From: Benjamin Esquivel <benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] populate SDK: prepare calling of bb.utils for exceptions
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:27:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445027247.6970.32.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620A07B.3050305@topic.nl>
Hello Mike, comments below:
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 09:00 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 15-10-15 19:27, Benjamin Esquivel wrote:
> > bb.utils.remove, bb.utils.movefile and bb.utils.mkdirhier can throw
> > exceptions that need handling and proper error messages.
> >
> > [YOCTO#8213]
> ...
> > + def mkdirhier(self, dirpath):
> > + try:
> > + bb.utils.mkdirhier(dirpath)
> > + except OSError as e:
> > + bb.warn(str(e))
> > + bb.error("cannot make dir for SDK:
> > {}".format(dirpath))
> ...
>
>
> I see two bad things happening here:
>
> - This will print a message, but continue processing as if nothing
> bad
> happened, wreaking havoc later on when the caller might expect the
> directory
> to actually exist and raise exceptions that are much harder to solve.
The exception is not re-raised since this is the appropriate level of
handling and you made me realize that this specific case will only be
reached if the dir is not present and unable to be created so it should
be changed for a bb.fatal instead of bb.error. thanks.
>
> - It loses the information in the original exception, and since it
> doesn't
> throw a new exception, the user is now left in the dark as to where
> the
> problem occured, since there's no stack trace now.
>
I will throw the trace to the log
>
> For what I see in this code, it will actually make thing worse by
> hiding
> errors and obscuring information. You're not "handling" the exception
> here,
> you're almost "ignoring" them, which isn't quite the same.
>
not agreed, current code hides errors in return codes which are not
even checked.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
>
> TOPIC Embedded Products
> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
> E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-16 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 17:27 [PATCH] populate SDK: prepare calling of bb.utils for exceptions Benjamin Esquivel
2015-10-16 2:15 ` Christopher Larson
2015-10-16 20:28 ` Benjamin Esquivel
2015-10-16 21:50 ` [PATCH V2] " Benjamin Esquivel
2015-10-19 5:27 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-10-19 15:28 ` [PATCH V3] " Benjamin Esquivel
2015-10-16 7:00 ` [PATCH] " Mike Looijmans
2015-10-16 20:27 ` Benjamin Esquivel [this message]
2015-10-16 10:01 ` Richard Purdie
2015-10-16 20:18 ` Benjamin Esquivel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445027247.6970.32.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox