* potential bashism in guile_2.0.13.bb
@ 2017-01-31 12:29 Patrick Ohly
2017-02-01 17:03 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2017-01-31 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OpenEmbedded
Hello!
verify-bashisms (after some fixing of the script) reports:
/work/iot-ref-kit/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/guile/guile_2.0.13.bb
possible bashism in guile_cross_config line 94 ($'...' should be "$(printf '...')"):
echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> ${B}/guile-config.cross
This is for:
guile_cross_config() {
# this is only for target recipe
if [ "${PN}" = "guile" ]
then
# Create guile-config returning target values instead of native values
install -d ${SYSROOT_DESTDIR}${STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS}
echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> ${B}/guile-config.cross
And the resulting guile-config.cross has (when /bin/sh -> /bin/dash):
#!/fast/build/refkit/intel-corei7-64/tmp-glibc/work/corei7-64-refkit-linux/guile/2.0.13-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-guile$ \
--no-auto-compile -e main -s
!#
(define %guile-build-info '(
...
This looks rather strange to me and I've no idea how the Linux kernel
will interpret that first shebang line, which literally ends in
...guile$ \
Is the content as intended?
It builds, whatever that means.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: potential bashism in guile_2.0.13.bb
2017-01-31 12:29 potential bashism in guile_2.0.13.bb Patrick Ohly
@ 2017-02-01 17:03 ` Khem Raj
2017-02-02 11:09 ` Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2017-02-01 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 1/31/17 4:29 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> verify-bashisms (after some fixing of the script) reports:
>
> /work/iot-ref-kit/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/guile/guile_2.0.13.bb
> possible bashism in guile_cross_config line 94 ($'...' should be "$(printf '...')"):
> echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> > ${B}/guile-config.cross
>
>
> This is for:
>
> guile_cross_config() {
> # this is only for target recipe
> if [ "${PN}" = "guile" ]
> then
> # Create guile-config returning target values instead of native values
> install -d ${SYSROOT_DESTDIR}${STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS}
> echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> > ${B}/guile-config.cross
>
> And the resulting guile-config.cross has (when /bin/sh -> /bin/dash):
>
> #!/fast/build/refkit/intel-corei7-64/tmp-glibc/work/corei7-64-refkit-linux/guile/2.0.13-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-guile$ \
> --no-auto-compile -e main -s
> !#
> (define %guile-build-info '(
> ...
>
> This looks rather strange to me and I've no idea how the Linux kernel
> will interpret that first shebang line, which literally ends in
> ...guile$ \
>
> Is the content as intended?
it should have come out as path to native guile with options, I think if
this is not happening it might just be installing wrong wrapper when
used it should complain. In any case its better to make it shell
independent.
>
> It builds, whatever that means.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: potential bashism in guile_2.0.13.bb
2017-02-01 17:03 ` Khem Raj
@ 2017-02-02 11:09 ` Patrick Ohly
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Ohly @ 2017-02-02 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:03 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On 1/31/17 4:29 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > verify-bashisms (after some fixing of the script) reports:
> >
> > /work/iot-ref-kit/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/guile/guile_2.0.13.bb
> > possible bashism in guile_cross_config line 94 ($'...' should be "$(printf '...')"):
> > echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> > > ${B}/guile-config.cross
> >
> >
> > This is for:
> >
> > guile_cross_config() {
> > # this is only for target recipe
> > if [ "${PN}" = "guile" ]
> > then
> > # Create guile-config returning target values instead of native values
> > install -d ${SYSROOT_DESTDIR}${STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS}
> > echo '#!'`which ${BUILD_SYS}-guile`$' \\\n--no-auto-compile -e main -s\n!#\n(define %guile-build-info '\'\( \
> > > ${B}/guile-config.cross
> >
> > And the resulting guile-config.cross has (when /bin/sh -> /bin/dash):
> >
> > #!/fast/build/refkit/intel-corei7-64/tmp-glibc/work/corei7-64-refkit-linux/guile/2.0.13-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-guile$ \
> > --no-auto-compile -e main -s
> > !#
> > (define %guile-build-info '(
> > ...
> >
> > This looks rather strange to me and I've no idea how the Linux kernel
> > will interpret that first shebang line, which literally ends in
> > ...guile$ \
> >
> > Is the content as intended?
>
> it should have come out as path to native guile with options, I think if
> this is not happening it might just be installing wrong wrapper when
> used it should complain.
Here's a test script:
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
#!/bin/echo \
hello world
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That prints:
\ /tmp/test2
It doesn't look like line continuation in the shebang line works, so the
above guile-config.cross is just wrong. However, both dash and bash do
the same thing, so I guess the file is not used at all?
> In any case its better to make it shell
> independent.
So the correct content of guile-config.cross would be this?
#!/.../guile/2.0.13-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-guile --no-auto-compile -e main -s
!#
(define %guile-build-info '(
...
I have no idea what the script is supposed to do, so I'm a bit reluctant
to change anything.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-02 11:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-31 12:29 potential bashism in guile_2.0.13.bb Patrick Ohly
2017-02-01 17:03 ` Khem Raj
2017-02-02 11:09 ` Patrick Ohly
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox