Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] base.bbclass: Introduce EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG variable
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:50:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419095052.GB2562@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKoNFy_=_q4mCDnr7hCbtKccmjAfwK=4Syrn8pd9UyJs4w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:49:51PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >> > Was there some agreement about variable name?
> >>
> >> meta-qt5 5.6 is using this so we need a final decision if it will be
> >> merged or not. I am in favor it as I think it is clear enough.
> >
> > It was an RFC and I still don't get a good feeling about the names
> > used.
> >
> > I suggested:
> >
> > PACKAGECONFIG_CONFPARAMS
> > or
> > PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS
> 
> I like CONFARGS.

I'll send patch with PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS and wait until it's merged
somewhere, before updating usages of this in other layers (so that I
don't need to redo it again if the name is changed again).

> > as it then makes things slightly clearer these things are coming from
> > PACKAGECONFIG. We have a namespace which is a bit of a mess and I'd
> > prefer to try and improve with new things if we can...
> >
> > The fact meta-qt5 is already using this is bad, it really shouldn't be.
> > We're also very close to the final build of 2.1 right now so this would
> > be a very late change :/.

meta-qt5/master isn't using it, it's only in master-next, because
without this change the builds are broken when people use
openembedded-core/meta/conf/distro/include/no-static-libs.inc
e.g. with default Poky config.

> I think it is a safe change but I am fine in postponing it for 2.2. In
> this case we need to revert the usage of it in meta-qt5 (which I also
> support).

Nothing needs to be reverted, because it wasn't merged in any permanent
layer.

If it doesn't go to 2.1 then I'll leave meta-qt5/krogoth version broken
for Poky builds with no-static-libs.inc.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-27 22:09 [PATCH][RFC] base.bbclass: Introduce EXTRA_CONF_PACKAGECONFIG variable Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 12:38 ` Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 13:11   ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-02 13:24     ` Martin Jansa
2016-03-02 12:40 ` Burton, Ross
2016-03-25 10:50   ` Martin Jansa
2016-03-25 11:28     ` Richard Purdie
2016-03-25 11:55       ` Martin Jansa
2016-04-18 22:31         ` Otavio Salvador
2016-04-18 22:45           ` Richard Purdie
2016-04-18 22:49             ` Otavio Salvador
2016-04-19  9:50               ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2016-04-19 10:31                 ` [PATCH] base.bbclass: Introduce PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS variable Martin Jansa
2016-04-19 13:23                   ` Otavio Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160419095052.GB2562@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox