* RFC: classes cleanup
@ 2011-07-13 11:15 Paul Eggleton
2011-07-13 11:22 ` Phil Blundell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2011-07-13 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
Hi all,
I was looking through classes/ the other day and I noticed a few that probably
don't need to be in oe-core. The list I came up with:
* base_srpm.bbclass - unused, refers to missing rpm_core.bbclass
* ccdv.bbclass - unused, not sure what this is for?
* flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
* mozilla.bbclass - should this be in an upper layer?
* openmoko*.bbclass - should be in an upper layer
* patcher.bbclass - obsolete?
* singlemachine.bbclass - obsolete?
* srec.bbclass - appears to be something LinuxMIPS related. Not sure it
belongs in oe-core.
* tmake.bbclass - obsolete? even oe-dev doesn't use this AFAICT...
* xfce.bbclass - should this be in an upper layer?
* xlibs.bbclass - unused, obsolete?
Comments? Any others we ought to look at removing?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: classes cleanup
2011-07-13 11:15 RFC: classes cleanup Paul Eggleton
@ 2011-07-13 11:22 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-14 14:55 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2011-07-13 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:15 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> * flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
Agreed, this should be deleted. It used to be inherited by some of the
gnome recipes (and, in oe.dev, still is by a few) to work around a
compiler bug. But none of the recipes in oe-core do this, and we don't
ship the affected compiler versions either.
There is one recipe in meta-oe which inherits this class so I guess that
should be fixed before it's deleted.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: classes cleanup
2011-07-13 11:22 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2011-07-14 14:55 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-14 15:15 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-07-14 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:22 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 12:15 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > * flow-lossage.bbclass - unused, looks obsolete (refers to gcc 3.4)
>
> Agreed, this should be deleted. It used to be inherited by some of the
> gnome recipes (and, in oe.dev, still is by a few) to work around a
> compiler bug. But none of the recipes in oe-core do this, and we don't
> ship the affected compiler versions either.
>
> There is one recipe in meta-oe which inherits this class so I guess that
> should be fixed before it's deleted.
Can someone do that please as I think we should get rid of that class :)
Looking through the list there is nothing I feel we really need to keep
at this point although some like patcher and singlemachine should still
work...
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-14 15:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-13 11:15 RFC: classes cleanup Paul Eggleton
2011-07-13 11:22 ` Phil Blundell
2011-07-14 14:55 ` Richard Purdie
2011-07-14 15:15 ` Paul Eggleton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox