From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: paul.eggleton@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:52:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454921553.16142.42.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454914617-2042-1-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com>
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 07:56 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
> updates information. Information is never removed.
>
> Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
> recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
> example when the invocation does a full world build.
>
> This is now possible by invoking bitbake with:
> BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
> BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
>
> In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
> information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
> history directory. There the information is used for the "version
> going backwards QA check". Then when the build is complete and before
> (potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets
> deleted.
>
> Because information that has not changed during the build will be
> reconstructed, a git log will then only show real updates, additions
> and removals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
The implicit assumption here is that you'd only every build large
targets like "world". A "bitbake bash" isn't really going to do what
you'd expect/want.
I think we need to make that clearer in the comments and that this is
only useful on automated infrastructure.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-08 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 6:56 [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request Patrick Ohly
2016-02-08 8:52 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2016-02-08 12:35 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-02-10 12:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2016-02-12 8:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454921553.16142.42.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=paul.eggleton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox