From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
Cc: "Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray@google.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
"Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
"Andreas Schwab" <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
"Joseph Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address on ARM
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:18:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211025121819.16f63048@ktm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871r4iftvc.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3087 bytes --]
Dear Community,
> * Szabolcs Nagy:
>
> > i don't know much about pelinking, but i'd expect that ld.so
> > has to be prelinked for it to work:
> >
> > if the kernel can load ld.so anywhere it will conflict with
> > other libraries that prelinking allocated to a fixed location.
>
> I think ld.so can back out prelinking if it detects any conflicts.
> (ld.so doesn't use MAP_FIXED for the initial ET_DYN mapping even when
> prelinking.)
>
> > instead ld.so has to be prelinked to an offset that comes after
> > all other prelinked libraries in the system, then the kernel
> > will place it after all other libraries at runtime.
> >
> > i don't have a prelinked system to check if this is the case.
>
> I tried on glibc 2.12-based system with prelink enabled and got this:
>
> # ldd /bin/bash
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffc7e798000)
> libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x0000003da9800000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003da7400000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003da7800000)
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8dc919c000)
> # ldd /bin/bash
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffef3bf4000)
> libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x0000003da9800000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003da7400000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003da7800000)
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff9e66a6000)
> # eu-readelf -d /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>
> Dynamic segment contains 25 entries:
> Addr: 0x0000003da7220df0 Offset: 0x020df0 Link to section: [ 5]
> '.dynstr' Type Value
> SONAME Library soname: [ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
> HASH 0x0000003da70001f0
> GNU_HASH 0x0000003da70002a8
> STRTAB 0x0000003da7000608
> SYMTAB 0x0000003da7000380
> STRSZ 380 (bytes)
> SYMENT 24 (bytes)
> PLTGOT 0x0000003da7220f80
> PLTRELSZ 144 (bytes)
> PLTREL RELA
> JMPREL 0x0000003da7000a30
> RELA 0x0000003da7000868
> RELASZ 456 (bytes)
> RELAENT 24 (bytes)
> VERDEF 0x0000003da70007c0
> VERDEFNUM 5
> BIND_NOW
> FLAGS_1 NOW
> VERSYM 0x0000003da7000784
> RELACOUNT 16
> CHECKSUM 0x00000000e90e92bc
> GNU_PRELINKED 0x00000000616d5a26
> NULL
> NULL
> NULL
> #
>
> As expected based on the previous discussion here, the kernel maps
> ld.so at random addresses even though it has been prelinked.
>
> This looks like another place where ASLR layout as to be tweaked
> carefully to avoid obscure failure modes.
>
Do we have any idea on how to move forward with this issue?
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210907131616.23472-1-lukma@denx.de>
[not found] ` <20211015075417.29931-1-lukma@denx.de>
[not found] ` <20211015120915.GD1982710@arm.com>
[not found] ` <CAMe9rOpPM7RmA65MzTNr2DtoC_wMFt87mnyJ4pgvmK5TAorCCQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-10-15 12:59 ` [PATCH v2] dl: Use "adr" assembler command to get proper load address on ARM Lukasz Majewski
[not found] ` <CAFP8O3+DBOregW5SuaPErkHUt+5aqb=bL98wHGtXu-OwFwud+w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20211018110818.GE1982710@arm.com>
[not found] ` <871r4iftvc.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
2021-10-19 12:03 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-10-25 10:18 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
[not found] ` <878ryhwgd7.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
2021-10-25 10:53 ` Lukasz Majewski
[not found] ` <20211025133425.GN1982710@arm.com>
2021-10-25 14:04 ` Lukasz Majewski
[not found] ` <20211025150904.GO1982710@arm.com>
2021-10-25 18:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110251718420.1572984@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
2021-10-26 13:52 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211025121819.16f63048@ktm \
--to=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox