Re: [PATCH] bootimg/image: Enhance bootimg to respect RM_OLD_IMAGE

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 17:34 -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> [Resending from an email subscribed to the oe list...]
> On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 11:16 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > @@ -294,7 +286,10 @@ python do_bootimg() {
> >          bb.build.exec_func('build_efi_cfg', d)
> >      bb.build.exec_func('build_hddimg', d)
> >      bb.build.exec_func('build_iso', d)
> > +    bb.build.exec_func('create_symlinks', d)
> When I try to use bootimg.bbclass I get the following warning:
> 
> WARNING: Function create_symlinks doesn't exist
> 
> This is because create_symlinks is defined in image.bbclass but
> bootimg.bbclass does not inherit from it. Should it be the case? Or
> the
> definiton of create_symlinks should be moved to a separate file?

I guess the key question is whether anyone is using bootimg.bbclass
without using image.bbclass, or whether that is even
possible/practical?

Was this an existing setup that broke?

Cheers,

Richard