Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Cc: Marco Cavallini <m.cavallini@koansoftware.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:06:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409190616.GE2474@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C59D9F91-BDCD-496F-B6DA-8C6BB5990939@dominion.thruhere.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> 
> Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> >> On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini <koansoftware@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> * Recipe taken from oe-classic
> >>> * Required by xinput-calibrator
> >> 
> >> oe-core already ships not one but two terminal emulators, let's not
> >> add another one.  Can we make this configurable in the recipe somehow
> >> and default to use matchbox-terminal (which is in the Sato images)?
> >> 
> >> Long-term, alternatives along the lines of Debian's
> >> x-terminal-emulator is probably something we want.  Then again I'm
> >> still not entirely sure why this is even spawning a terminal in the
> >> first place.
> > 
> > u-a is not enough, we also need VIRTUAL-RUNTIME-x-terminal-emulator for
> > other recipes to RDEPENDS/RSUGGESTS/RRECOMMENDS on if they need some
> > terminal (and don't care which one will be used).
> 
> Isn't this what xdg-utils are for?

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how xdg-utils will help
bitbake to find suitable runtime provider for "any-x-terminal-emulator".

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-09 14:21 [oe][meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] xterm: add latest version of xterm Marco Cavallini
2013-04-09 14:26 ` Burton, Ross
2013-04-09 17:46   ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-09 18:01     ` Koen Kooi
2013-04-09 19:06       ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2013-04-10  5:44         ` Koen Kooi
2013-04-10 16:56           ` Trevor Woerner
2013-04-10 18:10             ` Marco
2013-04-10 19:36               ` Martin Jansa
2013-04-10 19:43                 ` Mark Hatle
2013-04-11  9:02                   ` Marco
2013-04-10 22:44               ` Trevor Woerner
2013-04-10 22:53                 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-04-11  9:04                   ` Marco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130409190616.GE2474@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=m.cavallini@koansoftware.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox