From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:20:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F6963C.1010009@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375114624.5851.5.camel@ted>
On 07/29/2013 09:17 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:49 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Monday 29 July 2013 08:07:51 Saul Wold wrote:
>>> Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the
>>> obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not
>>> show up in the summary below (in the first email).
>>>
>>> Already basicly ACK'ed by Ross and Paul
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sau!
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1:
>>>
>>> external-sourcery: add missing providers (2013-07-27 23:28:29 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/stage2
>>>
>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/
>>> stage2
>>>
>>> Andrei Dinu (1):
>>> libpng : upgrade to 1.6.3
>>>
>>> Emilia Ciobanu (14):
>>> babeltrace: fix recipe name
>>> build-appliance-image: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> chkconfig-alternatives-native: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to
>>> PV variable
>>> connman-gnome: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native: fix recipe name
>>> docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native: fix recipe name
>>> hwlatdetect: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> lttng-ust: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> mtd-utils: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> neard: fix recipe name
>>> rt-tests: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable
>>> update-rc.d: fix recipe name and add GIT revision to PV variable
>>
>> Some of these patches were meant to be dropped... so no ack from me.
>
> This really isn't filling me with confidence...
>
Sorry, I rushed this morning, the v2 and sgw/stage2 is correct now, and
should only have 14 patches.
Sau!
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 15:07 [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set Saul Wold
2013-07-29 15:27 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-29 15:49 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-29 16:17 ` Richard Purdie
2013-07-29 16:20 ` Saul Wold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F6963C.1010009@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox