From: "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gcc: Drop reverting __getauxval patch
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514173010.3407-2-raj.khem@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514173010.3407-1-raj.khem@gmail.com>
Issue has been fixed in valgrind itself
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc | 3 +-
...se-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch | 47 -------------------
...mic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} | 2 +-
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
rename meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/{0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch => 0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch} (96%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
index 82b5a20a42..041d426187 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1.inc
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
file://0035-gentypes-genmodes-Do-not-use-__LINE__-for-maintainin.patch \
file://0036-Enable-CET-in-cross-compiler-if-possible.patch \
file://0037-mingw32-Enable-operation_not_supported.patch \
- file://0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch \
- file://0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \
+ file://0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch \
"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "b6898a23844b656f1b68691c5c012036c2e694ac4b53a8918d4712ad876e7ea2"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index fc9228277a..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-Revert-AArch64-Use-__getauxval-instead-of-getauxval-.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
-From 2101fb718935c7cf1cc2ad201bdeb1e635b54b0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:03:41 -0700
-Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[AArch64] Use __getauxval instead of getauxval in LSE
- detection code in libgcc"
-
-This reverts commit 5a57016dd2758cc63a544f191f77635342397a72.
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
----
- libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c | 17 ++++++++---------
- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-index 00e9ab8cd1c..74acef25cce 100644
---- a/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-+++ b/libgcc/config/aarch64/lse-init.c
-@@ -29,20 +29,19 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If not, see
- _Bool __aarch64_have_lse_atomics
- __attribute__((visibility("hidden"), nocommon));
-
--/* Gate availability of __getauxval on glibc. All AArch64-supporting glibc
-- versions support it. */
--#ifdef __gnu_linux__
-+/* Disable initialization of __aarch64_have_lse_atomics during bootstrap. */
-+#if !defined(inhibit_libc) && defined(HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H)
-+# include <sys/auxv.h>
-
--# define AT_HWCAP 16
--# define HWCAP_ATOMICS (1 << 8)
--
--unsigned long int __getauxval (unsigned long int);
-+/* Disable initialization if the system headers are too old. */
-+# if defined(AT_HWCAP) && defined(HWCAP_ATOMICS)
-
- static void __attribute__((constructor))
- init_have_lse_atomics (void)
- {
-- unsigned long hwcap = __getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
-+ unsigned long hwcap = getauxval (AT_HWCAP);
- __aarch64_have_lse_atomics = (hwcap & HWCAP_ATOMICS) != 0;
- }
-
--#endif /* __gnu_linux__ */
-+# endif /* HWCAP */
-+#endif /* inhibit_libc */
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
similarity index 96%
rename from meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
rename to meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
index fecb562f51..3946acea11 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0039-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.1/0038-libatomic-Do-not-enforce-march-on-aarch64.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From 411fc85c14bb14b07c0db807c55d25ce3f3e507f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 38d262bfe7c0c894c364dc6e4dc7971e78a73974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:10:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] libatomic: Do not enforce march on aarch64
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 17:30 [PATCH 1/2] valgrind: Do not use outline-atomics on aarch64 Khem Raj
2020-05-14 17:30 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2020-05-14 18:02 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for "valgrind: Do not use outline-a..." and 1 more Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200514173010.3407-2-raj.khem@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox