Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
To: "Patrick Ohly" <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
	"José Bollo" <jobol@nonadev.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:39:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d85e2e6d-e7b1-8ebd-e3ce-01a26bdabbcc@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515062493.10775.21.camel@intel.com>



On 01/04/2018 06:41 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 11:18 +0100, José Bollo wrote:
>>> Do you agree to move the patch to Smack specific layer? Such as
>>> meta-security?
>>
>> I agree.
> 
> Layers like meta-security should not modify recipes from other layers,
> at least not by default. That would violate the "Yocto Compatible 2.0"
> rules.
> 
> Besides, it would be harder to maintain in a separate layer - for the
> maintainer of that layer.
> 
> I still think this patch belong into OE-core, even though it is then
> more work for the OE-core maintainer.
> 

If so, I think we should wrapper the logic with:

+#if defined(WITH_ATTR) && !defined(WITH_SELINUX)
+      attr_copy_file (def_template, user_home, NULL, NULL);
+#endif

Or just add a new condition like WITH_SMACK or something.

Thanks
Wenzong



  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 14:07 [PATCH] shadow: 'useradd' copies root's extended attributes jobol
2017-03-09 16:07 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-09 16:48   ` José Bollo
2017-03-09 17:18     ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15  8:04       ` José Bollo
2018-01-04  9:28         ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04  9:31           ` wenzong fan
2018-01-04 10:18           ` José Bollo
2018-01-04 10:41             ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-04 11:39               ` wenzong fan [this message]
2018-01-04 11:50                 ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-05  1:07                   ` Fan, Wenzong
2018-01-09 17:01                     ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-10  9:50                       ` wenzong fan
2018-01-15 14:33                         ` José Bollo
2018-01-15 16:58                           ` Patrick Ohly
2018-01-16  2:53                           ` wenzong fan
2018-01-09 17:51               ` Mark Hatle
2018-01-10 11:15                 ` Patrick Ohly
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-13  9:57 jobol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d85e2e6d-e7b1-8ebd-e3ce-01a26bdabbcc@windriver.com \
    --to=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
    --cc=jobol@nonadev.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox