From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:35:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490286911.28281.84.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6135390.NMCEsh2eSl@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 15:57 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:53:31 AM NZDT Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
> > Revision: 1
> > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/5923/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> >
> > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
> > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
> > series by patchtest resulting in the following results:
> >
> >
> >
> > * Issue [pretest_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> >
> > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_src_uri_left_files]
> >
> > * Issue No added or modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [pretest_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> >
> > * Issue [pretest_pylint]
> >
> > * Issue [test_max_line_length]
> >
> > * Issue [test_cve_presence_in_commit_message]
> >
> > * Issue [test_cve_tag_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_shortlog_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_shortlog_length]
> >
> > * Issue [test_summary_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_upstream_status_format]
> >
> > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Upstream-Status presence [test_upstream_status_presence]
> >
> > * Issue Until general agreement with the community, disabling it
> > [test_commit_message_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_mbox_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_series_merge_on_head]
> >
> > * Issue [test_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
> >
> > * Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > [test_src_uri_left_files]
> >
> > * Issue [test_bugzilla_entry_format]
> >
> > * Issue [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> >
> > * Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test
> > Signed-off-by presence [test_signed_off_by_presence]
> >
> > * Issue Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists
> > [test_target_mailing_list]
> >
> > * Issue No modified or added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
> >
> > * Issue No added recipes, skipping test
> > [test_lic_files_chksum_presence]
> >
> > * Issue [test_pylint]
> >
> > * Issue [test_author_valid]
>
> These results look a bit broken - some are skipped and really shouldn't be
> showing at all. Was the script invoked in a different way to normal?
>
Yes, it was invoked in a different way so there was not filtering on
failures. From now on, we should be getting emails just with test
failures.
Leo
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 13:42 [PATCH 00/10] #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] wic: remove rootfs_pcbios_ext plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] wic: don't set creator.bootimg_dir in plugins Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] wic: use kernel_dir instead of bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] wic: fix bug in sparse_copy Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] wic: use STAGING_DATADIR as a default for bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] wic: remove empty plugin methods Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] wic: improve getting syslinux path Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] oe-selftest: test wic rawcopy plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] selftest: pylinted wic test suite Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] oe-selftest: add test_rawcopy_plugin test case Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 20:53 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Patchwork
2017-03-23 2:57 ` Paul Eggleton
2017-03-23 16:35 ` Leonardo Sandoval [this message]
2017-03-23 16:36 ` Leonardo Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490286911.28281.84.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox