From: Patchwork <patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org>
To: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:53:31 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322205331.6648.75789@do.openembedded.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490188583.git.ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
== Series Details ==
Series: #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part)
Revision: 1
URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/5923/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following results:
* Issue [pretest_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
* Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest [pretest_src_uri_left_files]
* Issue No added or modified recipes, skipping pretest [pretest_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
* Issue [pretest_pylint]
* Issue [test_max_line_length]
* Issue [test_cve_presence_in_commit_message]
* Issue [test_cve_tag_format]
* Issue [test_shortlog_format]
* Issue [test_shortlog_length]
* Issue [test_summary_presence]
* Issue [test_upstream_status_format]
* Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test Upstream-Status presence [test_upstream_status_presence]
* Issue Until general agreement with the community, disabling it [test_commit_message_presence]
* Issue [test_mbox_format]
* Issue [test_series_merge_on_head]
* Issue [test_src_uri_checksums_not_changed]
* Issue No modified recipes, skipping pretest [test_src_uri_left_files]
* Issue [test_bugzilla_entry_format]
* Issue [test_signed_off_by_presence]
* Issue There are no new software patches, no reason to test Signed-off-by presence [test_signed_off_by_presence]
* Issue Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists [test_target_mailing_list]
* Issue No modified or added recipes, skipping test [test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned]
* Issue No added recipes, skipping test [test_lic_files_chksum_presence]
* Issue [test_pylint]
* Issue [test_author_valid]
If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
[PATCH v3] -> ...).
---
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 13:42 [PATCH 00/10] #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 01/10] wic: remove rootfs_pcbios_ext plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 02/10] wic: don't set creator.bootimg_dir in plugins Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 03/10] wic: use kernel_dir instead of bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 04/10] wic: fix bug in sparse_copy Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 05/10] wic: use STAGING_DATADIR as a default for bootimg_dir Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 06/10] wic: remove empty plugin methods Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 07/10] wic: improve getting syslinux path Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 08/10] oe-selftest: test wic rawcopy plugin Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 09/10] selftest: pylinted wic test suite Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 13:42 ` [PATCH 10/10] oe-selftest: add test_rawcopy_plugin test case Ed Bartosh
2017-03-22 20:53 ` Patchwork [this message]
2017-03-23 2:57 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for #10618: Increase oe-selftest coverage of wic codebase (first part) Paul Eggleton
2017-03-23 16:35 ` Leonardo Sandoval
2017-03-23 16:36 ` Leonardo Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322205331.6648.75789@do.openembedded.org \
--to=patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org \
--cc=ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox