Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: OE Core mailing list <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: clarifying details about "is not set" lines in kernel config fragment files
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:05:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1605031601040.2840@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160503184521.GA7884@bill-the-cat>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2211 bytes --]

On Tue, 3 May 2016, Tom Rini wrote:

> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:27:38PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > >         oddly, in the current YP kernel dev manual, i don't see the
> > >       phrase "is not set" explained anywhere in the entire doc,
> > >       which is weird since it seems like it would be important.
> > >
> > > The manuals don't cover the mechanics of how the mainline kernel
> > > is configured. Just the same way the don't cover the
> > > configuration language for any number of packages in the system.
> >
> >   assuming i'm understanding your position, that's where i'm going
> > to *strongly* disagree. people who work with the mainline kernel
> > in a non-OE environment don't use kernel config fragment files.
> > period. AFAIK (and correct me if i'm wrong), .cfg kernel config
> > fragment files are exclusively an OE/YP thing, so there is no
> > reason for normal kernel developers to understand how they work.
>
> Or maybe to be more clear, does the manual spell out that these .cfg
> files are Kconfig fragments and follow the normal syntax rules
> Kconfig uses?  If not, it really should.  If so, maybe it should
> also contain a reference to the external authority on this syntax?

  saying they're regular Kconfig fragments might be technically
correct, but still doesn't explain the *possibilities* as to what can
go into them, and the consequences (or necessity) of adding your own
"is not set" lines, and why you'd want to do that.

  i don't see a long-winded explanation -- no more than a few
paragraphs would suffice to make it clear what developers can do.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-03 17:04 clarifying details about "is not set" lines in kernel config fragment files Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-03 18:10 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-05-03 18:27   ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-03 18:45     ` Tom Rini
2016-05-03 20:05       ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2016-05-04 10:18       ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-03 18:48     ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-05-04 10:41       ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-05-04 12:13         ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-05-03 18:48     ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-05-03 20:06       ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1605031601040.2840@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox