* [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update @ 2016-08-16 18:55 Khem Raj 2016-08-19 10:14 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-16 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: OE Core mailing list, Yocto Discussion Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Devel List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 452 bytes --] Hi All I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs instead of git fetcher as promised :) Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you see. The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d704336112c3709a8bf771c Thank you for your help -Khem [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-16 18:55 [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 10:14 ` Richard Purdie 2016-08-19 13:40 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2016-08-19 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj, OE Core mailing list, Yocto Discussion Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Devel List On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi All > > I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now > that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs > instead of git fetcher as promised :) > Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you > see. > > The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one > > https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 > 4336112c3709a8bf771c > > Thank you for your help I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the autobuilder as part of regular testing. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 10:14 ` Richard Purdie @ 2016-08-19 13:40 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-19 14:04 ` Gary Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie Cc: Yocto Discussion Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Devel List, OE Core mailing list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1154 bytes --] > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >> see. >> >> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >> >> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >> >> Thank you for your help > > I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I > did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle > and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build > so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything > coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. > > In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the > autobuilder as part of regular testing. Fantastic ! > > Cheers, > > Richard > > [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 13:40 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 14:04 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 14:06 ` Gary Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> Hi All >>> >>> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >>> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >>> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >>> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >>> see. >>> >>> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >>> >>> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >>> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >>> >>> Thank you for your help >> >> I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I >> did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle >> and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build >> so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything >> coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. >> >> In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the >> autobuilder as part of regular testing. > > Fantastic ! Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: CC lib/asm-offsets.s lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) Ideas? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 14:04 ` Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 14:06 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 14:59 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core On 2016-08-19 16:04, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> Hi All >>>> >>>> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >>>> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >>>> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >>>> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >>>> see. >>>> >>>> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >>>> >>>> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >>>> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >>>> >>>> Thank you for your help >>> >>> I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I >>> did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle >>> and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build >>> so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything >>> coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. >>> >>> In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the >>> autobuilder as part of regular testing. >> >> Fantastic ! > > Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: > CC lib/asm-offsets.s > lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch > > This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) > > Ideas? > Also, the bitbake "do_compile log" didn't show me this at all, I had to get it by running 'bitbake u-boot-fslc -c devshell' and then 'make' to see the error :-( -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 14:06 ` Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 14:59 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-19 15:05 ` Gary Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2359 bytes --] This is a long standing assembler error. Which I never get to bottom of. Rwboorinf the build machine helps On Aug 19, 2016 7:06 AM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-19 16:04, Gary Thomas wrote: > >> On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie < >>>> richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All >>>>> >>>>> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >>>>> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >>>>> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >>>>> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >>>>> see. >>>>> >>>>> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >>>>> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your help >>>>> >>>> >>>> I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I >>>> did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle >>>> and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build >>>> so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything >>>> coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. >>>> >>>> In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the >>>> autobuilder as part of regular testing. >>>> >>> >>> Fantastic ! >>> >> >> Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: >> CC lib/asm-offsets.s >> lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch >> >> This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) >> >> Ideas? >> >> > Also, the bitbake "do_compile log" didn't show me this at all, > I had to get it by running 'bitbake u-boot-fslc -c devshell' and > then 'make' to see the error :-( > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3592 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 14:59 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 15:05 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 16:01 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2016-08-19 16:59, Khem Raj wrote: > This is a long standing assembler error. Which I never get to bottom of. Rwboorinf the build machine helps ^^^^^^^^^ What does this mean? As I mentioned, it worked fine before you updated to 6.2 > > > On Aug 19, 2016 7:06 AM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: > > On 2016-08-19 16:04, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi All > > I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now > that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs > instead of git fetcher as promised :) > Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you > see. > > The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one > > https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 > <https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70> > 4336112c3709a8bf771c > > Thank you for your help > > > I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I > did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle > and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build > so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything > coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. > > In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the > autobuilder as part of regular testing. > > > Fantastic ! > > > Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: > CC lib/asm-offsets.s > lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch > > This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) > > Ideas? > > > Also, the bitbake "do_compile log" didn't show me this at all, > I had to get it by running 'bitbake u-boot-fslc -c devshell' and > then 'make' to see the error :-( -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 15:05 ` Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-19 16:01 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-20 14:15 ` Gary Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-08-19 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Gary Thomas; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3201 bytes --] > On Aug 19, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote: > > On 2016-08-19 16:59, Khem Raj wrote: >> This is a long standing assembler error. Which I never get to bottom of. Rwboorinf the build machine helps > ^^^^^^^^^ > > What does this mean? As I mentioned, it worked fine before you updated to 6.2 ‘rebooting’, ( blame the phone keyboard) this is a memory block that returns wrong string and somehow related to allocations in assembler, if its the same error as I know of. It does not have to do with gcc. > >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016 7:06 AM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-19 16:04, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org >> <mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> Hi All >> >> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >> see. >> >> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >> >> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >> <https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70> >> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >> >> Thank you for your help >> >> >> I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I >> did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle >> and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build >> so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything >> coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. >> >> In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the >> autobuilder as part of regular testing. >> >> >> Fantastic ! >> >> >> Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: >> CC lib/asm-offsets.s >> lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch >> >> This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) >> >> Ideas? >> >> >> Also, the bitbake "do_compile log" didn't show me this at all, >> I had to get it by running 'bitbake u-boot-fslc -c devshell' and >> then 'make' to see the error :-( > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update 2016-08-19 16:01 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-08-20 14:15 ` Gary Thomas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Gary Thomas @ 2016-08-20 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2016-08-19 18:01, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Aug 19, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-19 16:59, Khem Raj wrote: >>> This is a long standing assembler error. Which I never get to bottom of. Rwboorinf the build machine helps >> ^^^^^^^^^ >> >> What does this mean? As I mentioned, it worked fine before you updated to 6.2 > > ‘rebooting’, ( blame the phone keyboard) this is a memory block that returns wrong string and somehow related to allocations in assembler, if its the same error as I know of. It does not have to do with > gcc. > Fair enough, but a machine reboot wasn't needed. The actual problem came from this recent commit: commit 08a54713acf424f45d8588c5c149a6053c9ac9c5 Author: Manjukumar Matha <manjukumar.harthikote-matha@xilinx.com> Date: Tue Aug 9 10:15:07 2016 -0700 u-boot.inc: Enable out-of-tree builds This change broke some FSL specific code (in meta-fsl-arm) that expected to run in the GIT tree and not a separate 'build' directory - patch already sent. Sorry for the noise (and blaming the GCC update which otherwise has been very unpainful) >> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2016 7:06 AM, "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com <mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-08-19 16:04, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-08-19 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org >>> <mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 11:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> Hi All >>> >>> I have put together recipe upgrade for upcoming gcc 6.2 release now >>> that it entered RC phase. With gcc 6.2 the recipes are using tarballs >>> instead of git fetcher as promised :) >>> Please help testing it out in your setups and report any issues you >>> see. >>> >>> The commit you need to cherry-pick for OE-core is this one >>> >>> https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70 >>> <https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/commit/0319b603761a16e65d70> >>> 4336112c3709a8bf771c >>> >>> Thank you for your help >>> >>> >>> I put this through the autobuilder and it passed so I've merged it. I >>> did this quickly as we're putting a "pre M3" build through a QA cycle >>> and I wanted to get some of the more invasive changes into that build >>> so we don't have a stampeding herd of patches breaking everything >>> coming up to the final feature freeze for 2.2. >>> >>> In other news, we are now also testing musl world builds on the >>> autobuilder as part of regular testing. >>> >>> >>> Fantastic ! >>> >>> >>> Problem using this to build meta-fsl-arm:u-boot-fslc for i.MX6: >>> CC lib/asm-offsets.s >>> lib/asm-offsets.c:1:0: error: bad value (armv5) for -march= switch >>> >>> This worked fine with GCC/6.1 (git) >>> >>> Ideas? >>> >>> >>> Also, the bitbake "do_compile log" didn't show me this at all, >>> I had to get it by running 'bitbake u-boot-fslc -c devshell' and >>> then 'make' to see the error :-( >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Gary Thomas | Consulting for the >> MLB Associates | Embedded world >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-20 14:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-08-16 18:55 [RFT] gcc 6.2 RC1 update Khem Raj 2016-08-19 10:14 ` Richard Purdie 2016-08-19 13:40 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-19 14:04 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 14:06 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 14:59 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-19 15:05 ` Gary Thomas 2016-08-19 16:01 ` Khem Raj 2016-08-20 14:15 ` Gary Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox