Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
To: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Recipe versions and layer confusion
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:44:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171005164447.48dc7a86bd86519f67a3a41a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171005101918.282f15658ac2a600e3c4c251@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:19:18 -0500
Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:49:28 +0200
> Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl> wrote:
> 
> > I'm confused.
> > 
> > Layer "meta-xilinx" defines:
> > 
> > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb
> > 
> > This recipe is too old for my liking, so I made a newer one in "meta-topic"
> > 
> > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.3.bb
> > 
> > 
> > Much to my surprise, when I build, OE picks the 2017.1 version and not the 
> > 2017.3 version.
> > 
> > bitbake-layers show-layers reveils:
> > ..
> > meta-xilinx           /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-xilinx  5
> > meta-topic            /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-topic  6
> > ..
> > 
> > so that means that my meta-topic should win even if my PV were lower, right?
> 
> "For example, a layer that has a recipe with a higher PV value but for which the BBFILE_PRIORITY is set to have a lower precedence still has a lower precedence."

My bad. topic has higher priority than xilinx, so there is something wrong as you mentioned.

Leo


> 
> taken from
> 
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.3.2/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-BBFILE_PRIORITY
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > Mike Looijmans
> > System Expert
> > 
> > TOPIC Products
> > Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
> > Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> > Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> > E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> > Website: www.topicproducts.com
> > 
> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> > 
> > 
> > Visit us at the Space Tech Expo Europe (Stand E-71)
> > -- 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 
> 
> -- 
> Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


-- 
Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-05 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-05 14:49 Recipe versions and layer confusion Mike Looijmans
2017-10-05 14:59 ` Mark Hatle
2017-10-05 15:11   ` Mike Looijmans
2017-10-05 15:19 ` Leonardo Sandoval
2017-10-05 21:44   ` Leonardo Sandoval [this message]
2017-10-05 22:10     ` Andre McCurdy
2017-10-07  9:15       ` Mike Looijmans
2017-10-05 21:18 ` Paul Eggleton
2017-10-07  2:33 ` Khem Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171005164447.48dc7a86bd86519f67a3a41a@linux.intel.com \
    --to=leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox