* [PATCH] bitbake: runqueue: Ensure data is handled correctly @ 2019-08-15 16:02 Oleksandr Kravchuk 2019-08-15 16:32 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for " Patchwork 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Oleksandr Kravchuk @ 2019-08-15 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> This doesn't appear to have ill effects right now but there is a correctness issue which this so fix it. (Bitbake rev: a5e084a266f63c2fd370122327615e49beaeb94e) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> --- bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py index 53031740bd..4e64ddfdad 100644 --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py @@ -2306,6 +2306,8 @@ class RunQueueExecute: self.scenequeue_notcovered.remove(tid) if tid in self.scenequeue_covered: self.scenequeue_covered.remove(tid) + if tid in self.scenequeue_notneeded: + self.scenequeue_notneeded.remove(tid) (mc, fn, taskname, taskfn) = split_tid_mcfn(tid) self.sqdata.stamps[tid] = bb.build.stampfile(taskname + "_setscene", self.rqdata.dataCaches[mc], taskfn, noextra=True) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* ✗ patchtest: failure for bitbake: runqueue: Ensure data is handled correctly 2019-08-15 16:02 [PATCH] bitbake: runqueue: Ensure data is handled correctly Oleksandr Kravchuk @ 2019-08-15 16:32 ` Patchwork 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-08-15 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleksandr Kravchuk; +Cc: openembedded-core == Series Details == Series: bitbake: runqueue: Ensure data is handled correctly Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/19294/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: * Issue Series sent to the wrong mailing list or some patches from the series correspond to different mailing lists [test_target_mailing_list] Suggested fix Send the series again to the correct mailing list (ML) Suggested ML bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org [http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/] Patch's path: bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch [test_series_merge_on_head] Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch Targeted branch master (currently at 6b36db8365) If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> [PATCH v3] -> ...). --- Guidelines: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-15 16:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-08-15 16:02 [PATCH] bitbake: runqueue: Ensure data is handled correctly Oleksandr Kravchuk 2019-08-15 16:32 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox