Package re-order fallouts?

Package re-order fallouts?

[Samuel Stirtzel]

Hi,

after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
package order has been changed.
This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for
various meta-kde recipes.

What is the preferred way to fix this?
Currently done something like: unset FILES_SOLIBSDEV and add all
dev-libs by hand (there must be a better way to fix this).


-- 
Regards
Samuel

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
> package order has been changed.

You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
>> package order has been changed.
>
> You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master?
master

Meant the next branch of the setup-scripts:
https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts/blob/next/sources/layers.txt


-- 
Regards
Samuel

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel
<s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
>> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
>>> package order has been changed.
>>
>> You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master?
> master
>
> Meant the next branch of the setup-scripts:
> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts/blob/next/sources/layers.txt
>
>

thats angstrom-next I believe then the question is more relevant to
angstrom-distro ml

> --
> Regards
> Samuel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2012/8/28 Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel
> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
>>> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>>>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
>>>> package order has been changed.
>>>
>>> You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master?
>> master
>>
>> Meant the next branch of the setup-scripts:
>> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts/blob/next/sources/layers.txt
>>
>>
>
> thats angstrom-next I believe then the question is more relevant to
> angstrom-distro ml
>

The package re-ordering happened in OE-Core and _not in Angstrom_ how
is this Angstrom related?



-- 
Regards
Samuel

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2012/8/29 Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com>:
> 2012/8/28 Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Samuel Stirtzel
>> <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 2012/8/28 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
>>>> On Tuesday 28 August 2012 09:37:53 Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
>>>>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
>>>>> package order has been changed.
>>>>
>>>> You say "next", do you mean denzil-next or master?
>>> master
>>>
>>> Meant the next branch of the setup-scripts:
>>> https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/setup-scripts/blob/next/sources/layers.txt
>>>
>>>
>>
>> thats angstrom-next I believe then the question is more relevant to
>> angstrom-distro ml
>>
>
> The package re-ordering happened in OE-Core and _not in Angstrom_ how
> is this Angstrom related?

To be more specific
this commit:
commit 66c36bcb7d9368718453265e58bd5e3c854c786a
Author: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 5 04:52:21 2012 -0700

    bitbake.conf: reorder PACKAGES list

    This change re-orders the PACKAGES list to move PN to the end of the list
    this will ensure that base package gets the final bits since the packaging
    is greedy. We can then have -dev and other package get bits first.

    Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>



-- 
Regards
Samuel

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Khem Raj]

On Aug 28, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:

> 
> The package re-ordering happened in OE-Core and _not in Angstrom_ how
> is this Angstrom related?
> 

I misunderstood I think you are referring to 

commit b41b2bc584756956a48c9c5f91e7337e821105b2
Author: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 28 13:33:42 2012 -0700

    bitbake.conf: Add PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN to PACKAGES


and 

commit 66c36bcb7d9368718453265e58bd5e3c854c786a
Author: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 5 04:52:21 2012 -0700

    bitbake.conf: reorder PACKAGES list
    
    This change re-orders the PACKAGES list to move PN to the end of the list
    this will ensure that base package gets the final bits since the packaging
    is greedy. We can then have -dev and other package get bits first.
    


yes layers need to adjust to cope with it.

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Khem Raj]

On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:

> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
> package order has been changed.
> This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for
> various meta-kde recipes.
> 
> What is the preferred way to fix this?
> Currently done something like: unset FILES_SOLIBSDEV and add all
> dev-libs by hand (there must be a better way to fix this).
> 


yes if you have files ending with .so and are not symlinks then its better that you specify
them by hand to go into packages you want them to be in presumably -dev and empty out FILES_SOLIBSDEV

Re: Package re-order fallouts?

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2012/8/29 Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>:
>
> On Aug 28, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Samuel Stirtzel <s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> after switching from the Denzil branch to next it seems that the
>> package order has been changed.
>> This causes failures with non symlink .so files in -dev packages for
>> various meta-kde recipes.
>>
>> What is the preferred way to fix this?
>> Currently done something like: unset FILES_SOLIBSDEV and add all
>> dev-libs by hand (there must be a better way to fix this).
>>
>
>
> yes if you have files ending with .so and are not symlinks then its better that you specify
> them by hand to go into packages you want them to be in presumably -dev and empty out FILES_SOLIBSDEV

OK thanks,
if this is the preferred way then it is alright.


-- 
Regards
Samuel