[OE-core][PATCH] Bump layer version

[OE-core][PATCH] Bump layer version

[Joshua Watt]

The commits 910ffaf5be ("pyelftools: Import from meta-python") and
a96f815c53 ("pycryptodome: Import from meta-python") moved recipes from
meta-python to oe-core. In order for this to be communicated with users,
bump the LAYERVERSION so that meta-python can key of it in its
LAYERDEPENDS.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
---
 meta/conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf
index da93d64e0a..098ef12ac6 100644
--- a/meta/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ LAYERSERIES_CORENAMES = "dunfell gatesgarth"
 
 # This should only be incremented on significant changes that will
 # cause compatibility issues with other layers
-LAYERVERSION_core = "11"
+LAYERVERSION_core = "12"
 LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_core = "gatesgarth"
 
 BBLAYERS_LAYERINDEX_NAME_core = "openembedded-core"
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [OE-core][PATCH] Bump layer version

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 10:34 -0500, Joshua Watt wrote:
> The commits 910ffaf5be ("pyelftools: Import from meta-python") and
> a96f815c53 ("pycryptodome: Import from meta-python") moved recipes
> from
> meta-python to oe-core. In order for this to be communicated with
> users,
> bump the LAYERVERSION so that meta-python can key of it in its
> LAYERDEPENDS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/layer.conf | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf
> index da93d64e0a..098ef12ac6 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ LAYERSERIES_CORENAMES = "dunfell gatesgarth"
>  
>  # This should only be incremented on significant changes that will
>  # cause compatibility issues with other layers
> -LAYERVERSION_core = "11"
> +LAYERVERSION_core = "12"
>  LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_core = "gatesgarth"

I'm trying to work out if/where this helps. It can certainly help the
case where meta-oe is updated and core isn't as you can get an error.
Where you perhaps don't get one is where you update core but not meta-
oe.

Its almost as if you want core to error if meta-oe is too old too.

Cheers,

Richard

✗ patchtest: failure for Bump layer version

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: Bump layer version
Revision: 1
URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/24255/
State : failure

== Summary ==


Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:



* Patch            Bump layer version
 Issue             Shortlog does not follow expected format [test_shortlog_format] 
  Suggested fix    Commit shortlog (first line of commit message) should follow the format "<target>: <summary>"



If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
[PATCH v3] -> ...).

---
Guidelines:     https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite:     http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe