* [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time
@ 2024-07-29 14:44 Li Wang
2024-07-29 18:50 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2024-07-29 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: li.wang
when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
date -s "xxx"
xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
---
.../xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
.../xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2144c3cba2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
+use monotonic time
+
+when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
+the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
+if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
+
+date -s "xxx"
+xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
+
+the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
+---
+ src/access.c | 6 +++---
+ src/builtins.c | 4 ++--
+ src/internals.c | 2 +-
+ src/log.c | 2 +-
+ src/sensor.c | 6 +++---
+ src/server.c | 2 +-
+ src/service.c | 4 ++--
+ src/signals.c | 2 +-
+ src/time.c | 2 +-
+ src/xlog/filelog.c | 2 +-
+ src/xtimer.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
+ src/xtimer.h | 1 +
+ 12 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/src/access.c
++++ b/src/access.c
+@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static void cps_service_restart(void)
+ time_t nowtime;
+ const char *func = "cps_service_restart";
+
+- nowtime = time(NULL);
++ nowtime = _time(NULL);
+ for( i=0; i < pset_count( SERVICES(ps) ); i++ ) {
+ struct service *sp;
+ struct service_config *scp;
+@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void cps_service_stop(struct service *sp
+ msg(LOG_ERR, "service_stop",
+ "Deactivating service %s due to %s. Restarting in %d seconds.",
+ SC_NAME(scp), reason, (int)SC_TIME_WAIT(scp));
+- nowtime = time(NULL);
++ nowtime = _time(NULL);
+ SC_TIME_REENABLE(scp) = nowtime + SC_TIME_WAIT(scp);
+ xtimer_add(cps_service_restart, SC_TIME_WAIT(scp));
+ }
+@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ access_e parent_access_control( struct s
+ /* CPS handler */
+ if( SC_TIME_CONN_MAX(scp) != 0 ) {
+ int time_diff;
+- nowtime = time(NULL);
++ nowtime = _time(NULL);
+ time_diff = nowtime - SC_TIME_LIMIT(scp) ;
+
+ if( SC_TIME_CONN(scp) == 0 ) {
+--- a/src/builtins.c
++++ b/src/builtins.c
+@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static void daytime_protocol( char *buf,
+ int size = *buflen ;
+ int cc ;
+
+- (void) time( &now ) ;
++ (void) _time( &now ) ;
+ tmp = localtime( &now ) ;
+ cc = strx_nprint( buf, size,
+ "%02d %s %d %02d:%02d:%02d",
+@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void time_protocol( unsigned char
+ time_t now ;
+ unsigned long base1900;
+
+- (void) time( &now ) ;
++ (void) _time( &now ) ;
+ base1900 = (unsigned long)now + TIME_OFFSET ;
+ timep[0] = base1900 >> 24;
+ timep[1] = base1900 >> 16;
+--- a/src/internals.c
++++ b/src/internals.c
+@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void dump_internal_state(void)
+ * Print the program name, version, and timestamp.
+ * Note that the program_version variable contains the program name.
+ */
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ Sprint( dump_fd, "INTERNAL STATE DUMP: %s\n", program_version ) ;
+ Sprint( dump_fd, "Current time: %s\n", ctime( ¤t_time ) ) ;
+
+--- a/src/log.c
++++ b/src/log.c
+@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void svc_log_exit( struct service *sp, c
+ {
+ time_t current_time ;
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ cc = strx_nprint( &buf[ len ], bufsize, " duration=%ld(sec)",
+ (long)(current_time - SERVER_STARTTIME( serp )) ) ;
+ len += cc ;
+--- a/src/sensor.c
++++ b/src/sensor.c
+@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void process_sensor( const struct servic
+ time_t nowtime;
+ char time_buf[40], *tmp;
+
+- nowtime = time(NULL);
++ nowtime = _time(NULL);
+ msg(LOG_CRIT, func,
+ "Adding %s to the global_no_access list for %d minutes",
+ dup_addr, SC_DENY_TIME(SVC_CONF(sp)));
+@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ void process_sensor( const struct servic
+ {
+ time_t nowtime, new_time;
+
+- nowtime = time(NULL);
++ nowtime = _time(NULL);
+ new_time = (time_t)nowtime+(60*SC_DENY_TIME(SVC_CONF(sp))); if (difftime(new_time, (time_t)stored_time) > 0.0)
+ { /* new_time is longer save it */
+ char time_buf[40], *new_exp_time;
+@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void scrub_global_access_list( vo
+ {
+ int found_one = 0;
+ unsigned u;
+- time_t nowtime = time(NULL);
++ time_t nowtime = _time(NULL);
+
+ for (u=0; u < count; u++)
+ {
+--- a/src/server.c
++++ b/src/server.c
+@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ status_e server_start( struct server *se
+ return( FAILED ) ;
+
+ default:
+- (void) time( &SERVER_STARTTIME(serp) ) ;
++ (void) _time( &SERVER_STARTTIME(serp) ) ;
+ SVC_INC_RUNNING_SERVERS( sp ) ;
+
+ /*
+--- a/src/service.c
++++ b/src/service.c
+@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static status_e failed_service(struct se
+ SVC_LAST_DGRAM_ADDR(sp) = (union xsockaddr *)last;
+ }
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ if ( sinp->sin_addr.s_addr == last->sin_addr.s_addr &&
+ sinp->sin_port == last->sin_port )
+ {
+@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static status_e failed_service(struct se
+ SVC_LAST_DGRAM_ADDR( sp ) = (union xsockaddr *)last;
+ }
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ if ( IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL(&(sinp->sin6_addr), &(last->sin6_addr)) &&
+ sinp->sin6_port == last->sin6_port )
+ {
+--- a/src/signals.c
++++ b/src/signals.c
+@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static void bad_signal(void)
+ else if ( total_signal_count > MAX_SIGNAL_COUNT )
+ _exit( 1 ) ; /* in case of a problem in exit(3) */
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+
+ if ( interval_signal_count > 0 &&
+ current_time - interval_start <= SIGNAL_INTERVAL )
+--- a/src/time.c
++++ b/src/time.c
+@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ bool_int ti_current_time_check( const ps
+ int16_t min_current ;
+ struct tm *tmp ;
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ tmp = localtime( ¤t_time ) ;
+ min_current = tmp->tm_hour * 60 + tmp->tm_min ;
+
+--- a/src/xlog/filelog.c
++++ b/src/xlog/filelog.c
+@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int filelog_write( xlog_s *xp, co
+ if ( flp->fl_state != FL_OPEN )
+ return( flp->fl_error ) ;
+
+- (void) time( ¤t_time ) ;
++ (void) _time( ¤t_time ) ;
+ tmp = localtime( ¤t_time ) ;
+ cc = Sprint( flp->fl_fd, "%02d/%d/%d@%02d:%02d:%02d",
+ tmp->tm_year%100, tmp->tm_mon+1, tmp->tm_mday,
+--- a/src/xtimer.c
++++ b/src/xtimer.c
+@@ -11,6 +11,15 @@
+ #include "pset.h"
+ #include "msg.h"
+
++time_t _time(time_t *t)
++{
++ struct timespec ts;
++ clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
++ if(t)
++ *t = ts.tv_sec;
++ return ts.tv_sec;
++}
++
+ /* A note on the usage of timers in these functions:
+ * The timers are composed of 3 elements, a pointer to a callback function,
+ * the expire time of the timer, and a unique (pseudo-monotomically increasing)
+@@ -68,7 +77,7 @@ int xtimer_add( void (*func)(void), time
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+- tmptime = time(NULL);
++ tmptime = _time(NULL);
+ if( tmptime == -1 ) {
+ free( new_xtimer );
+ return -1;
+@@ -107,7 +116,7 @@ int xtimer_poll(void)
+
+ for( i = 0; i < pset_count( xtimer_list ); i++ ) {
+ xtime_h *cur_timer = pset_pointer( xtimer_list, i );
+- time_t cur_time = time(NULL);
++ time_t cur_time = _time(NULL);
+
+ /* The list is sorted, low to high. If there's no
+ * timers left, return.
+@@ -163,7 +172,7 @@ time_t xtimer_nexttime(void)
+ if( pset_count(xtimer_list) == 0 )
+ return -1;
+
+- ret = ((xtime_h *)pset_pointer(xtimer_list, 0))->when - time(NULL) ;
++ ret = ((xtime_h *)pset_pointer(xtimer_list, 0))->when - _time(NULL) ;
+ if( ret < 0 )
+ ret = 0;
+ return( ret );
+--- a/src/xtimer.h
++++ b/src/xtimer.h
+@@ -22,4 +22,5 @@ int xtimer_poll(void);
+ int xtimer_remove(int);
+ time_t xtimer_nexttime(void);
+
++time_t _time(time_t *t);
+ #endif /* _X_TIMER_H */
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb
index c6d356d227..94fc28ff6e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SRC_URI = "git://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd.git;protocol=https;branch=master \
file://xinetd.init \
file://xinetd.default \
file://xinetd.service \
+ file://use-monotonic-time.patch \
"
SRCREV = "6a4af7786630ce48747d9687e2f18f45ea6684c4"
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time
2024-07-29 14:44 [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time Li Wang
@ 2024-07-29 18:50 ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-30 2:06 ` Wang, Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2024-07-29 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: li.wang; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 16:48, Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org
<li.wang=windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
> the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
> if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
>
> date -s "xxx"
> xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
>
> the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
> ---
> .../xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..2144c3cba2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
> +use monotonic time
> +
> +when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
> +the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
> +if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
> +
> +date -s "xxx"
> +xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
> +
> +the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
Is this patch taken from here?
https://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd/pull/45
If so, it has an incorrect upstream-status. Please fix that.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time
2024-07-29 18:50 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
@ 2024-07-30 2:06 ` Wang, Li
2024-07-30 2:46 ` Khem Raj
2024-07-30 10:27 ` Alexander Kanavin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Li @ 2024-07-30 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Kanavin; +Cc: openembedded-core
On 7/30/2024 02:50, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 16:48, Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org
> <li.wang=windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>> when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
>> the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
>> if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
>>
>> date -s "xxx"
>> xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
>>
>> the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> .../xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
>> .../xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..2144c3cba2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
>> +use monotonic time
>> +
>> +when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
>> +the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
>> +if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
>> +
>> +date -s "xxx"
>> +xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
>> +
>> +the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by system time.
>> +
>> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> Is this patch taken from here?
> https://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd/pull/45
>
> If so, it has an incorrect upstream-status. Please fix that.
yes, but the upstream does not merge the patch, yet.
in this situation, what should I fill the status?
Thanks,
LiWang.
>
> Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time
2024-07-30 2:06 ` Wang, Li
@ 2024-07-30 2:46 ` Khem Raj
2024-07-30 10:27 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2024-07-30 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: li.wang; +Cc: Alexander Kanavin, openembedded-core
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2792 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 7:06 PM Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org <li.wang=
windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/30/2024 02:50, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 16:48, Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org
> > <li.wang=windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> >> when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
> >> the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated,
> >> if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
> >>
> >> date -s "xxx"
> >> xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming
> connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
> >>
> >> the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by
> system time.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch | 246 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> >>
> >> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000..2144c3cba2
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
> >> +use monotonic time
> >> +
> >> +when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back,
> >> +the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets
> deactivated,
> >> +if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated.
> >> +
> >> +date -s "xxx"
> >> +xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming
> connections. Restarting in 10 seconds.
> >> +
> >> +the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected
> by system time.
> >> +
> >> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> > Is this patch taken from here?
> > https://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd/pull/45
> >
> > If so, it has an incorrect upstream-status. Please fix that.
>
> yes, but the upstream does not merge the patch, yet.
>
> in this situation, what should I fill the status?
>
It’s should say Submitted [link to pr]
> Thanks,
> LiWang.
>
> >
> > Alex
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#202665):
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/202665
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107610065/1997914
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [
> raj.khem@gmail.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4504 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time
2024-07-30 2:06 ` Wang, Li
2024-07-30 2:46 ` Khem Raj
@ 2024-07-30 10:27 ` Alexander Kanavin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Kanavin @ 2024-07-30 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang, Li; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 04:06, Wang, Li <li.wang@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> > Is this patch taken from here?
> > https://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd/pull/45
> >
> > If so, it has an incorrect upstream-status. Please fix that.
>
> yes, but the upstream does not merge the patch, yet.
>
> in this situation, what should I fill the status?
Submitted [link]
You can check the definitions and expectations for upstream-status here:
https://docs.yoctoproject.org/contributor-guide/recipe-style-guide.html#patch-upstream-status
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-30 10:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-29 14:44 [openembedded-core V2][master][PATCH]xinetd: use monotonic time Li Wang
2024-07-29 18:50 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2024-07-30 2:06 ` Wang, Li
2024-07-30 2:46 ` Khem Raj
2024-07-30 10:27 ` Alexander Kanavin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox