* Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages?
@ 2011-09-20 19:03 Daniel Lazzari
2011-09-20 19:08 ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-20 19:42 ` Chris Larson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lazzari @ 2011-09-20 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org'
I noticed a problem with the alsa-utils package where the alsa-utils package does not depend on all of the little extra packages it's supposed to pull in. I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is though. Can anyone give me a little guidance or point me at a recipe that does this correctly already?
Thanks,
Dan Lazzari Jr.
Firmware Engineer
dlazzari@leapfrog.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages?
2011-09-20 19:03 Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages? Daniel Lazzari
@ 2011-09-20 19:08 ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-20 19:42 ` Chris Larson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hatle @ 2011-09-20 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 9/20/11 2:03 PM, Daniel Lazzari wrote:
> I noticed a problem with the alsa-utils package where the alsa-utils package does not depend on all of the little extra packages it's supposed to pull in. I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is though. Can anyone give me a little guidance or point me at a recipe that does this correctly already?
If you are using the RPM backend, I'm currently working on something that may
resolve this issue for you. Hopefully ready today.
Otherwise, switch to ipk or deb and see if you get the same behavior.
--Mark
> Thanks,
>
> Dan Lazzari Jr.
> Firmware Engineer
> dlazzari@leapfrog.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages?
2011-09-20 19:03 Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages? Daniel Lazzari
2011-09-20 19:08 ` Mark Hatle
@ 2011-09-20 19:42 ` Chris Larson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Larson @ 2011-09-20 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Daniel Lazzari <dlazzari@leapfrog.com> wrote:
> I noticed a problem with the alsa-utils package where the alsa-utils package does not depend on all of the little extra packages it's supposed to pull in. I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is though. Can anyone give me a little guidance or point me at a recipe that does this correctly already?
I don't see why this is a problem, personally. If someone wants a
recipe's main package to depend on the other packages it emits,
they're free to make the recipe do so. But the ${PN} package is not
defined to include everything from the recipe, it never has been.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-20 19:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-20 19:03 Correct way of having the PN package depend on the other packages? Daniel Lazzari
2011-09-20 19:08 ` Mark Hatle
2011-09-20 19:42 ` Chris Larson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox