Re: clarifying details about "is not set" lines in kernel config fragment files

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:27:38PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >
> >         oddly, in the current YP kernel dev manual, i don't see the
> >       phrase "is not set" explained anywhere in the entire doc,
> >       which is weird since it seems like it would be important.
> >
> > The manuals don't cover the mechanics of how the mainline kernel is
> > configured. Just the same way the don't cover the configuration
> > language for any number of packages in the system.
> 
>   assuming i'm understanding your position, that's where i'm going to
> *strongly* disagree. people who work with the mainline kernel in a
> non-OE environment don't use kernel config fragment files. period.
> AFAIK (and correct me if i'm wrong), .cfg kernel config fragment files
> are exclusively an OE/YP thing, so there is no reason for normal
> kernel developers to understand how they work.

Or maybe to be more clear, does the manual spell out that these .cfg
files are Kconfig fragments and follow the normal syntax rules Kconfig
uses?  If not, it really should.  If so, maybe it should also contain a
reference to the external authority on this syntax?

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]