
2013-07-29 15:27 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-29 15:49 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-29 16:17   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2013-07-29 16:20     ` Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1375114624.5851.5.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox