* [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
@ 2024-07-23 11:53 Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/5] cve_check: Update selftest with new status detail Marta Rybczynska
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska, Samantha Jalabert
Add status information for each CVE under analysis.
Previously the information passed between different function of the
cve-check class included only tables of patched, unpatched, ignored
vulnerabilities and the general status of the recipe.
The VEX work requires more information, and we need to pass them
between different functions, so that it can be enriched as the
analysis progresses. Instead of multiple tables, use a single one
with annotations for each CVE encountered. For example, a patched
CVE will have:
{"abbrev-status": "Patched", "status": "version-not-in-range"}
abbrev-status contains the general status (Patched, Unpatched,
Ignored and Unknown that will be added in the VEX code)
status contains more detailed information that can come from
CVE_STATUS and the analysis.
Additional fields of the annotation include for example the name
of the patch file fixing a given CVE.
The side-effect of this change is that all entries from CVE_STATUS
are available in the result file. That includes entries from
the optional file cve-extra-exclusions.inc even if they might have
no link with the recipe (apply to a different package). This will
be fixed by moving all entries from that file to appropriate recipes.
From now on, CVE_STATUS should be added directly in the recipe file
or in include files added only to affected recipes.
Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <marta.rybczynska@syslinbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Samantha Jalabert <samantha.jalabert@syslinbit.com>
---
meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 208 +++++++++++++++++----------------
meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py | 12 +-
2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
index 93a2a1413d..504310514e 100644
--- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
@@ -188,10 +188,10 @@ python do_cve_check () {
patched_cves = get_patched_cves(d)
except FileNotFoundError:
bb.fatal("Failure in searching patches")
- ignored, patched, unpatched, status = check_cves(d, patched_cves)
- if patched or unpatched or (d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_COVERAGE") == "1" and status):
- cve_data = get_cve_info(d, patched + unpatched + ignored)
- cve_write_data(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, status)
+ cve_data, status = check_cves(d, patched_cves)
+ if len(cve_data) or (d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_COVERAGE") == "1" and status):
+ get_cve_info(d, cve_data)
+ cve_write_data(d, cve_data, status)
else:
bb.note("No CVE database found, skipping CVE check")
@@ -294,7 +294,51 @@ ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND:prepend = "${@'cve_check_write_rootfs_manifest ' if d
do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "${@'do_cve_check' if d.getVar('CVE_CHECK_CREATE_MANIFEST') == '1' else ''}"
do_populate_sdk[recrdeptask] += "${@'do_cve_check' if d.getVar('CVE_CHECK_CREATE_MANIFEST') == '1' else ''}"
-def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
+def cve_is_ignored(d, cve_data, cve):
+ if cve not in cve_data:
+ return False
+ if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Ignored":
+ return True
+ return False
+
+def cve_is_patched(d, cve_data, cve):
+ if cve not in cve_data:
+ return False
+ if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Patched":
+ return True
+ return False
+
+def cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, entry):
+ # If no entry, just add it
+ if cve not in cve_data:
+ cve_data[cve] = entry
+ return
+ # If we are updating, there might be change in the status
+ bb.debug("Trying CVE entry update for %s from %s to %s" % (cve, cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'], entry['abbrev-status']))
+ if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Unknown":
+ cve_data[cve] = entry
+ return
+ if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == entry['abbrev-status']:
+ return
+ # Update like in {'abbrev-status': 'Patched', 'status': 'version-not-in-range'} to {'abbrev-status': 'Unpatched', 'status': 'version-in-range'}
+ if entry['abbrev-status'] == "Unpatched" and cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Patched":
+ if entry['status'] == "version-in-range" and cve_data[cve]['status'] == "version-not-in-range":
+ # New result from the scan, vulnerable
+ cve_data[cve] = entry
+ bb.debug("CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result" % cve)
+ return
+ if entry['abbrev-status'] == "Patched" and cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Unpatched":
+ if entry['status'] == "version-not-in-range" and cve_data[cve]['status'] == "version-in-range":
+ # Range does not match the scan, but we already have a vulnerable match, ignore
+ bb.debug("CVE entry %s update from Patched to Unpatched from the scan result - not applying" % cve)
+ return
+ # If we have an "Ignored", it has a priority
+ if cve_data[cve]['abbrev-status'] == "Ignored":
+ bb.debug("CVE %s not updating because Ignored" % cve)
+ return
+ bb.warn("Unhandled CVE entry update for %s from %s to %s" % (cve, cve_data[cve], entry))
+
+def check_cves(d, cve_data):
"""
Connect to the NVD database and find unpatched cves.
"""
@@ -304,28 +348,19 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
real_pv = d.getVar("PV")
suffix = d.getVar("CVE_VERSION_SUFFIX")
- cves_unpatched = []
- cves_ignored = []
cves_status = []
cves_in_recipe = False
# CVE_PRODUCT can contain more than one product (eg. curl/libcurl)
products = d.getVar("CVE_PRODUCT").split()
# If this has been unset then we're not scanning for CVEs here (for example, image recipes)
if not products:
- return ([], [], [], [])
+ return ([], [])
pv = d.getVar("CVE_VERSION").split("+git")[0]
# If the recipe has been skipped/ignored we return empty lists
if pn in d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SKIP_RECIPE").split():
bb.note("Recipe has been skipped by cve-check")
- return ([], [], [], [])
-
- # Convert CVE_STATUS into ignored CVEs and check validity
- cve_ignore = []
- for cve in (d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}):
- decoded_status, _, _ = decode_cve_status(d, cve)
- if decoded_status == "Ignored":
- cve_ignore.append(cve)
+ return ([], [])
import sqlite3
db_file = d.expand("file:${CVE_CHECK_DB_FILE}?mode=ro")
@@ -344,11 +379,10 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
for cverow in cve_cursor:
cve = cverow[0]
- if cve in cve_ignore:
+ if cve_is_ignored(d, cve_data, cve):
bb.note("%s-%s ignores %s" % (product, pv, cve))
- cves_ignored.append(cve)
continue
- elif cve in patched_cves:
+ elif cve_is_patched(d, cve_data, cve):
bb.note("%s has been patched" % (cve))
continue
# Write status once only for each product
@@ -364,7 +398,7 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
for row in product_cursor:
(_, _, _, version_start, operator_start, version_end, operator_end) = row
#bb.debug(2, "Evaluating row " + str(row))
- if cve in cve_ignore:
+ if cve_is_ignored(d, cve_data, cve):
ignored = True
version_start = convert_cve_version(version_start)
@@ -403,16 +437,16 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
if vulnerable:
if ignored:
bb.note("%s is ignored in %s-%s" % (cve, pn, real_pv))
- cves_ignored.append(cve)
+ cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, {"abbrev-status": "Ignored"})
else:
bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (pn, real_pv, cve))
- cves_unpatched.append(cve)
+ cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, {"abbrev-status": "Unpatched", "status": "version-in-range"})
break
product_cursor.close()
if not vulnerable:
bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (pn, real_pv, cve))
- patched_cves.add(cve)
+ cve_update(d, cve_data, cve, {"abbrev-status": "Patched", "status": "version-not-in-range"})
cve_cursor.close()
if not cves_in_product:
@@ -420,48 +454,45 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
cves_status.append([product, False])
conn.close()
- diff_ignore = list(set(cve_ignore) - set(cves_ignored))
- if diff_ignore:
- oe.qa.handle_error("cve_status_not_in_db", "Found CVE (%s) with CVE_STATUS set that are not found in database for this component" % " ".join(diff_ignore), d)
if not cves_in_recipe:
bb.note("No CVE records for products in recipe %s" % (pn))
- return (list(cves_ignored), list(patched_cves), cves_unpatched, cves_status)
+ return (cve_data, cves_status)
-def get_cve_info(d, cves):
+def get_cve_info(d, cve_data):
"""
Get CVE information from the database.
"""
import sqlite3
- cve_data = {}
db_file = d.expand("file:${CVE_CHECK_DB_FILE}?mode=ro")
conn = sqlite3.connect(db_file, uri=True)
- for cve in cves:
+ for cve in cve_data:
cursor = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM NVD WHERE ID IS ?", (cve,))
for row in cursor:
- cve_data[row[0]] = {}
- cve_data[row[0]]["summary"] = row[1]
- cve_data[row[0]]["scorev2"] = row[2]
- cve_data[row[0]]["scorev3"] = row[3]
- cve_data[row[0]]["modified"] = row[4]
- cve_data[row[0]]["vector"] = row[5]
- cve_data[row[0]]["vectorString"] = row[6]
+ # The CVE itdelf has been added already
+ if row[0] not in cve_data:
+ bb.note("CVE record %s not present" % row[0])
+ continue
+ #cve_data[row[0]] = {}
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-summary"] = row[1]
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-scorev2"] = row[2]
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-scorev3"] = row[3]
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-modified"] = row[4]
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-vector"] = row[5]
+ cve_data[row[0]]["NVD-vectorString"] = row[6]
cursor.close()
conn.close()
- return cve_data
-def cve_write_data_text(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data):
+def cve_write_data_text(d, cve_data):
"""
Write CVE information in WORKDIR; and to CVE_CHECK_DIR, and
CVE manifest if enabled.
"""
- from oe.cve_check import decode_cve_status
-
cve_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_LOG")
fdir_name = d.getVar("FILE_DIRNAME")
layer = fdir_name.split("/")[-3]
@@ -478,7 +509,7 @@ def cve_write_data_text(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data):
return
# Early exit, the text format does not report packages without CVEs
- if not patched+unpatched+ignored:
+ if not len(cve_data):
return
nvd_link = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/"
@@ -487,36 +518,29 @@ def cve_write_data_text(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data):
bb.utils.mkdirhier(os.path.dirname(cve_file))
for cve in sorted(cve_data):
- is_patched = cve in patched
- is_ignored = cve in ignored
-
- status = "Unpatched"
- if (is_patched or is_ignored) and not report_all:
+ if not report_all and (cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"] == "Patched" or cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"] == "Ignored"):
continue
- if is_ignored:
- status = "Ignored"
- elif is_patched:
- status = "Patched"
- else:
- # default value of status is Unpatched
- unpatched_cves.append(cve)
-
write_string += "LAYER: %s\n" % layer
write_string += "PACKAGE NAME: %s\n" % d.getVar("PN")
write_string += "PACKAGE VERSION: %s%s\n" % (d.getVar("EXTENDPE"), d.getVar("PV"))
write_string += "CVE: %s\n" % cve
- write_string += "CVE STATUS: %s\n" % status
- _, detail, description = decode_cve_status(d, cve)
- if detail:
- write_string += "CVE DETAIL: %s\n" % detail
- if description:
- write_string += "CVE DESCRIPTION: %s\n" % description
- write_string += "CVE SUMMARY: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["summary"]
- write_string += "CVSS v2 BASE SCORE: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["scorev2"]
- write_string += "CVSS v3 BASE SCORE: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["scorev3"]
- write_string += "VECTOR: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["vector"]
- write_string += "VECTORSTRING: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["vectorString"]
+ write_string += "CVE STATUS: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"]
+
+ if 'status' in cve_data[cve]:
+ write_string += "CVE DETAIL: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["status"]
+ if 'justification' in cve_data[cve]:
+ write_string += "CVE DESCRIPTION: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["justification"]
+
+ if "NVD-summary" in cve_data[cve]:
+ write_string += "CVE SUMMARY: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["NVD-summary"]
+ write_string += "CVSS v2 BASE SCORE: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev2"]
+ write_string += "CVSS v3 BASE SCORE: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev3"]
+ write_string += "VECTOR: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["NVD-vector"]
+ write_string += "VECTORSTRING: %s\n" % cve_data[cve]["NVD-vectorString"]
+
write_string += "MORE INFORMATION: %s%s\n\n" % (nvd_link, cve)
+ if cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"] == "Unpatched":
+ unpatched_cves.append(cve)
if unpatched_cves and d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SHOW_WARNINGS") == "1":
bb.warn("Found unpatched CVE (%s), for more information check %s" % (" ".join(unpatched_cves),cve_file))
@@ -568,13 +592,11 @@ def cve_check_write_json_output(d, output, direct_file, deploy_file, manifest_fi
with open(index_path, "a+") as f:
f.write("%s\n" % fragment_path)
-def cve_write_data_json(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, cve_status):
+def cve_write_data_json(d, cve_data, cve_status):
"""
Prepare CVE data for the JSON format, then write it.
"""
- from oe.cve_check import decode_cve_status
-
output = {"version":"1", "package": []}
nvd_link = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/"
@@ -592,8 +614,6 @@ def cve_write_data_json(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, cve_status):
if include_layers and layer not in include_layers:
return
- unpatched_cves = []
-
product_data = []
for s in cve_status:
p = {"product": s[0], "cvesInRecord": "Yes"}
@@ -608,39 +628,31 @@ def cve_write_data_json(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, cve_status):
"version" : package_version,
"products": product_data
}
+
cve_list = []
for cve in sorted(cve_data):
- is_patched = cve in patched
- is_ignored = cve in ignored
- status = "Unpatched"
- if (is_patched or is_ignored) and not report_all:
+ if not report_all and (cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"] == "Patched" or cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"] == "Ignored"):
continue
- if is_ignored:
- status = "Ignored"
- elif is_patched:
- status = "Patched"
- else:
- # default value of status is Unpatched
- unpatched_cves.append(cve)
-
issue_link = "%s%s" % (nvd_link, cve)
cve_item = {
"id" : cve,
- "summary" : cve_data[cve]["summary"],
- "scorev2" : cve_data[cve]["scorev2"],
- "scorev3" : cve_data[cve]["scorev3"],
- "vector" : cve_data[cve]["vector"],
- "vectorString" : cve_data[cve]["vectorString"],
- "status" : status,
- "link": issue_link
+ "status" : cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"],
+ "link": issue_link,
}
- _, detail, description = decode_cve_status(d, cve)
- if detail:
- cve_item["detail"] = detail
- if description:
- cve_item["description"] = description
+ if 'NVD-summary' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["summary"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-summary"]
+ cve_item["scorev2"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev2"]
+ cve_item["scorev3"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev3"]
+ cve_item["vector"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-vector"]
+ cve_item["vectorString"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-vectorString"]
+ if 'status' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["detail"] = cve_data[cve]["status"]
+ if 'justification' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["description"] = cve_data[cve]["justification"]
+ if 'resource' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["patch-file"] = cve_data[cve]["resource"]
cve_list.append(cve_item)
package_data["issue"] = cve_list
@@ -652,12 +664,12 @@ def cve_write_data_json(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, cve_status):
cve_check_write_json_output(d, output, direct_file, deploy_file, manifest_file)
-def cve_write_data(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, status):
+def cve_write_data(d, cve_data, status):
"""
Write CVE data in each enabled format.
"""
if d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_FORMAT_TEXT") == "1":
- cve_write_data_text(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data)
+ cve_write_data_text(d, cve_data)
if d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_FORMAT_JSON") == "1":
- cve_write_data_json(d, patched, unpatched, ignored, cve_data, status)
+ cve_write_data_json(d, cve_data, status)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py b/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py
index ed5c714cb8..6aba90183a 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/cve_check.py
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ def get_patched_cves(d):
# (cve_match regular expression)
cve_file_name_match = re.compile(r".*(CVE-\d{4}-\d+)", re.IGNORECASE)
- patched_cves = set()
+ patched_cves = {}
patches = oe.patch.src_patches(d)
bb.debug(2, "Scanning %d patches for CVEs" % len(patches))
for url in patches:
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ def get_patched_cves(d):
fname_match = cve_file_name_match.search(patch_file)
if fname_match:
cve = fname_match.group(1).upper()
- patched_cves.add(cve)
+ patched_cves[cve] = {"abbrev-status": "Patched", "status": "fix-file-included", "resource": patch_file}
bb.debug(2, "Found %s from patch file name %s" % (cve, patch_file))
# Remote patches won't be present and compressed patches won't be
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ def get_patched_cves(d):
cves = patch_text[match.start()+5:match.end()]
for cve in cves.split():
bb.debug(2, "Patch %s solves %s" % (patch_file, cve))
- patched_cves.add(cve)
+ patched_cves[cve] = {"abbrev-status": "Patched", "status": "fix-file-included", "resource": patch_file}
text_match = True
if not fname_match and not text_match:
@@ -132,10 +132,8 @@ def get_patched_cves(d):
# Search for additional patched CVEs
for cve in (d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}):
- decoded_status, _, _ = decode_cve_status(d, cve)
- if decoded_status == "Patched":
- bb.debug(2, "CVE %s is additionally patched" % cve)
- patched_cves.add(cve)
+ decoded_status, detail, description = decode_cve_status(d, cve)
+ patched_cves[cve] = {"abbrev-status": decoded_status, "status": detail, "justification": description}
return patched_cves
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/5] cve_check: Update selftest with new status detail
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 11:53 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class Marta Rybczynska
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Samantha Jalabert
From: Samantha Jalabert <samantha.jalabert@syslinbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Samantha Jalabert <samantha.jalabert@syslinbit.com>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py
index 60cecd1328..a40272c919 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py
@@ -217,9 +217,10 @@ CVE_CHECK_REPORT_PATCHED = "1"
# m4 CVE should not be in logrotate
self.assertNotIn("CVE-2008-1687", found_cves)
# logrotate has both Patched and Ignored CVEs
+ detail = "version-not-in-range"
self.assertIn("CVE-2011-1098", found_cves)
self.assertEqual(found_cves["CVE-2011-1098"]["status"], "Patched")
- self.assertEqual(len(found_cves["CVE-2011-1098"]["detail"]), 0)
+ self.assertEqual(found_cves["CVE-2011-1098"]["detail"], detail)
self.assertEqual(len(found_cves["CVE-2011-1098"]["description"]), 0)
detail = "not-applicable-platform"
description = "CVE is debian, gentoo or SUSE specific on the way logrotate was installed/used"
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/5] cve_check: Update selftest with new status detail Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 11:53 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-24 4:57 ` Jörg Sommer
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 4/5] cve-check-map: add new statuses Marta Rybczynska
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska, Samantha Jalabert
The "vex" class generates the minimum information that is necessary
for VEX generation by an external CVE checking tool. It is a drop-in
replacement of "cve-check". It uses the same variables from recipes
to make the migration and backporting easier.
The goal if this class is to allow generation of the CVE list of
an image or distribution on-demand, including the latest information
from vulnerability databases. Vulnerability data changes every day,
so a status generated at build becomes out-of-date very soon.
Research done for this work shows that the current VEX formats (CSAF
and OpenVEX) do not provide enough information to generate such
rolling information. Instead, we extract the needed data from recipe
annotations (package names, CPEs, versions, CVE patches applied...)
and store for later use in the format that is an extension of the
CVE-check JSON output format.
This output can be then used (separately or with SPDX of the same
build) by an external tool to generate the vulnerability annotation
and VEX statements in standard formats.
Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <marta.rybczynska@syslinbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Samantha Jalabert <samantha.jalabert@syslinbit.com>
---
meta/classes/vex.bbclass | 310 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 310 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/classes/vex.bbclass
diff --git a/meta/classes/vex.bbclass b/meta/classes/vex.bbclass
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..bb16e2a529
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/classes/vex.bbclass
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+#
+# Copyright OpenEmbedded Contributors
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+#
+
+# This class is used to generate metadata needed by external
+# tools to check for vulnerabilities, for example CVEs.
+#
+# In order to use this class just inherit the class in the
+# local.conf file and it will add the generate_vex task for
+# every recipe. If an image is build it will generate a report
+# in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE for all the packages used, it will also
+# generate a file for all recipes used in the build.
+#
+# Variables use CVE_CHECK prefix to keep compatibility with
+# the cve-check class
+#
+# Example:
+# bitbake -c generate_vex openssl
+# bitbake core-image-sato
+# bitbake -k -c generate_vex universe
+#
+# The product name that the CVE database uses defaults to BPN, but may need to
+# be overriden per recipe (for example tiff.bb sets CVE_PRODUCT=libtiff).
+CVE_PRODUCT ??= "${BPN}"
+CVE_VERSION ??= "${PV}"
+
+CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_DIR ?= "${LOG_DIR}/cve"
+
+CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_FILE_NAME_JSON = "cve-summary.json"
+CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_INDEX_PATH = "${CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_DIR}/cve-summary-index.txt"
+
+CVE_CHECK_DIR ??= "${DEPLOY_DIR}/cve"
+CVE_CHECK_RECIPE_FILE_JSON ?= "${CVE_CHECK_DIR}/${PN}_cve.json"
+CVE_CHECK_MANIFEST_JSON ?= "${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_NAME}.json"
+
+# Skip CVE Check for packages (PN)
+CVE_CHECK_SKIP_RECIPE ?= ""
+
+# Replace NVD DB check status for a given CVE. Each of CVE has to be mentioned
+# separately with optional detail and description for this status.
+#
+# CVE_STATUS[CVE-1234-0001] = "not-applicable-platform: Issue only applies on Windows"
+# CVE_STATUS[CVE-1234-0002] = "fixed-version: Fixed externally"
+#
+# Settings the same status and reason for multiple CVEs is possible
+# via CVE_STATUS_GROUPS variable.
+#
+# CVE_STATUS_GROUPS = "CVE_STATUS_WIN CVE_STATUS_PATCHED"
+#
+# CVE_STATUS_WIN = "CVE-1234-0001 CVE-1234-0003"
+# CVE_STATUS_WIN[status] = "not-applicable-platform: Issue only applies on Windows"
+# CVE_STATUS_PATCHED = "CVE-1234-0002 CVE-1234-0004"
+# CVE_STATUS_PATCHED[status] = "fixed-version: Fixed externally"
+#
+# All possible CVE statuses could be found in cve-check-map.conf
+# CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[not-applicable-platform] = "Ignored"
+# CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[fixed-version] = "Patched"
+#
+# CVE_CHECK_IGNORE is deprecated and CVE_STATUS has to be used instead.
+# Keep CVE_CHECK_IGNORE until other layers migrate to new variables
+CVE_CHECK_IGNORE ?= ""
+
+# Layers to be excluded
+CVE_CHECK_LAYER_EXCLUDELIST ??= ""
+
+# Layers to be included
+CVE_CHECK_LAYER_INCLUDELIST ??= ""
+
+
+# set to "alphabetical" for version using single alphabetical character as increment release
+CVE_VERSION_SUFFIX ??= ""
+
+python () {
+ if bb.data.inherits_class("cve-check", d):
+ raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("Skipping recipe: found incompatible combination of cve-check and vex enabled at the same time.")
+
+ # Fallback all CVEs from CVE_CHECK_IGNORE to CVE_STATUS
+ cve_check_ignore = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_IGNORE")
+ if cve_check_ignore:
+ bb.warn("CVE_CHECK_IGNORE is deprecated in favor of CVE_STATUS")
+ for cve in (d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_IGNORE") or "").split():
+ d.setVarFlag("CVE_STATUS", cve, "ignored")
+
+ # Process CVE_STATUS_GROUPS to set multiple statuses and optional detail or description at once
+ for cve_status_group in (d.getVar("CVE_STATUS_GROUPS") or "").split():
+ cve_group = d.getVar(cve_status_group)
+ if cve_group is not None:
+ for cve in cve_group.split():
+ d.setVarFlag("CVE_STATUS", cve, d.getVarFlag(cve_status_group, "status"))
+ else:
+ bb.warn("CVE_STATUS_GROUPS contains undefined variable %s" % cve_status_group)
+}
+
+def generate_json_report(d, out_path, link_path):
+ if os.path.exists(d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_INDEX_PATH")):
+ import json
+ from oe.cve_check import cve_check_merge_jsons, update_symlinks
+
+ bb.note("Generating JSON CVE summary")
+ index_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_INDEX_PATH")
+ summary = {"version":"1", "package": []}
+ with open(index_file) as f:
+ filename = f.readline()
+ while filename:
+ with open(filename.rstrip()) as j:
+ data = json.load(j)
+ cve_check_merge_jsons(summary, data)
+ filename = f.readline()
+
+ summary["package"].sort(key=lambda d: d['name'])
+
+ with open(out_path, "w") as f:
+ json.dump(summary, f, indent=2)
+
+ update_symlinks(out_path, link_path)
+
+python vex_save_summary_handler () {
+ import shutil
+ import datetime
+ from oe.cve_check import update_symlinks
+
+ cvelogpath = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_DIR")
+
+ bb.utils.mkdirhier(cvelogpath)
+ timestamp = datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d%H%M%S')
+
+ json_summary_link_name = os.path.join(cvelogpath, d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_FILE_NAME_JSON"))
+ json_summary_name = os.path.join(cvelogpath, "cve-summary-%s.json" % (timestamp))
+ generate_json_report(d, json_summary_name, json_summary_link_name)
+ bb.plain("Complete CVE JSON report summary created at: %s" % json_summary_link_name)
+}
+
+addhandler vex_save_summary_handler
+vex_save_summary_handler[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted"
+
+python do_generate_vex () {
+ """
+ Generate metadata needed for vulnerability checking for
+ the current recipe
+ """
+ from oe.cve_check import get_patched_cves
+
+ try:
+ patched_cves = get_patched_cves(d)
+ cves_status = []
+ products = d.getVar("CVE_PRODUCT").split()
+ for product in products:
+ if ":" in product:
+ _, product = product.split(":", 1)
+ cves_status.append([product, False])
+
+ except FileNotFoundError:
+ bb.fatal("Failure in searching patches")
+
+ cve_write_data_json(d, patched_cves, cves_status)
+}
+
+addtask generate_vex before do_build
+
+python vex_cleanup () {
+ """
+ Delete the file used to gather all the CVE information.
+ """
+ bb.utils.remove(e.data.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_INDEX_PATH"))
+}
+
+addhandler vex_cleanup
+vex_cleanup[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted"
+
+python vex_write_rootfs_manifest () {
+ """
+ Create VEX/CVE manifest when building an image
+ """
+
+ import json
+ from oe.rootfs import image_list_installed_packages
+ from oe.cve_check import cve_check_merge_jsons, update_symlinks
+
+ deploy_file_json = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_RECIPE_FILE_JSON")
+ if os.path.exists(deploy_file_json):
+ bb.utils.remove(deploy_file_json)
+
+ # Create a list of relevant recipies
+ recipies = set()
+ for pkg in list(image_list_installed_packages(d)):
+ pkg_info = os.path.join(d.getVar('PKGDATA_DIR'),
+ 'runtime-reverse', pkg)
+ pkg_data = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(pkg_info)
+ recipies.add(pkg_data["PN"])
+
+ bb.note("Writing rootfs VEX manifest")
+ deploy_dir = d.getVar("IMGDEPLOYDIR")
+ link_name = d.getVar("IMAGE_LINK_NAME")
+
+ json_data = {"version":"1", "package": []}
+ text_data = ""
+
+ save_pn = d.getVar("PN")
+
+ for pkg in recipies:
+ # To be able to use the CVE_CHECK_RECIPE_FILE_JSON variable we have to evaluate
+ # it with the different PN names set each time.
+ d.setVar("PN", pkg)
+
+ pkgfilepath = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_RECIPE_FILE_JSON")
+ if os.path.exists(pkgfilepath):
+ with open(pkgfilepath) as j:
+ data = json.load(j)
+ cve_check_merge_jsons(json_data, data)
+
+ d.setVar("PN", save_pn)
+
+ link_path = os.path.join(deploy_dir, "%s.json" % link_name)
+ manifest_name = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_MANIFEST_JSON")
+
+ with open(manifest_name, "w") as f:
+ json.dump(json_data, f, indent=2)
+
+ update_symlinks(manifest_name, link_path)
+ bb.plain("Image VEX JSON report stored in: %s" % manifest_name)
+}
+
+ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND:prepend = "vex_write_rootfs_manifest; "
+do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "do_generate_vex "
+do_populate_sdk[recrdeptask] += "do_generate_vex "
+
+def cve_write_data_json(d, cve_data, cve_status):
+ """
+ Prepare CVE data for the JSON format, then write it.
+ Done for each recipe.
+ """
+
+ from oe.cve_check import get_cpe_ids
+ import json
+
+ output = {"version":"1", "package": []}
+ nvd_link = "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/"
+
+ fdir_name = d.getVar("FILE_DIRNAME")
+ layer = fdir_name.split("/")[-3]
+
+ include_layers = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_LAYER_INCLUDELIST").split()
+ exclude_layers = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_LAYER_EXCLUDELIST").split()
+
+ if exclude_layers and layer in exclude_layers:
+ return
+
+ if include_layers and layer not in include_layers:
+ return
+
+ product_data = []
+ for s in cve_status:
+ p = {"product": s[0], "cvesInRecord": "Yes"}
+ if s[1] == False:
+ p["cvesInRecord"] = "No"
+ product_data.append(p)
+ product_data = list({p['product']:p for p in product_data}.values())
+
+ package_version = "%s%s" % (d.getVar("EXTENDPE"), d.getVar("PV"))
+ cpes = get_cpe_ids(d.getVar("CVE_PRODUCT"), d.getVar("CVE_VERSION"))
+ package_data = {
+ "name" : d.getVar("PN"),
+ "layer" : layer,
+ "version" : package_version,
+ "products": product_data,
+ "cpes": cpes
+ }
+
+ cve_list = []
+
+ for cve in sorted(cve_data):
+ issue_link = "%s%s" % (nvd_link, cve)
+
+ cve_item = {
+ "id" : cve,
+ "status" : cve_data[cve]["abbrev-status"],
+ "link": issue_link,
+ }
+ if 'NVD-summary' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["summary"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-summary"]
+ cve_item["scorev2"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev2"]
+ cve_item["scorev3"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-scorev3"]
+ cve_item["vector"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-vector"]
+ cve_item["vectorString"] = cve_data[cve]["NVD-vectorString"]
+ if 'status' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["detail"] = cve_data[cve]["status"]
+ if 'justification' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["description"] = cve_data[cve]["justification"]
+ if 'resource' in cve_data[cve]:
+ cve_item["patch-file"] = cve_data[cve]["resource"]
+ cve_list.append(cve_item)
+
+ package_data["issue"] = cve_list
+ output["package"].append(package_data)
+
+ deploy_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_RECIPE_FILE_JSON")
+
+ write_string = json.dumps(output, indent=2)
+
+ cvelogpath = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_DIR")
+ index_path = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_INDEX_PATH")
+ bb.utils.mkdirhier(cvelogpath)
+ fragment_file = os.path.basename(deploy_file)
+ fragment_path = os.path.join(cvelogpath, fragment_file)
+ with open(fragment_path, "w") as f:
+ f.write(write_string)
+ with open(index_path, "a+") as f:
+ f.write("%s\n" % fragment_path)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-24 4:57 ` Jörg Sommer
2024-07-24 16:11 ` Marta Rybczynska
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jörg Sommer @ 2024-07-24 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rybczynska; +Cc: openembedded-core, Marta Rybczynska, Samantha Jalabert
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 495 bytes --]
Marta Rybczynska via lists.openembedded.org schrieb am Di 23. Jul, 13:53 (GMT):
> The "vex" class generates the minimum information that is necessary
> for VEX generation by an external CVE checking tool. It is a drop-in
> replacement of "cve-check". It uses the same variables from recipes
> to make the migration and backporting easier.
>
> The goal if this class is to allow generation of the CVE list of
Should there be an “of” instead of “goal if this”?
Regards Jörg
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5068 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class
2024-07-24 4:57 ` Jörg Sommer
@ 2024-07-24 16:11 ` Marta Rybczynska
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-24 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: joerg.sommer; +Cc: openembedded-core, Marta Rybczynska, Samantha Jalabert
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:57 AM Jörg Sommer via lists.openembedded.org
<joerg.sommer=navimatix.de@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> Marta Rybczynska via lists.openembedded.org schrieb am Di 23. Jul, 13:53
> (GMT):
> > The "vex" class generates the minimum information that is necessary
> > for VEX generation by an external CVE checking tool. It is a drop-in
> > replacement of "cve-check". It uses the same variables from recipes
> > to make the migration and backporting easier.
> >
> > The goal if this class is to allow generation of the CVE list of
>
> Should there be an “of” instead of “goal if this”?
>
Yes, fixed in v3.
Kind regards,
Marta
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1229 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [OE-core][PATCH v2 4/5] cve-check-map: add new statuses
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/5] cve_check: Update selftest with new status detail Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 11:53 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 5/5] cve-extra-exclusions.inc: add deprecation notice Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis patchtest
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska, Samantha Jalabert
Add 'fix-file-included', 'version-not-in-range' and 'version-in-range' generated
by the cve-check.
'fix-file-included' means that a fix file for the CVE has been located.
'version-not-in-range' means that the product version has been found outside of
the vulnerable range.
'version-in-range' means that the product version has been found inside of the
vulnerable range.
Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <marta.rybczynska@syslinbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Samantha Jalabert <samantha.jalabert@syslinbit.com>
---
meta/conf/cve-check-map.conf | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/conf/cve-check-map.conf b/meta/conf/cve-check-map.conf
index 17b0f15571..ac956379d1 100644
--- a/meta/conf/cve-check-map.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/cve-check-map.conf
@@ -8,11 +8,17 @@ CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[backported-patch] = "Patched"
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[cpe-stable-backport] = "Patched"
# use when NVD DB does not mention correct version or does not mention any verion at all
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[fixed-version] = "Patched"
+# use when a fix file has been included (set automatically)
+CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[fix-file-included] = "Patched"
+# do not use directly: automatic scan reports version number NOT in the vulnerable range (set automatically)
+CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[version-not-in-range] = "Patched"
# used internally by this class if CVE vulnerability is detected which is not marked as fixed or ignored
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[unpatched] = "Unpatched"
# use when CVE is confirmed by upstream but fix is still not available
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[vulnerable-investigating] = "Unpatched"
+# do not use directly: automatic scan reports version number IS in the vulnerable range (set automatically)
+CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[version-in-range] = "Unpatched"
# used for migration from old concept, do not use for new vulnerabilities
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[ignored] = "Ignored"
@@ -26,3 +32,6 @@ CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[not-applicable-config] = "Ignored"
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[not-applicable-platform] = "Ignored"
# use when upstream acknowledged the vulnerability but does not plan to fix it
CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[upstream-wontfix] = "Ignored"
+
+# use when it is impossible to conclude if the vulnerability is present or not
+CVE_CHECK_STATUSMAP[unknown] = "Unknown"
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [OE-core][PATCH v2 5/5] cve-extra-exclusions.inc: add deprecation notice
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 4/5] cve-check-map: add new statuses Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 11:53 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis patchtest
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Marta Rybczynska
This file contains CVE_STATUS without machine-readable information on which
recipe it applies to. All entries should be verified and, if appropriate,
moved to their corresponding recipes.
Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <marta.rybczynska@syslinbit.com>
---
| 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--git a/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc
index fcef6a14fb..71c5bc31f8 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+# THIS FILE IS DEPRECATED, DO NOT ADD NEW ENTRIES
+# All entries from this file should migrate to appropriate recipes.
+#
# This file contains a list of CVE's where resolution has proven to be impractical
# or there is no reasonable action the Yocto Project can take to resolve the issue.
# It contains all the information we are aware of about an issue and analysis about
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 5/5] cve-extra-exclusions.inc: add deprecation notice Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 12:12 ` patchtest
2024-07-23 15:41 ` Marta Rybczynska
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: patchtest @ 2024-07-23 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Rybczynska; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3073 bytes --]
Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one
or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for
more information:
---
Testing patch /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/v2-1-5-cve-check-annotate-CVEs-during-analysis.patch
FAIL: test Signed-off-by presence: Mbox is missing Signed-off-by. Add it manually or with "git commit --amend -s" (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_signed_off_by_presence)
PASS: pretest pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.pretest_pylint)
PASS: test author valid (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_author_valid)
PASS: test commit message presence (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_commit_message_presence)
PASS: test max line length (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_max_line_length)
PASS: test mbox format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_mbox_format)
PASS: test non-AUH upgrade (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_non_auh_upgrade)
PASS: test pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.test_pylint)
PASS: test shortlog format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_format)
PASS: test shortlog length (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_length)
SKIP: pretest src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest (test_metadata.TestMetadata.pretest_src_uri_left_files)
SKIP: test CVE check ignore: No modified recipes or older target branch, skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_cve_check_ignore)
SKIP: test CVE tag format: No new CVE patches introduced (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format)
SKIP: test Signed-off-by presence: No new CVE patches introduced (test_patch.TestPatch.test_signed_off_by_presence)
SKIP: test Upstream-Status presence: No new CVE patches introduced (test_patch.TestPatch.test_upstream_status_presence_format)
SKIP: test bugzilla entry format: No bug ID found (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_bugzilla_entry_format)
SKIP: test lic files chksum modified not mentioned: No modified recipes, skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned)
SKIP: test lic files chksum presence: No added recipes, skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_presence)
SKIP: test license presence: No added recipes, skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_license_presence)
SKIP: test series merge on head: Merge test is disabled for now (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_series_merge_on_head)
SKIP: test src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_src_uri_left_files)
SKIP: test summary presence: No added recipes, skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_summary_presence)
SKIP: test target mailing list: Series merged, no reason to check other mailing lists (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_target_mailing_list)
---
Please address the issues identified and
submit a new revision of the patch, or alternatively, reply to this
email with an explanation of why the patch should be accepted. If you
believe these results are due to an error in patchtest, please submit a
bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ (use the 'Patchtest' category
under 'Yocto Project Subprojects'). For more information on specific
failures, see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Patchtest. Thank
you!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis patchtest
@ 2024-07-23 15:41 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 23:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-23 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: patchtest; +Cc: openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3492 bytes --]
This seems to be a false positive. Possibly the path 2/5 has an issue. I'm
looking into the source code of patchtest to verify.
Regards,
Marta
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM <patchtest@automation.yoctoproject.org>
wrote:
> Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one
> or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for
> more information:
>
> ---
> Testing patch
> /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/v2-1-5-cve-check-annotate-CVEs-during-analysis.patch
>
> FAIL: test Signed-off-by presence: Mbox is missing Signed-off-by. Add it
> manually or with "git commit --amend -s"
> (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_signed_off_by_presence)
>
> PASS: pretest pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.pretest_pylint)
> PASS: test author valid (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_author_valid)
> PASS: test commit message presence
> (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_commit_message_presence)
> PASS: test max line length
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_max_line_length)
> PASS: test mbox format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_mbox_format)
> PASS: test non-AUH upgrade (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_non_auh_upgrade)
> PASS: test pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.test_pylint)
> PASS: test shortlog format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_format)
> PASS: test shortlog length (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_length)
>
> SKIP: pretest src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.pretest_src_uri_left_files)
> SKIP: test CVE check ignore: No modified recipes or older target branch,
> skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_cve_check_ignore)
> SKIP: test CVE tag format: No new CVE patches introduced
> (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format)
> SKIP: test Signed-off-by presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> (test_patch.TestPatch.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> SKIP: test Upstream-Status presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> (test_patch.TestPatch.test_upstream_status_presence_format)
> SKIP: test bugzilla entry format: No bug ID found
> (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_bugzilla_entry_format)
> SKIP: test lic files chksum modified not mentioned: No modified recipes,
> skipping test
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned)
> SKIP: test lic files chksum presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_presence)
> SKIP: test license presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_license_presence)
> SKIP: test series merge on head: Merge test is disabled for now
> (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_series_merge_on_head)
> SKIP: test src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_src_uri_left_files)
> SKIP: test summary presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_summary_presence)
> SKIP: test target mailing list: Series merged, no reason to check other
> mailing lists (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_target_mailing_list)
>
> ---
>
> Please address the issues identified and
> submit a new revision of the patch, or alternatively, reply to this
> email with an explanation of why the patch should be accepted. If you
> believe these results are due to an error in patchtest, please submit a
> bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ (use the 'Patchtest' category
> under 'Yocto Project Subprojects'). For more information on specific
> failures, see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Patchtest. Thank
> you!
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4065 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
2024-07-23 15:41 ` Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-23 23:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-07-24 4:31 ` Marta Rybczynska
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2024-07-23 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Rybczynska; +Cc: patchtest, openembedded-core
On 23/07/2024 17:41:40+0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> This seems to be a false positive. Possibly the path 2/5 has an issue. I'm
> looking into the source code of patchtest to verify.
It is not, 2/5 is missing your SoB
>
> Regards,
> Marta
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM <patchtest@automation.yoctoproject.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one
> > or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for
> > more information:
> >
> > ---
> > Testing patch
> > /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/v2-1-5-cve-check-annotate-CVEs-during-analysis.patch
> >
> > FAIL: test Signed-off-by presence: Mbox is missing Signed-off-by. Add it
> > manually or with "git commit --amend -s"
> > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> >
> > PASS: pretest pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.pretest_pylint)
> > PASS: test author valid (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_author_valid)
> > PASS: test commit message presence
> > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_commit_message_presence)
> > PASS: test max line length
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_max_line_length)
> > PASS: test mbox format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_mbox_format)
> > PASS: test non-AUH upgrade (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_non_auh_upgrade)
> > PASS: test pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.test_pylint)
> > PASS: test shortlog format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_format)
> > PASS: test shortlog length (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_length)
> >
> > SKIP: pretest src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.pretest_src_uri_left_files)
> > SKIP: test CVE check ignore: No modified recipes or older target branch,
> > skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_cve_check_ignore)
> > SKIP: test CVE tag format: No new CVE patches introduced
> > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format)
> > SKIP: test Signed-off-by presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> > SKIP: test Upstream-Status presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_upstream_status_presence_format)
> > SKIP: test bugzilla entry format: No bug ID found
> > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_bugzilla_entry_format)
> > SKIP: test lic files chksum modified not mentioned: No modified recipes,
> > skipping test
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned)
> > SKIP: test lic files chksum presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_presence)
> > SKIP: test license presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_license_presence)
> > SKIP: test series merge on head: Merge test is disabled for now
> > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_series_merge_on_head)
> > SKIP: test src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_src_uri_left_files)
> > SKIP: test summary presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_summary_presence)
> > SKIP: test target mailing list: Series merged, no reason to check other
> > mailing lists (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_target_mailing_list)
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Please address the issues identified and
> > submit a new revision of the patch, or alternatively, reply to this
> > email with an explanation of why the patch should be accepted. If you
> > believe these results are due to an error in patchtest, please submit a
> > bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ (use the 'Patchtest' category
> > under 'Yocto Project Subprojects'). For more information on specific
> > failures, see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Patchtest. Thank
> > you!
> >
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#202408): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/202408
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107503127/3617179
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
2024-07-23 23:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
@ 2024-07-24 4:31 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-24 9:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marta Rybczynska @ 2024-07-24 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Belloni; +Cc: patchtest, openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4843 bytes --]
Ah.. it requires my SoB when the patch is from someone else? That could
explain the situation.
Still, it reported an error to patch 1/5 while the issue is in 2/5. Will
check what we can improve in the tool...
Kind regards,
Marta
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:28 AM Alexandre Belloni <
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> On 23/07/2024 17:41:40+0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> > This seems to be a false positive. Possibly the path 2/5 has an issue.
> I'm
> > looking into the source code of patchtest to verify.
>
> It is not, 2/5 is missing your SoB
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marta
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM <patchtest@automation.yoctoproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one
> > > or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for
> > > more information:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Testing patch
> > >
> /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/v2-1-5-cve-check-annotate-CVEs-during-analysis.patch
> > >
> > > FAIL: test Signed-off-by presence: Mbox is missing Signed-off-by. Add
> it
> > > manually or with "git commit --amend -s"
> > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> > >
> > > PASS: pretest pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.pretest_pylint)
> > > PASS: test author valid (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_author_valid)
> > > PASS: test commit message presence
> > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_commit_message_presence)
> > > PASS: test max line length
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_max_line_length)
> > > PASS: test mbox format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_mbox_format)
> > > PASS: test non-AUH upgrade (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_non_auh_upgrade)
> > > PASS: test pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.test_pylint)
> > > PASS: test shortlog format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_format)
> > > PASS: test shortlog length (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_length)
> > >
> > > SKIP: pretest src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.pretest_src_uri_left_files)
> > > SKIP: test CVE check ignore: No modified recipes or older target
> branch,
> > > skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_cve_check_ignore)
> > > SKIP: test CVE tag format: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format)
> > > SKIP: test Signed-off-by presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> > > SKIP: test Upstream-Status presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_upstream_status_presence_format)
> > > SKIP: test bugzilla entry format: No bug ID found
> > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_bugzilla_entry_format)
> > > SKIP: test lic files chksum modified not mentioned: No modified
> recipes,
> > > skipping test
> > >
> (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned)
> > > SKIP: test lic files chksum presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_presence)
> > > SKIP: test license presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_license_presence)
> > > SKIP: test series merge on head: Merge test is disabled for now
> > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_series_merge_on_head)
> > > SKIP: test src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_src_uri_left_files)
> > > SKIP: test summary presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_summary_presence)
> > > SKIP: test target mailing list: Series merged, no reason to check other
> > > mailing lists (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_target_mailing_list)
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Please address the issues identified and
> > > submit a new revision of the patch, or alternatively, reply to this
> > > email with an explanation of why the patch should be accepted. If you
> > > believe these results are due to an error in patchtest, please submit a
> > > bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ (use the 'Patchtest'
> category
> > > under 'Yocto Project Subprojects'). For more information on specific
> > > failures, see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Patchtest. Thank
> > > you!
> > >
>
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > View/Reply Online (#202408):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/202408
> > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107503127/3617179
> > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6613 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis
2024-07-24 4:31 ` Marta Rybczynska
@ 2024-07-24 9:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2024-07-24 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marta Rybczynska; +Cc: patchtest, openembedded-core
On 24/07/2024 06:31:47+0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> Ah.. it requires my SoB when the patch is from someone else? That could
> explain the situation.
Patches you submit on behalf of someone else need you SoB , see (c) of
the DCO:
https://developercertificate.org/
>
> Still, it reported an error to patch 1/5 while the issue is in 2/5. Will
> check what we can improve in the tool...
>
> Kind regards,
> Marta
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:28 AM Alexandre Belloni <
> alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> > On 23/07/2024 17:41:40+0200, Marta Rybczynska wrote:
> > > This seems to be a false positive. Possibly the path 2/5 has an issue.
> > I'm
> > > looking into the source code of patchtest to verify.
> >
> > It is not, 2/5 is missing your SoB
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Marta
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:12 PM <patchtest@automation.yoctoproject.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for your submission. Patchtest identified one
> > > > or more issues with the patch. Please see the log below for
> > > > more information:
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Testing patch
> > > >
> > /home/patchtest/share/mboxes/v2-1-5-cve-check-annotate-CVEs-during-analysis.patch
> > > >
> > > > FAIL: test Signed-off-by presence: Mbox is missing Signed-off-by. Add
> > it
> > > > manually or with "git commit --amend -s"
> > > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> > > >
> > > > PASS: pretest pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.pretest_pylint)
> > > > PASS: test author valid (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_author_valid)
> > > > PASS: test commit message presence
> > > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_commit_message_presence)
> > > > PASS: test max line length
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_max_line_length)
> > > > PASS: test mbox format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_mbox_format)
> > > > PASS: test non-AUH upgrade (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_non_auh_upgrade)
> > > > PASS: test pylint (test_python_pylint.PyLint.test_pylint)
> > > > PASS: test shortlog format (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_format)
> > > > PASS: test shortlog length (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_shortlog_length)
> > > >
> > > > SKIP: pretest src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.pretest_src_uri_left_files)
> > > > SKIP: test CVE check ignore: No modified recipes or older target
> > branch,
> > > > skipping test (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_cve_check_ignore)
> > > > SKIP: test CVE tag format: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_cve_tag_format)
> > > > SKIP: test Signed-off-by presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_signed_off_by_presence)
> > > > SKIP: test Upstream-Status presence: No new CVE patches introduced
> > > > (test_patch.TestPatch.test_upstream_status_presence_format)
> > > > SKIP: test bugzilla entry format: No bug ID found
> > > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_bugzilla_entry_format)
> > > > SKIP: test lic files chksum modified not mentioned: No modified
> > recipes,
> > > > skipping test
> > > >
> > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_modified_not_mentioned)
> > > > SKIP: test lic files chksum presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_lic_files_chksum_presence)
> > > > SKIP: test license presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_license_presence)
> > > > SKIP: test series merge on head: Merge test is disabled for now
> > > > (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_series_merge_on_head)
> > > > SKIP: test src uri left files: No modified recipes, skipping pretest
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_src_uri_left_files)
> > > > SKIP: test summary presence: No added recipes, skipping test
> > > > (test_metadata.TestMetadata.test_summary_presence)
> > > > SKIP: test target mailing list: Series merged, no reason to check other
> > > > mailing lists (test_mbox.TestMbox.test_target_mailing_list)
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Please address the issues identified and
> > > > submit a new revision of the patch, or alternatively, reply to this
> > > > email with an explanation of why the patch should be accepted. If you
> > > > believe these results are due to an error in patchtest, please submit a
> > > > bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ (use the 'Patchtest'
> > category
> > > > under 'Yocto Project Subprojects'). For more information on specific
> > > > failures, see: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Patchtest. Thank
> > > > you!
> > > >
> >
> > >
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> > > View/Reply Online (#202408):
> > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/202408
> > > Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107503127/3617179
> > > Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> > alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com]
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> > https://bootlin.com
> >
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-24 16:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-23 11:53 [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/5] cve_check: Update selftest with new status detail Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 3/5] vex.bbclass: add a new class Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-24 4:57 ` Jörg Sommer
2024-07-24 16:11 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 4/5] cve-check-map: add new statuses Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 11:53 ` [OE-core][PATCH v2 5/5] cve-extra-exclusions.inc: add deprecation notice Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Patchtest results for [OE-core][PATCH v2 1/5] cve-check: annotate CVEs during analysis patchtest
2024-07-23 15:41 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-23 23:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-07-24 4:31 ` Marta Rybczynska
2024-07-24 9:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox