Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6 v3] binutils: Ensure old -symlinks packages get removed
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:19:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384352346-12891-2-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1384305535.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com>

When the -symlinks package was removed and an RPROVIDES was added, nothing
was put in to cause the removal of the older package in an upgrade.

Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
index 17c66bc..77b3718 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = " \
 	${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/bin/*"
 
 RPROVIDES_${PN} += "${PN}-symlinks"
+RREPLACES_${PN} += "${PN}-symlinks"
+RCONFLICTS_${PN} += "${PN}-symlinks"
 
 FILES_${PN}-dev = " \
 	${includedir} \
-- 
1.8.3.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13  1:23 [PATCH 0/6] Misc changes relating to toolchain and image gen Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] gcc: Use alternatives for the *-symlinks packages Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  2:24   ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-13  2:27     ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  2:28       ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] gcc: Drop *-symlinks Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] binutils: Ensure old -symlinks packages get removed Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  8:12   ` Martin Jansa
2013-11-13 11:14     ` Phil Blundell
2013-11-13 13:39       ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-13 13:44         ` Phil Blundell
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] packagegroups: Remove toolchain *-symlinks packages Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] packagegroup-self-hosted: Use packagegroup-core-buildessentials Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] package_rpm: Allow translation of requirement to package name Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:33 ` [PATCH 0/6] Misc changes relating to toolchain and image gen Otavio Salvador
2013-11-13  2:01   ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  3:42     ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:59 ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] packagegroup-self-hosted: Use packagegroup-core-buildessential Mark Hatle
2013-11-13  1:59 ` [PATCH 6/6 v2] package_rpm: Allow translation of requirement to package name Mark Hatle
2013-11-13 10:33   ` Paul Eggleton
2013-11-13 12:31     ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-13 13:12     ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-15 14:02   ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-15 17:15     ` Mark Hatle
2013-11-13 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/6 v3] gcc: Drop *-symlinks Mark Hatle
2013-11-13 14:19 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2013-11-19  0:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] Misc changes relating to toolchain and image gen Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384352346-12891-2-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox