From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] qt4: fix compile error in Qt 4.8.0 with gcc 4.6
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:56:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1440799.NqLiKZanR0@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1spuyaA4ZJTe1pH8qyRA0nXQfJ67hAKjs5daf_Lmxy=8Tg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:19:22 Khem Raj wrote:
> since there is a namespace conflict that should be fixed IMO removing
> Wrror is not quite the right thing to do here IMO.
So removing -Werror is somewhat heavy-handed, yes; perhaps we can simply
add -Wno-error=c++0x-compat and mark this patch as inappropriate for
upstreaming instead?
> Its a workaround but probably upstream wont
> accept it. So change nullptr here to something like qt_nullptr in source
> tree
What the code is attempting to do is provide its own "nullptr" if it isn't
being provided as part of the language:
------------------------------
#if __has_feature(cxx_nullptr) || (GCC_VERSION_AT_LEAST(4, 6, 0) && defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__)) || (defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER >= 1600 && !COMPILER(INTEL))
#define HAVE_NULLPTR 1
#else
namespace std {
class nullptr_t { };
}
extern std::nullptr_t nullptr;
#endif
------------------------------
gcc 4.6 is preempting this and complaining about the use of the identifier. I
don't think renaming it is going to be acceptable upstream either.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 17:57 [RFC PATCH 0/4] qmake/qt4-tools-nativesdk fixes Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] qt4: fix compile error in Qt 4.8.0 with gcc 4.6 Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 21:19 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-10 13:56 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-02-10 14:03 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-10 14:09 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-10 19:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-10 20:36 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-09 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] qt4: build qmake for the target Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 18:18 ` Koen Kooi
2012-02-09 18:22 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] qt4-tools-nativesdk: fix build of 4.7.4 Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] qt4-tools-nativesdk: improve and tidy up qmake build Paul Eggleton
2012-02-09 18:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] qmake/qt4-tools-nativesdk fixes Otavio Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1440799.NqLiKZanR0@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox