Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix recipe multilib header conflicts

[Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>]

On 7/25/11 9:08 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
>>
>> Fix the issue where the generated header differs based on the bitsize of the
>> target at the time of building.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>  meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc        |    4 +++-
>>  .../linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb                |    5 ++++-
>>  .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.37.2.bb                 |    5 ++++-
>>  .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.39.bb                   |    5 +++++
>>  meta/recipes-support/apr/apr_1.4.2.bb              |    8 ++++++--
>>  meta/recipes-support/beecrypt/beecrypt_4.2.1.bb    |    8 ++++++--
>>  6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> The changes in linux-libc-header and linux-libc-headers-yocto don't seem
> to be related to the description above. 

Yes, description is misleading.  The changes to the linux-libc-headers removed a
set of files that had different contents when built for different bitsize.

> Also, the binutils.inc change seems to be missing a PR bump.
> 
> The changes in apr and beecrypt look like they are probably fine, though
> it would be nice for the subject line to mention the names of the
> recipes being changed.

This can be split or kept as a unit.  I kept it as a single unit to show that
these changes are all related.  They don't change the contents of anything --
but resolve conflicts in header files.

--Mark

> p.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core