Re: [PATCH] scripts/oe-buildenv-internal: Add SOCKS5_{USER, PASSWD} to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE

[Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>]

On 08/03/2011 07:56 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 14:41 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 08/03/2011 10:00 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If a SOCKS5 gateway is needed for a proxy access like git it might also
>>>>>> require authentication to the proxy via a password and username.  Adding
>>>>>> SOCKS5_USER&   SOCKS5_PASSWD to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE allow for automation
>>>>>> of the authentication request to occur when something like a git fetch
>>>>>> is going through the proxy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala<galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> * Fixes issue with a git fetch request failing to get pass a firewall
>>>>>>
>>>>>> scripts/oe-buildenv-internal |    2 +-
>>>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal b/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal
>>>>>> index c13fc40..b223292 100755
>>>>>> --- a/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal
>>>>>> +++ b/scripts/oe-buildenv-internal
>>>>>> @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ unset BITBAKEDIR
>>>>>> export BUILDDIR
>>>>>> export PATH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -export BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE="MACHINE DISTRO TCMODE TCLIBC http_proxy ftp_proxy https_proxy all_proxy ALL_PROXY no_proxy SSH_AGENT_PID SSH_AUTH_SOCK BB_SRCREV_POLICY SDKMACHINE BB_NUMBER_THREADS PARALLEL_MAKE GIT_PROXY_COMMAND"
>>>>>> +export BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE="MACHINE DISTRO TCMODE TCLIBC http_proxy ftp_proxy https_proxy all_proxy ALL_PROXY no_proxy SSH_AGENT_PID SSH_AUTH_SOCK BB_SRCREV_POLICY SDKMACHINE BB_NUMBER_THREADS PARALLEL_MAKE GIT_PROXY_COMMAND SOCKS5_PASSWD SOCSK5_USER"
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.7.3.4
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping on this patch
>>>>>
>>>> Kumar,
>>>>
>>>> I think you were asked to modify this patch so that the additinal
>>> SOCKS5_* do not get into sstate, Paul Eggleton provided the
>>> BB_HASHSPACE_WHITELIST info.
>>>>
>>>> Please update this patch
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 	Sau!
>>>
>>>  From the thread it sounded as if that was NOT needed.  As nothing
>>> refers to SOCKS5_* we didn't need to add it.  Much like how it doesn't
>>> have SSH_AGENT_PID or SSH_AUTH_SOCK in it.
>>
>> It would be good is someone could confirm it but its in the environment
>> so it likely is needed.
>
> Not sure I follow.  Confirm what?
>
Kumar,

I think Richard wants you to confirm that the SSH_* and SOCKS5_* 
information is not stored in the shared state hash.

Sau!

> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>