* [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
@ 2016-02-08 6:56 Patrick Ohly
2016-02-08 8:52 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2016-02-08 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: paul.eggleton
buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
updates information. Information is never removed.
Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
example when the invocation does a full world build.
This is now possible by invoking bitbake with:
BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
history directory. There the information is used for the "version
going backwards QA check". Then when the build is complete and before
(potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets deleted.
Because information that has not changed during the build will be
reconstructed, a git log will then only show real updates, additions
and removals.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
---
meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
index 3c4647a..1fadd2e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ BUILDHISTORY_FEATURES ?= "image package sdk"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/buildhistory"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_IMAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/images/${MACHINE_ARCH}/${TCLIBC}/${IMAGE_BASENAME}"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_PACKAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/packages/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"
+# Setting this to non-empty will remove the old content of the buildhistory as part of
+# the current bitbake invocation and replace it with information about what was built
+# during the build.
+BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD ?= ""
+BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/${@ "old" if "${BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD}" else ""}"
+BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR_PACKAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR}/packages/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_SDK = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/sdk/${SDK_NAME}${SDK_EXT}/${IMAGE_BASENAME}"
BUILDHISTORY_IMAGE_FILES ?= "/etc/passwd /etc/group"
BUILDHISTORY_SDK_FILES ?= "conf/local.conf conf/bblayers.conf conf/auto.conf conf/locked-sigs.inc conf/devtool.conf"
@@ -49,6 +55,7 @@ python buildhistory_emit_pkghistory() {
import errno
pkghistdir = d.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_DIR_PACKAGE', True)
+ oldpkghistdir = d.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR_PACKAGE', True)
class RecipeInfo:
def __init__(self, name):
@@ -139,7 +146,7 @@ python buildhistory_emit_pkghistory() {
def getlastpkgversion(pkg):
try:
- histfile = os.path.join(pkghistdir, pkg, "latest")
+ histfile = os.path.join(oldpkghistdir, pkg, "latest")
return readPackageInfo(pkg, histfile)
except EnvironmentError:
return None
@@ -722,17 +729,35 @@ END
python buildhistory_eventhandler() {
if e.data.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_FEATURES', True).strip():
- if e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT", True) == "1":
- bb.note("Writing buildhistory")
- localdata = bb.data.createCopy(e.data)
- localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_FAILURES', str(e._failures))
- interrupted = getattr(e, '_interrupted', 0)
- localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_INTERRUPTED', str(interrupted))
- bb.build.exec_func("buildhistory_commit", localdata)
+ remove = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD", True)
+ olddir = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR", True)
+ if isinstance(e, bb.event.BuildStarted):
+ if remove:
+ import shutil
+ # Clean up after potentially interrupted build.
+ if os.path.isdir(olddir):
+ shutil.rmtree(olddir)
+ rootdir = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_DIR", True)
+ entries = [ x for x in os.listdir(rootdir) if not x.startswith('.') ]
+ bb.utils.mkdirhier(olddir)
+ for entry in entries:
+ os.rename(os.path.join(rootdir, entry),
+ os.path.join(olddir, entry))
+ elif isinstance(e, bb.event.BuildCompleted):
+ if remove:
+ import shutil
+ shutil.rmtree(olddir)
+ if e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT", True) == "1":
+ bb.note("Writing buildhistory")
+ localdata = bb.data.createCopy(e.data)
+ localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_FAILURES', str(e._failures))
+ interrupted = getattr(e, '_interrupted', 0)
+ localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_INTERRUPTED', str(interrupted))
+ bb.build.exec_func("buildhistory_commit", localdata)
}
addhandler buildhistory_eventhandler
-buildhistory_eventhandler[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted"
+buildhistory_eventhandler[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted bb.event.BuildStarted"
# FIXME this ought to be moved into the fetcher
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
2016-02-08 6:56 [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request Patrick Ohly
@ 2016-02-08 8:52 ` Richard Purdie
2016-02-08 12:35 ` Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2016-02-08 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Ohly, openembedded-core; +Cc: paul.eggleton
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 07:56 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
> updates information. Information is never removed.
>
> Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
> recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
> example when the invocation does a full world build.
>
> This is now possible by invoking bitbake with:
> BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
> BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
>
> In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
> information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
> history directory. There the information is used for the "version
> going backwards QA check". Then when the build is complete and before
> (potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets
> deleted.
>
> Because information that has not changed during the build will be
> reconstructed, a git log will then only show real updates, additions
> and removals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
The implicit assumption here is that you'd only every build large
targets like "world". A "bitbake bash" isn't really going to do what
you'd expect/want.
I think we need to make that clearer in the comments and that this is
only useful on automated infrastructure.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
2016-02-08 8:52 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2016-02-08 12:35 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-02-10 12:31 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2016-02-08 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: paul.eggleton, openembedded-core
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 07:56 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
> > updates information. Information is never removed.
> >
> > Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
> > recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
> > example when the invocation does a full world build.
> >
> > This is now possible by invoking bitbake with:
> > BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
> > BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
> >
> > In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
> > information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
> > history directory. There the information is used for the "version
> > going backwards QA check". Then when the build is complete and before
> > (potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets
> > deleted.
> >
> > Because information that has not changed during the build will be
> > reconstructed, a git log will then only show real updates, additions
> > and removals.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
>
> The implicit assumption here is that you'd only every build large
> targets like "world". A "bitbake bash" isn't really going to do what
> you'd expect/want.
Yes, I know. I think the "reduce the information only to those recipes
that were built during a specific bitbake invocation" is a bit clearer
about that than the last paragraph, which assumes a full build.
> I think we need to make that clearer in the comments and that this is
> only useful on automated infrastructure.
I wouldn't say that. One could do "BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
<something> && bitbake <something else> && bitbake <even more>", and
that would work fine also when doing manual builds. The drawback in that
case is that the version-going-backwards check does not work for
<something else> and <even more>.
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to replace BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
with "BUILDHISTORY_RESET"?
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
2016-02-08 12:35 ` Patrick Ohly
@ 2016-02-10 12:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2016-02-12 8:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2016-02-10 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core, Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:35:20 Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 08:52 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 07:56 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
> > > updates information. Information is never removed.
> > >
> > > Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
> > > recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
> > > example when the invocation does a full world build.
> > >
> > > This is now possible by invoking bitbake with:
> > > BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
> > >
> > > BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
I think you'd be more likely to just set this in the auto.conf created by the
CI infrastructure, but of course there's nothing to stop you doing it this
way.
> > > In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
> > > information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
> > > history directory. There the information is used for the "version
> > > going backwards QA check". Then when the build is complete and before
> > > (potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets
> > > deleted.
> > >
> > > Because information that has not changed during the build will be
> > > reconstructed, a git log will then only show real updates, additions
> > > and removals.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
> >
> > The implicit assumption here is that you'd only every build large
> > targets like "world". A "bitbake bash" isn't really going to do what
> > you'd expect/want.
>
> Yes, I know. I think the "reduce the information only to those recipes
> that were built during a specific bitbake invocation" is a bit clearer
> about that than the last paragraph, which assumes a full build.
>
> > I think we need to make that clearer in the comments and that this is
> > only useful on automated infrastructure.
>
> I wouldn't say that. One could do "BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD=1 bitbake
> <something> && bitbake <something else> && bitbake <even more>", and
> that would work fine also when doing manual builds. The drawback in that
> case is that the version-going-backwards check does not work for
> <something else> and <even more>.
>
> Perhaps it would be more appropriate to replace BUILDHISTORY_REMOVE_OLD
> with "BUILDHISTORY_RESET"?
FWIW, I'm reasonably happy with this if we add the suggested comments and
rename the variable to BUILDHISTORY_RESET.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request
2016-02-10 12:31 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2016-02-12 8:37 ` Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2016-02-12 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: paul.eggleton
buildhistory.bbclass by design is incremental: each build adds or
updates information. Information is never removed.
Sometimes it can be useful to reduce the information only to those
recipes that were build during a specific bitbake invocation, for
example when the invocation does a full world build.
This is now possible by setting BUILDHISTORY_RESET as explained in the
modified class. The comment on the variable also mentions the caveats
associated with using this mode.
In this mode, buildhistory.bbclass first moves all existing
information into a temporary directory called "old" inside the build
history directory. There the information is used for the "version
going backwards" QA check. Then when the build is complete and before
(potentially) committing to git, the temporary directory gets deleted.
Because information that has not changed during the build will be
reconstructed during full world rebuilds, a git log will then only
show real updates, additions and removals.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
---
meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
index 3c4647a..b18fb84 100644
--- a/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass
@@ -11,6 +11,29 @@ BUILDHISTORY_FEATURES ?= "image package sdk"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/buildhistory"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_IMAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/images/${MACHINE_ARCH}/${TCLIBC}/${IMAGE_BASENAME}"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_PACKAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/packages/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"
+
+# Setting this to non-empty will remove the old content of the buildhistory as part of
+# the current bitbake invocation and replace it with information about what was built
+# during the build.
+#
+# This is meant to be used in continuous integration (CI) systems when invoking bitbake
+# for full world builds. The effect in that case is that information about packages
+# that no longer get build also gets removed from the buildhistory, which is not
+# the case otherwise.
+#
+# The advantage over manually cleaning the buildhistory outside of bitbake is that
+# the "version-going-backwards" check still works. When relying on that, be careful
+# about failed world builds: they will lead to incomplete information in the
+# buildhistory because information about packages that could not be built will
+# also get removed. A CI system should handle that by discarding the buildhistory
+# of failed builds.
+#
+# The expected usage is via auto.conf, but passing via the command line also works
+# with: BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE=BUILDHISTORY_RESET BUILDHISTORY_RESET=1
+BUILDHISTORY_RESET ?= ""
+
+BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/${@ "old" if "${BUILDHISTORY_RESET}" else ""}"
+BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR_PACKAGE = "${BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR}/packages/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}"
BUILDHISTORY_DIR_SDK = "${BUILDHISTORY_DIR}/sdk/${SDK_NAME}${SDK_EXT}/${IMAGE_BASENAME}"
BUILDHISTORY_IMAGE_FILES ?= "/etc/passwd /etc/group"
BUILDHISTORY_SDK_FILES ?= "conf/local.conf conf/bblayers.conf conf/auto.conf conf/locked-sigs.inc conf/devtool.conf"
@@ -49,6 +72,7 @@ python buildhistory_emit_pkghistory() {
import errno
pkghistdir = d.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_DIR_PACKAGE', True)
+ oldpkghistdir = d.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR_PACKAGE', True)
class RecipeInfo:
def __init__(self, name):
@@ -139,7 +163,7 @@ python buildhistory_emit_pkghistory() {
def getlastpkgversion(pkg):
try:
- histfile = os.path.join(pkghistdir, pkg, "latest")
+ histfile = os.path.join(oldpkghistdir, pkg, "latest")
return readPackageInfo(pkg, histfile)
except EnvironmentError:
return None
@@ -722,17 +746,35 @@ END
python buildhistory_eventhandler() {
if e.data.getVar('BUILDHISTORY_FEATURES', True).strip():
- if e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT", True) == "1":
- bb.note("Writing buildhistory")
- localdata = bb.data.createCopy(e.data)
- localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_FAILURES', str(e._failures))
- interrupted = getattr(e, '_interrupted', 0)
- localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_INTERRUPTED', str(interrupted))
- bb.build.exec_func("buildhistory_commit", localdata)
+ reset = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_RESET", True)
+ olddir = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_OLD_DIR", True)
+ if isinstance(e, bb.event.BuildStarted):
+ if reset:
+ import shutil
+ # Clean up after potentially interrupted build.
+ if os.path.isdir(olddir):
+ shutil.rmtree(olddir)
+ rootdir = e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_DIR", True)
+ entries = [ x for x in os.listdir(rootdir) if not x.startswith('.') ]
+ bb.utils.mkdirhier(olddir)
+ for entry in entries:
+ os.rename(os.path.join(rootdir, entry),
+ os.path.join(olddir, entry))
+ elif isinstance(e, bb.event.BuildCompleted):
+ if reset:
+ import shutil
+ shutil.rmtree(olddir)
+ if e.data.getVar("BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT", True) == "1":
+ bb.note("Writing buildhistory")
+ localdata = bb.data.createCopy(e.data)
+ localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_FAILURES', str(e._failures))
+ interrupted = getattr(e, '_interrupted', 0)
+ localdata.setVar('BUILDHISTORY_BUILD_INTERRUPTED', str(interrupted))
+ bb.build.exec_func("buildhistory_commit", localdata)
}
addhandler buildhistory_eventhandler
-buildhistory_eventhandler[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted"
+buildhistory_eventhandler[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted bb.event.BuildStarted"
# FIXME this ought to be moved into the fetcher
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-12 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 6:56 [PATCH] buildhistory.bbclass: remove out-dated information on request Patrick Ohly
2016-02-08 8:52 ` Richard Purdie
2016-02-08 12:35 ` Patrick Ohly
2016-02-10 12:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2016-02-12 8:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Ohly
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox