From: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] archive.bbclass: archive work directory
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:20:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0A4EE5.7040906@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F06B4E5.7090901@linux.intel.com>
On 01/06/2012 04:46 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 12:20 AM, wenzong.fan@windriver.com wrote:
>> From: Wenzong Fan<wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
>>
>> Some legal departments believe a complete archive of the work directory
>> is required for certain license compliance issues. We could therefore
>> do with a class which archives up the work directories in each build and
>> provide them so those legal departments can be happy.
>>
>> Implementations:
>>
>> Add a new class named 'archive.bbclass' to provide task 'do_archive',
>> and get it called after 'do_patch' before 'do_configure'.
>>
>> Following cases should be considered to the sources dirs:
>> 1) The sources dir is under $WORKDIR:
>> Just archive sources and temp/run.* up.
>>
>> 2) The sources dir is outside of $WORKDIR, the only package is gcc:
>> Copy its sources and temp/run.* to a temporary dir and then archive
>> them up.
>>
>> 3) The sources dir is equal to $WORKDIR:
>> Just archive whole work dir up.
>>
>> [YOCTO #1590]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan<wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/archive.bbclass | 42
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 meta/classes/archive.bbclass
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/archive.bbclass b/meta/classes/archive.bbclass
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..75ac090
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/classes/archive.bbclass
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +# Archive the patched sources and build scripts to assist in license
>> +# compliance by the end user or legal departments.
>> +
>> +ARCHIVE_DIR = "${TMPDIR}/archives/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/"
>> +do_archive[dirs] = "${ARCHIVE_DIR}"
>> +
> I see you set ARCHIVE_DIR, but I don' see you move or copy any files
> to this directory, am I missing something?
It just gets bitbake creating '${ARCHIVE_DIR}' before the task started,
and then 'do_archive' will be run in this dir.
>
>> +archive_do_archive() {
>> + # In mostly scenarios the $S is under $WORKDIR and has a separate
>> + # dir for storing the sources; but gcc is a special case, its
>> sources
>> + # had been moved to the shared location 'tmp/work-shared/'
>> + if [[ -d ${S}&& ${S} != ${WORKDIR} ]]; then
>> + if [[ ${S} =~ "/work-shared/gcc" ]]; then
>> + # Create temporary sources directory for gcc
>> + mkdir -p ${PF}/temp
>> + cp -r ${S} ${PF}
>> + cp -r ${S}/../temp/* ${PF}/temp
>> + cp -r ${WORKDIR}/temp/* ${PF}/temp
>> + tarbase=`pwd`
>> + else
>> + tarbase=`dirname ${WORKDIR}`
>> + fi
>> +
>> + sourcedir=`basename ${S}`
>> + tar -C $tarbase -cjf ${PF}.tar.bz2 ${PF}/$sourcedir \
>> + ${PF}/temp --exclude log.do_*
>> +
> Also, do you want to name the tarball PF or BP, which deals with
> removing any multilib naming issues if the build it multilib.
>
> Note BP = ${BPN}-${PV} so it removes the ${PR} if that is important
> (which it might be).
Sorry I'm not clear your exact meanings here, do you mean the tarball
name with '${PF}' will have any issues?
Thanks
Wenzong
>
>> + # Remove the temporary gcc sources directory
>> + if [[ ${S} =~ "/work-shared/gcc"&& -d ${PF} ]]; then
>> + rm -rf ${PF}
>> + fi
>> + fi
>> +
>> + # Just archive whole build directory up when $S is equal to
>> $WORKDIR
>> + if [[ -d ${S}&& ${S} == ${WORKDIR} ]]; then
>> + tarbase=`dirname ${WORKDIR}`
>> + tar -C $tarbase -cjf ${PF}.tar.bz2 ${PF} --exclude log.do_*
>> + fi
>> +}
>> +
>> +addtask do_archive after do_patch before do_configure
>> +
>> +EXPORT_FUNCTIONS do_archive
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 8:20 [PATCH 0/1] archive.bbclass: archive work directory wenzong.fan
2012-01-06 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/1] " wenzong.fan
2012-01-06 8:46 ` Saul Wold
2012-01-09 2:20 ` wenzong fan [this message]
2012-01-06 17:39 ` Phil Blundell
2012-01-09 3:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] archive.bbclass: archive work directoryDistribution wenzong fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0A4EE5.7040906@windriver.com \
--to=wenzong.fan@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox