Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* List of bbappends without matching recipes
@ 2011-06-09 15:15 Koen Kooi
  2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-06-09 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

Hey,

I ran bitbake layers on a stock angstrom setup and it reported a lot of 'broken' bbappends:

meta-intel:
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-standalone-gmae-sdk-target.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite_1.9.3.bbappend
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend

meta-smartphone:
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-smartphone/meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/udev/udev_168.bbappend

meta-nslu2:
  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-nslu2/recipes-core/images/slugos-image.bbappend

regards,

Koen


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:15 List of bbappends without matching recipes Koen Kooi
@ 2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
  2011-06-09 15:32   ` Koen Kooi
  2011-06-09 15:28 ` Phil Blundell
  2011-06-09 15:31 ` Paul Eggleton
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2011-06-09 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I ran bitbake layers on a stock angstrom setup and it reported a lot of 'broken' bbappends:
>
> meta-intel:
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend

Don't these match the -stable (soon to be 2.6.34) kernel recipe ?

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb

or maybe I'm just missing something, you did have 'broken' in
quotes :)

Cheers,

Bruce


>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-standalone-gmae-sdk-target.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-dri-lite_1.9.3.bbappend
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend
>
> meta-smartphone:
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-smartphone/meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/udev/udev_168.bbappend
>
> meta-nslu2:
>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-nslu2/recipes-core/images/slugos-image.bbappend
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:15 List of bbappends without matching recipes Koen Kooi
  2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-06-09 15:28 ` Phil Blundell
  2011-06-09 15:31 ` Paul Eggleton
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2011-06-09 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> meta-intel:
>   /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>   /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>   /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>   /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>   /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend

Most/all of the recipes that you mentioned do exist in oe-core but have
restrictive COMPATIBLE_MACHINE definitions.  I wonder if that's what is
causing your problem.

p.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:15 List of bbappends without matching recipes Koen Kooi
  2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
  2011-06-09 15:28 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2011-06-09 15:31 ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-06-09 15:54   ` Paul Eggleton
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2011-06-09 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:15:49 Koen Kooi wrote:
> I ran bitbake layers on a stock angstrom setup and it reported a lot of
> 'broken' bbappends:

I've recently submitted a patch to bitbake-devel which fixes bitbake-layers' 
handling of skipped recipes so that it doesn't report them as missing. I don't 
think skipped recipes can account for that entire list however.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2011-06-09 15:32   ` Koen Kooi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-06-09 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer


Op 9 jun 2011, om 17:24 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven:

> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> Hey,
>> 
>> I ran bitbake layers on a stock angstrom setup and it reported a lot of 'broken' bbappends:
>> 
>> meta-intel:
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/../common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-sugarbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-crownbay/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-emenlow/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-fishriver/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-jasperforest/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
>>  /OE/tentacle/sources/meta-intel/meta-n450/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bbappend
> 
> Don't these match the -stable (soon to be 2.6.34) kernel recipe ?
> 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb
> 
> or maybe I'm just missing something, you did have 'broken' in
> quotes :)

I but it in quotes because I have a hard time believing that the linux-yocto appends are really broken :) But this is what 'bitbake layers' outputs, so there is *something* wrong, but I don't know where. RP is doing some heavy work on bitbake/master and bitbake/poky-master so I might have triggered a bug(fix) somewhere by updating bitbake. I don't want to discourage RP from bitbake work, just saying that I'm tracking bitbake master closely.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:31 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2011-06-09 15:54   ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-06-09 16:02     ` Martin Jansa
  2011-06-09 16:35     ` Chris Larson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2011-06-09 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Koen Kooi; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:31:48 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I've recently submitted a patch to bitbake-devel which fixes
> bitbake-layers' handling of skipped recipes so that it doesn't report them
> as missing. I don't think skipped recipes can account for that entire list
> however.

OK so those patches don't apply anymore, have rebased them locally (+ added 
one fix) and will resubmit. FYI this is the list I have come up with, without 
skipped recipes:

---------------
meta-intel:
  meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-standalone-gmae-sdk-
target.bbappend
  meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend
  
meta-smartphone:
  meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/udev/udev_168.bbappend

meta-nslu2:
  recipes-core/images/slugos-image.bbappend
---------------

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:54   ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2011-06-09 16:02     ` Martin Jansa
  2011-06-09 16:35     ` Chris Larson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2011-06-09 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Koen Kooi

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:31:48 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > I've recently submitted a patch to bitbake-devel which fixes
> > bitbake-layers' handling of skipped recipes so that it doesn't report them
> > as missing. I don't think skipped recipes can account for that entire list
> > however.
> 
> OK so those patches don't apply anymore, have rebased them locally (+ added 
> one fix) and will resubmit. FYI this is the list I have come up with, without 
> skipped recipes:
> 
> ---------------
> meta-intel:
>   meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-standalone-gmae-sdk-
> target.bbappend
>   meta-emenlow/recipes-gnome/tasks/task-poky-sdk-gmae.bbappend
>   
> meta-smartphone:
>   meta-nokia/recipes-bsp/udev/udev_168.bbappend

was removed after koen's report
http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a=commit;h=f37d05ca7450f85642cea0e43a75df10663bd8f6

I see 2 more
WARNING: No recipes available for:
  /OE/shr-core/meta-smartphone/meta-palm/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bbappend
  /OE/shr-core/meta-smartphone/meta-palm/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_git.bbappend
and I'll talk with morphis to update them

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: List of bbappends without matching recipes
  2011-06-09 15:54   ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-06-09 16:02     ` Martin Jansa
@ 2011-06-09 16:35     ` Chris Larson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Larson @ 2011-06-09 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 16:31:48 Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> I've recently submitted a patch to bitbake-devel which fixes
>> bitbake-layers' handling of skipped recipes so that it doesn't report them
>> as missing. I don't think skipped recipes can account for that entire list
>> however.
>
> OK so those patches don't apply anymore, have rebased them locally (+ added
> one fix) and will resubmit. FYI this is the list I have come up with, without
> skipped recipes:
>

Those patches look reasonable to me, thanks for taking the time to
look into it and fix it.

Acked-by: Chris Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com>
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-09 16:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-09 15:15 List of bbappends without matching recipes Koen Kooi
2011-06-09 15:24 ` Bruce Ashfield
2011-06-09 15:32   ` Koen Kooi
2011-06-09 15:28 ` Phil Blundell
2011-06-09 15:31 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-06-09 15:54   ` Paul Eggleton
2011-06-09 16:02     ` Martin Jansa
2011-06-09 16:35     ` Chris Larson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox