Re: [PATCH 1/4] lttng-ust: Integrate into yocto linux

[Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@windriver.com>]

于 2012年01月11日 00:58, Darren Hart 写道:
>
> On 01/10/2012 08:11 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>    
>> This patch intended to integrate the LTTng UST 2.0 package, which
>> contains the userspace tracer library to trace userspace codes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-ust_1.9.4.bb |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-ust_1.9.4.bb
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-ust_1.9.4.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-ust_1.9.4.bb
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..846019e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng-2.0/lttng-ust_1.9.4.bb
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +SUMMARY = "Linux Trace Toolkit Userspace Tracer 2.0"
>> +DESCRIPTION = "The LTTng UST 2.0 package contains the userspace tracer library to trace userspace codes."
>> +HOMEPAGE = "http://lttng.org/lttng2.0"
>> +BUGTRACKER = "n/a"
>> +
>> +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+&  BSD"
>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=e647752e045a8c45b6f583771bd561ef \
>> +                    file://snprintf/snprintf.c;endline=32;md5=d3d544959d8a3782b2e07451be0a903c \
>> +                    file://snprintf/various.h;endline=31;md5=89f2509b6b4682c4fc95255eec4abe44"
>> +
>> +inherit autotools
>> +
>> +DEPENDS = "liburcu util-linux"
>> +
>> +SRC_URI = "http://lttng.org/files/lttng-ust/lttng-ust-${PV}.tar.gz"
>> +
>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0f09bb954c99cb99ab6997cd492953c1"
>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "e9ec3c55c2251b3f3b512bfa1015b0f67e35d55793850ccea5134f7b24ee3ba1"
>> +
>> +S = "${WORKDIR}/lttng-ust-${PV}"
>> +
>> +# Due to liburcu not building on MIPS currently this recipe needs to
>> +# be limited also.
>> +# So here let us first suppport x86/arm/powerpc platforms now.
>> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(x86_64.*|i.86.*|arm.*|powerpc.*)-linux'
>>      
> We had discussed using a different comment that more clearly stated why
> this is necessary and use the same comment across all the patches
> implementing this.
>
> This applies to all 4 patches. The suggestion was in my response to
> Patch 1/4 V1:
>    
Oops, sorry Darren, all fixed and really soon for V4 on OE :-)

Regards,
Zumeng
>    
>> Looking through documentation.conf and existing poky sources, I believe
>> this test is correct. HOST/TARGET are the same in this case. The comment
>> is a bit confusing however. I believe the comment should read:
>>
>> # liburcu doesn't build for MIPS
>> COMPATIBLE_HOST = '(x86_64.*|i.86.*|arm.*|powerpc.*)-linux'
>>
>> The key difference being "for" instead of "on". The rest of the comment
>> is redundant with the assignment itself. This applies to all 4 patches.
>>      
> Otherwise, things look good.
>
>