Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: "wenzong fan" <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>,
	"José Bollo" <jobol@nonadev.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:50:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515066650.10775.24.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d85e2e6d-e7b1-8ebd-e3ce-01a26bdabbcc@windriver.com>

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 19:39 +0800, wenzong fan wrote:
> If so, I think we should wrapper the logic with:
> 
> +#if defined(WITH_ATTR) && !defined(WITH_SELINUX)
> +      attr_copy_file (def_template, user_home, NULL, NULL);
> +#endif

Does attr_copy_file fail when SELinux is active? In other words, why
should it be disabled when using SELinux?

File capabilities are also stored in xattrs. It might be relevant to
copy those when using SELinux. Or do I miss something?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.




  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 14:07 [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes jobol
2017-03-09 16:07 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-09 16:48   ` José Bollo
2017-03-09 17:18     ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15  8:04       ` José Bollo
2018-01-04  9:28         ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04  9:31           ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04 10:18           ` José Bollo
2018-01-04 10:41             ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-04 11:39               ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04 11:50                 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2018-01-05  1:07                   ` Fan, Wenzong
2018-01-09 17:01                     ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-10  9:50                       ` wenzong fan
2018-01-15 14:33                         ` José Bollo
2018-01-15 16:58                           ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-16  2:53                           ` wenzong fan
2018-01-09 17:51               ` Mark Hatle
2018-01-10 11:15                 ` Patrick Ohly
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-13  9:57 jobol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515066650.10775.24.camel@intel.com \
    --to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    --cc=jobol@nonadev.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox