From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] base.bbclass: Introduce EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG variable
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160325105025.GC2555@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LaVL04OQaipNFn1hyCGruFZ7itmrxH00i=L+OkcsZexQw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:40:31PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 27 February 2016 at 22:09, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > * add separate variable for configuration options generated from
> > PACKAGECONFIG setting, this helps other bbclasses and recipes
> > to take advantage of PACKAGECONFIG mechanism, without including
> > other options from EXTRA_OECONF
> > * e.g. meta-qt5 recipes are abusing EXTRA_OECONF to get options
> > from PACKAGECONFIG:
> > EXTRA_QMAKEVARS_PRE +=
> > but with
> > conf/distro/include/no-static-libs.inc
> > it means getting --disable-static as invalid option inside
> > EXTRA_QMAKEVARS_PRE as reported by Alexandre Belloni who tried
> > to use poky with meta-qt5.
> > * once we migrate all bbclasses and recipes to EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG
> > we should also restrict EXTRA_OECONF append only to autotools.bbclass
> > like I did for cmake.bbclass
> >
>
> Sorry, some of us have been a bit busy trying to get M3 stable. This does
> look good and I'm for squeezing it into M3.
Any update on squeezing this?
meta-qt5 is still broken with default poky config
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-27 22:09 [PATCH][RFC] base.bbclass: Introduce EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG variable Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 12:38 ` Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 13:11 ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-02 13:24 ` Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 12:40 ` Burton, Ross
2016-03-25 10:50 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2016-03-25 11:28 ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-25 11:55 ` Martin Jansa
2016-04-18 22:31 ` Otavio Salvador
2016-04-18 22:45 ` Richard Purdie
2016-04-18 22:49 ` Otavio Salvador
2016-04-19 9:50 ` Martin Jansa
2016-04-19 10:31 ` [PATCH] base.bbclass: Introduce PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS variable Martin Jansa
2016-04-19 13:23 ` Otavio Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160325105025.GC2555@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox