From: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
To: Yash Shinde <Yash.Shinde@windriver.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Naveen.Gowda@windriver.com, Sundeep.Kokkonda@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cargo: Increase RUST_MIN_STACK size to avoid SIGSEGV in DEBUG builds only.
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:02:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35d5f2ec-4281-4be1-8040-829dbbdc0d58@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a5cd559-7db3-461d-bef6-10e4545e1b8a@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3699 bytes --]
On 2024-10-31 5:35 a.m., Yash Shinde wrote:
>
> On 30-10-2024 19:54, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>> On 2024-10-30 7:16 a.m., Yash.Shinde@windriver.com wrote:
>>> From: Yash Shinde<Yash.Shinde@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> For some Rust crates, like building p384 in DEBUG mode, a SIGSEGV
>>> is encountered as follows:
>>>
>>> note: rustc unexpectedly overflowed its stack! this is a bug
>>> note: maximum backtrace depth reached, frames may have been lost
>>> note: we would appreciate a report
>>> athttps://github.com/rust-lang/rust
>>> note: backtrace dumped due to SIGSEGV! resuming signal
>>> error: could not compile `p384` (lib)
>>>
>>> WARNING: Backtrace (BB generated script):
>>> #1: oe_cargo_build,
>>> /home/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-32-wrs-linux/cargo/1.79.0/temp/run.do_compile.3262358,
>>> line 193
>>> #2: cargo_do_compile,
>>> /home/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-32-wrs-linux/cargo/1.79.0/temp/run.do_compile.3262358,
>>> line 165
>>> #3: do_compile,
>>> /home/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-32-wrs-linux/cargo/1.79.0/temp/run.do_compile.3262358,
>>> line 160
>>> #4: main,
>>> /home/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-32-wrs-linux/cargo/1.79.0/temp/run.do_compile.3262358,
>>> line 206
>>>
>>> Setting RUST_MIN_STACK to 8MB conditionally for DEBUG builds only
>>> handles
>>> the stack overflow and SIGSEGV.
>>
>> s/to 8MB/from 2MB to 8MB/
>>
>> Best to explain what the current default value in your commit log in
>> case the rust devs increase the limit some day.
>>
>> From:
>> rust.git on 🦀 v1.80.0
>> ❯ grep -C 1 DEFAULT_MIN_ST library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/thread.rs
>> #[cfg(not(any(target_os = "l4re", target_os = "vxworks", target_os =
>> "espidf")))]
>> pub const DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE: usize = 2 * 1024 * 1024;
>> #[cfg(target_os = "l4re")]
>> pub const DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE: usize = 1024 * 1024;
>> #[cfg(target_os = "vxworks")]
>> pub const DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE: usize = 256 * 1024;
>> #[cfg(target_os = "espidf")]
>> pub const DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE: usize = 0; // 0 indicates that the
>> stack size configured in the ESP-IDF menuconfig system should be used
>>
>>> References:https://github.com/esp-rs/rust/issues/214
>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122357
>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122847#issue-2201254359
>>> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122847/commits
>> Is there an issue open for the p384 crate to reconsider their stack
>> abuse?
>>
>> If so, please include that link. If not, create one and link that.
>>
>>
>> Thanks Yashe,
>>
>> ../Randy
>>
> The second issue mentioned in the references is still open but there
> aren't any recent updates.
> Also, Sundeep had reported the same issue in rust and llvm before:
>
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113612 (closed as not planned)
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76920 (open, but again
> points to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122357)
>
> Let me know, if you want me to send a v2?
We discussed this issue and agreed that since it doesn't affect YP AB
since there are no DEBUG builds done there
and more importantly since it's really a work-around rather than a fix,
we'll continue to work with upstream p384
crate owners to resolve the issue. Forcing users to change the stack
size, even for debug builds, is not a good policy
and hopefully some of the code-generation tools that are inputs to p384
can be adjusted to reduce stack usage.
../Randy
>
> Regards,
> Yash
>
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6976 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-30 11:16 [PATCH] cargo: Increase RUST_MIN_STACK size to avoid SIGSEGV in DEBUG builds only Yash.Shinde
2024-10-30 11:20 ` Yash Shinde
2024-10-30 14:24 ` Randy MacLeod
2024-10-31 9:35 ` Yash Shinde
2024-10-31 14:02 ` Randy MacLeod [this message]
2024-11-14 11:02 ` Yash Shinde
2024-11-14 12:01 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35d5f2ec-4281-4be1-8040-829dbbdc0d58@windriver.com \
--to=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=Naveen.Gowda@windriver.com \
--cc=Sundeep.Kokkonda@windriver.com \
--cc=Yash.Shinde@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox