public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philip Lorenz" <philip@bithub.de>
To: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [pseudo][PATCH] test: Add missing test-statx test case
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 14:50:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da17950-2f3b-632f-44ec-35feaef70ce8@bithub.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811171925.GA15765@mcrowe.com>

On 11.08.21 19:19, Mike Crowe wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2021 at 18:41:32 +0200, Philip Lorenz wrote:
>> Adding this test case was erroneously omitted in
>> 7c722296879906fe093e1e7c4b7537e150d492cd.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Lorenz <philip@bithub.de>
>> ---
>>   test/test-statx.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   test/test-statx.sh |  6 ++++++
>>   2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 test/test-statx.c
>>   create mode 100755 test/test-statx.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/test/test-statx.c b/test/test-statx.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..06d86af
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/test/test-statx.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Test that passing NULL to a parameter marked as nonnull works correctly
>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-only
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
>> +
>> +#include <sys/stat.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>> +
>> +// Passing a null pointer is the test scenario
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wnonnull"
>> +
>> +int main(void) {
>> +    if (statx(0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL) != -1) {
>> +        return 1;
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/test/test-statx.sh b/test/test-statx.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..77d0302
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/test/test-statx.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +#
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-only
>> +#
>> +
>> +exec ./test/test-statx
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0
> Applying this patch (along with <169A4FE272BB166C.28384@lists.openembedded.org>)
> makes all the tests pass for me. However, the run of test-statx.sh causes:
>
>   couldn't allocate absolute path for '(null)'.
>
> to be printed.

The test explicitly tests whether a NULL path does not segfault when 
compiled with newer GCC releases (which was fixed in 
7c722296879906fe093e1e7c4b7537e150d492cd). As such the observed error 
message is "intended". It may however make sense to special case NULL 
parameters in pseudo_root_path.

Philip


      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-15 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11 16:41 [pseudo][PATCH] test: Add missing test-statx test case Philip Lorenz
2021-08-11 17:19 ` [OE-core] " Mike Crowe
2021-08-15 12:50   ` Philip Lorenz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1da17950-2f3b-632f-44ec-35feaef70ce8@bithub.de \
    --to=philip@bithub.de \
    --cc=mac@mcrowe.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox