From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qmake2.bbclass: export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:54:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14899581.O0scG6jzAS@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF6ED5.4010500@linux.intel.com>
On Wednesday 05 June 2013 10:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 09:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 June 2013 09:46:49 Saul Wold wrote:
> >> On 06/05/2013 02:30 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:01:50PM +1000, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> >>>> qconfig.pri was not being loaded by qmake properly. This means Qt
> >>>> qmake projects are unable to query QT_ARCH, QT_VERSION and other
> >>>> variables defined in qconfig.pri.
> >>>>
> >>>> Export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG, setting it to the location of qconfig.pri
> >>>> so that it can be located by qmake.
> >>>
> >>> There is such patch already:
> >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-May/07831
> >>> 4.
> >>> html
> >>
> >> Got lost in my queue, adding it for the next MUT.
> >
> > FWIW I am still concerned by the assertion in the commit message about it
> > causing undesirable behaviour. I'd want that checked out and the note
> > removed before we look at merging this.
>
> OK, I will shelf this until I hear more about the testing of this change
> regarding the original patch's note.
So I tested a rebuild of qt4-x11-free with Felipe's patch and two of
Jonathan's ("qt4: fix QMAKE_QT_CONFIG being overwritten with empty value" and
"classes/qmake_base: allow parallel make"), and did not observe any unexpected
behaviour and buildhistory looks clean for qt itself and fotowall/quicky. So
I'd say feel free to throw these into MUT, but I think we need to drop the
note.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 9:01 [PATCH] qmake2.bbclass: export OE_QMAKE_QT_CONFIG Jonathan Liu
2013-06-05 9:30 ` Martin Jansa
2013-06-05 16:46 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-05 16:57 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-06-05 17:01 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-06 9:54 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-06-06 19:18 ` Felipe Tonello
2013-06-06 20:06 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-06 23:17 ` Jonathan Liu
2013-06-06 23:31 ` Martin Jansa
2013-06-10 5:09 ` Jonathan Liu
2013-06-05 17:04 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-06-06 3:11 ` Jonathan Liu
2013-06-06 12:23 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-06-11 23:46 ` Jonathan Liu
2013-06-13 15:20 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-13 23:35 ` Jonathan Liu
2013-06-13 23:51 ` Saul Wold
2013-06-14 18:15 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14899581.O0scG6jzAS@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox