Re: OE-Classic recipe migration status

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Sunday 11 November 2012 21:16:13 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 07:58:09PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 November 2012 20:52:26 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > I've noticed quite a few recipes listed here, which does exist in some
> > > layer (recipes mostly from meta-fso, meta-aurora, meta-shr), should I
> > > remove them from that wiki page or add layer name in 2nd column?
> > 
> > I did have all the layers in meta-smartphone included in the list I used
> > to
> > filter this one, so if there are items that somehow didn't get removed I'd
> > like to figure out why. Can you list them here so I can look into that?
>
> Ah sorry, you're probably right
> 
> I've noticed e.g this:
> libfsobasics	[distro]
> libfsoresource	[distro]
> libfsosystem	[distro]
> libfsotransport	[distro]
> but those are now provided by single libfsoframework recipe and I've
> forgot this change
> https://github.com/shr-distribution/meta-smartphone/commit/0298befc97dc5dca2
> a3721fb0ff9d4caf8d24f84
> 
> So I'll just update [distro] flag to something like obsoleted by
> libfsoframework.

Ah ok, sounds good.

> The rest is probably also not 1:1 like qfsodbusxml2cpp-native
> ./meta-fso/recipes-freesmartphone/freesmartphone/qfsodbusxml2cpp_git.bb
> 
> Maybe you can try to update scripts to show matches after "-native"
> suffix strip?

I'd prefer to handle this manually - there are cases when newer recipes 
haven't been BBCLASSEXTENDed to handle -native so I've been checking this by 
hand.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre