From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/26] xinit: Update to 1.3.1
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:01:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE25B1E.1060603@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE25863.20906@windriver.com>
On 09/12/11 10:50, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 12/9/11 12:42 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Dear Saul,
>>
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 29.11.2011, 15:00 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold:
>>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold<sgw@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../xorg-app/{xinit_1.3.0.bb => xinit_1.3.1.bb} | 6 +++---
>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xinit_1.3.0.bb =>
>>> xinit_1.3.1.bb} (80%)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb
>>> b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb
>>> similarity index 80%
>>> rename from meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb
>>> rename to meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb
>>> index 08dfe12..2ddebe6 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.0.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xinit_1.3.1.bb
>>> @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>>> "file://COPYING;md5=0d4b5eef75f1584ccbdc5e4a34314407"
>>> PR = "r2"
>>
>> when upgrading recipes please remember to reset `PR` to 0. I just
>> spotted that now when looking through the “recent” changes [1].
>
> I have not been doing that. When I asked a while back the response I
> got was mixed and what I took from it is that PR (on a package upgrade)
> is up to the discretion of the person performing the upgrade.
>
> If reseting to 0 is/should be the official policy, then we really need
> to document it as part of the patch/update guidelines..
My understanding is that the differing of opinion is between:
a) setting the PR = "0" in the recipe
b) deleting the PR entry from the recipe
Both of which set PR to 0, which I always understood to be 'policy'
unless there's a reason not to (usually meta-oe compatibility) but each
have their proponents for what makes most sense.
Regards,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 23:00 [PATCH 00/26] Various Package Updates Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 01/26] wget: Update to 1.13.4 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 02/26] json-glib: Update to 0.14.2 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 03/26] libdrm: Update to 2.4.27 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 04/26] mkfontscale: Update to 1.0.9 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 05/26] xdpyinfo: Update to 1.3.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 06/26] xinit: Update to 1.3.1 Saul Wold
2011-12-09 18:42 ` Paul Menzel
2011-12-09 18:50 ` Mark Hatle
2011-12-09 19:01 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2011-12-09 19:46 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 07/26] xkbcomp: Update to 1.2.3 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 08/26] xprop: Update to 1.2.1 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 09/26] xrandr: Update to 1.3.5 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 10/26] xset: Update to 1.2.2 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 11/26] xwininfo: Update to 1.1.2 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 12/26] xf86-input-mouse: Update to 1.7.1 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 13/26] xf86-input-synaptics: Update to 1.5.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 14/26] xf86-video-intel: Update to 2.17.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 15/26] xserver-xorg*: Update to 1.11.2 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:07 ` Martin Jansa
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 16/26] lame: Update to 3.99.3 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 17/26] gdbm: Update to 1.10 Saul Wold
2011-11-30 19:00 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 18/26] libtasn1: Update to 2.11 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 19/26] gnutls: Update to 2.12.14 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 20/26] libiconv: Update to 1.14 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:08 ` Martin Jansa
2011-11-30 0:07 ` Saul Wold
2011-11-30 0:19 ` Joshua Lock
2011-11-30 7:29 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 21/26] coreutils: build and install hostname Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 22/26] ocf-linux: Add ocf-linux to support openssl 1.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 23/26] openssl-0.9.8: move parallel-make fix to 0.9.8 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 24/26] openssl: Add openssl 1.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 25/26] PR Bump for OpenSSL 1.0 Saul Wold
2011-11-29 23:00 ` [PATCH 26/26] Distro Tracking: Update Ownership and Update Dates Saul Wold
2011-11-30 15:06 ` [PATCH 00/26] Various Package Updates Richard Purdie
2011-11-30 15:09 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-30 23:12 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EE25B1E.1060603@linux.intel.com \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox