Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: sstate hash equivalence breaks rm_work
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:14:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304161443.GQ5026@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c35172f8efc2e7d16a7915037f4b0d412d1707c0.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1430 bytes --]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:06:47PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 10:58 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Ah, so "poky" got me thinking this morning.  I was just on bitbake
> > v1.40
> > (since I usually use thud, and that's the version for that).  Moving
> > to
> > bitbake master/tip and I don't see the problem anymore.
> > 
> > Is it possible to have some logic within OE to check the version of
> > bitbake and throw an error / warning?
> 
> You mean like the BB_MIN_VERSION variable:
> 
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/conf/sanity.conf#n6
> 
> ?
> 
> :)
>
> The changes were intended to be backwards compatible hence it wasn't
> bumped. Clearly something isn't playing as intended...

Yes, that.  I think we haven't fully used that well historically since I
can only ever recall *kaboom* when using too old of a bitbake rather
than a nice sane error message.  Looking at
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases and then some quick git
history, we also must have had that mechanism available when I last ran
into something like that even for the fairly ancient jumping around I've
had to do a time or three.

In fact, can we make BB_MIN_VERSION match the table found there?  It
doesn't look like we have resources / time to test things on both
current and min versions, so we should I think have the min match what
we say should be used.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-03 20:47 sstate hash equivalence breaks rm_work Tom Rini
2019-03-03 21:21 ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 21:25   ` Tom Rini
2019-03-03 22:11     ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 22:20       ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 22:51         ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 10:17           ` Burton, Ross
2019-03-04 10:26             ` Martin Jansa
2019-03-04 10:45               ` Burton, Ross
2019-03-04 10:56                 ` Martin Jansa
2019-03-04 12:21             ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 15:58       ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 16:06         ` Richard Purdie
2019-03-04 16:14           ` Tom Rini [this message]
2019-03-04 16:21             ` Richard Purdie
2019-03-04 16:38               ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 16:17           ` Joshua Watt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190304161443.GQ5026@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox