From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: sstate hash equivalence breaks rm_work
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:14:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304161443.GQ5026@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c35172f8efc2e7d16a7915037f4b0d412d1707c0.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1430 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:06:47PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 10:58 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Ah, so "poky" got me thinking this morning. I was just on bitbake
> > v1.40
> > (since I usually use thud, and that's the version for that). Moving
> > to
> > bitbake master/tip and I don't see the problem anymore.
> >
> > Is it possible to have some logic within OE to check the version of
> > bitbake and throw an error / warning?
>
> You mean like the BB_MIN_VERSION variable:
>
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/conf/sanity.conf#n6
>
> ?
>
> :)
>
> The changes were intended to be backwards compatible hence it wasn't
> bumped. Clearly something isn't playing as intended...
Yes, that. I think we haven't fully used that well historically since I
can only ever recall *kaboom* when using too old of a bitbake rather
than a nice sane error message. Looking at
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases and then some quick git
history, we also must have had that mechanism available when I last ran
into something like that even for the fairly ancient jumping around I've
had to do a time or three.
In fact, can we make BB_MIN_VERSION match the table found there? It
doesn't look like we have resources / time to test things on both
current and min versions, so we should I think have the min match what
we say should be used.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-04 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-03 20:47 sstate hash equivalence breaks rm_work Tom Rini
2019-03-03 21:21 ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 21:25 ` Tom Rini
2019-03-03 22:11 ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 22:20 ` Joshua Watt
2019-03-03 22:51 ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 10:17 ` Burton, Ross
2019-03-04 10:26 ` Martin Jansa
2019-03-04 10:45 ` Burton, Ross
2019-03-04 10:56 ` Martin Jansa
2019-03-04 12:21 ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 15:58 ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 16:06 ` Richard Purdie
2019-03-04 16:14 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2019-03-04 16:21 ` Richard Purdie
2019-03-04 16:38 ` Tom Rini
2019-03-04 16:17 ` Joshua Watt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190304161443.GQ5026@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox