Re: [bitbake-devel] should we switch off patchwork for oe-core and bitbake projects

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:07:14AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:51 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
> > <B29882@freescale.com> wrote:
> > > I'm saying leave it there even if its not maintained. I can still go search
> > > for patches sent by me or other specific people.
> > 
> > thats what mailing list archives are for.
> 
> is there something like
> oe/contrib/patchwork/pw-am.sh
> for some mailing list archive?
> 
> When I see some interesting patch in ML, easiest way for me to get it to
> development branch is to open patchwork web (from any computer) and then
> call pw-am.sh NUMBER in screen session on my development workstation.
> 
> Even when reading mail in mutt on the same machine it's easier for me to
> use pw-am.sh to get that patch to my chroot for OE builds.
> 
> And that git hook marking them as applied works very well.. so usually I
> just have to mark cover letters as applied.

I'd vote for keeping patchworks as well - there are rare patches submitted to 
oe-core w/o corresponding pull requests...

-- 
Denys