* [RFC PATCH 0/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
@ 2012-02-03 21:37 Chase Maupin
2012-02-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Maupin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chase Maupin @ 2012-02-03 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Chase Maupin
All,
I would like your feedback on this patch which is intended to solve the
following issues with some of the newer versions of u-boot:
1. The u-boot image now ends in .img instead of .bin
2. Some versions and plaforms may use and SPL bootloader which is
built at the same time as the u-boot binary
I tried to make sure this was backwards compatible and I was able to test
this for an am335x-evm machine from the meta-texasinstruments layer.
Most of these changes were ported from the u-boot.inc file that is in the
meta-texasinstruments layer and cleaned up to make them more generic.
Lastly, I noticed that the u-boot.inc file does not have any kind of
INC_PR defined like I would have expected to help make sure that updates
to this file cause a rebuild of u-boot recipes that depend on this
include file. Is this something that should be added?
Thanks,
Chase
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
2012-02-03 21:37 [RFC PATCH 0/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions Chase Maupin
@ 2012-02-03 21:37 ` Chase Maupin
2012-02-03 21:43 ` Maupin, Chase
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chase Maupin @ 2012-02-03 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Chase Maupin
* Add support for different suffixes found with later u-boot
versions which have switched from .bin to .img
* Allow recipes that include u-boot.inc to also package an
SPL if they build one.
* Minimum requirement is to set the SPL_BINARY value to add
the SPL to the u-boot package as well as into the deploy
directory.
Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <Chase.Maupin@ti.com>
---
meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
index 4180345..dcf5463 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
@@ -19,11 +19,22 @@ python () {
raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("because UBOOT_MACHINE is not set")
}
-UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.bin"
-UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.bin"
-UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin"
+# Some versions of u-boot use .bin and others use .img. By default use .bin
+# but enable individual recipes to change this value.
+UBOOT_SUFFIX ?= "bin"
+UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
+UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
+UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET ?= "all"
+# Some versions of u-boot build an SPL (Second Program Loader) image that
+# should be packaged along with the u-boot binary as well as placed in the
+# deploy directory. For those versions they can set the following variables
+# to allow packaging the SPL.
+SPL_BINARY ?= ""
+SPL_IMAGE ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${PV}-${PR}"
+SPL_SYMLINK ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${MACHINE}"
+
do_compile () {
unset LDFLAGS
unset CFLAGS
@@ -36,15 +47,33 @@ do_install () {
install -d ${D}/boot
install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_BINARY}
+
+ if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
+ then
+ install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${SPL_IMAGE}
+ ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${SPL_BINARY}
+ fi
}
FILES_${PN} = "/boot"
+# no gnu_hash in uboot.bin, by design, so skip QA
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
do_deploy () {
- install ${S}/u-boot.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
+ install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}
+ install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
rm -f ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
+
+ if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
+ then
+ install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_IMAGE}
+ rm -f ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
+ ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
+ ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
+ fi
}
+
addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
2012-02-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Maupin
@ 2012-02-03 21:43 ` Maupin, Chase
2012-02-03 22:53 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-03 23:26 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maupin, Chase @ 2012-02-03 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maupin, Chase, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maupin, Chase
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:37 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Maupin, Chase
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot
> versions
>
> * Add support for different suffixes found with later u-boot
> versions which have switched from .bin to .img
> * Allow recipes that include u-boot.inc to also package an
> SPL if they build one.
> * Minimum requirement is to set the SPL_BINARY value to add
> the SPL to the u-boot package as well as into the deploy
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <Chase.Maupin@ti.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 37
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-
> bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> index 4180345..dcf5463 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> @@ -19,11 +19,22 @@ python () {
> raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("because UBOOT_MACHINE is
> not set")
> }
>
> -UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.bin"
> -UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.bin"
> -UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin"
> +# Some versions of u-boot use .bin and others use .img. By
> default use .bin
> +# but enable individual recipes to change this value.
> +UBOOT_SUFFIX ?= "bin"
> +UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> +UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> +UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET ?= "all"
>
> +# Some versions of u-boot build an SPL (Second Program Loader)
> image that
> +# should be packaged along with the u-boot binary as well as
> placed in the
> +# deploy directory. For those versions they can set the following
> variables
> +# to allow packaging the SPL.
> +SPL_BINARY ?= ""
> +SPL_IMAGE ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${PV}-${PR}"
> +SPL_SYMLINK ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${MACHINE}"
> +
> do_compile () {
> unset LDFLAGS
> unset CFLAGS
> @@ -36,15 +47,33 @@ do_install () {
> install -d ${D}/boot
> install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_BINARY}
> +
> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
> + then
> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${SPL_IMAGE}
> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${SPL_BINARY}
> + fi
> }
>
> FILES_${PN} = "/boot"
> +# no gnu_hash in uboot.bin, by design, so skip QA
> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
BTW, I believe I can remove this line since I didn't see any QA warnings when building without it. I have seen versions of u-boot.inc that use the INSANE_SKIP and versions that don't so I'm not sure what the right thing is here.
>
> do_deploy () {
> - install ${S}/u-boot.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
> + install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}
> + install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
>
> cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> rm -f ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
> +
> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
> + then
> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_IMAGE}
> + rm -f ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
> + fi
> }
> +
> addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
> --
> 1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
2012-02-03 21:43 ` Maupin, Chase
@ 2012-02-03 22:53 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-03 23:26 ` Saul Wold
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-02-03 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 21:43 +0000, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> > +# no gnu_hash in uboot.bin, by design, so skip QA
> > +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
>
> BTW, I believe I can remove this line since I didn't see any QA warnings when building without it. I have seen versions of u-boot.inc that use the INSANE_SKIP and versions that don't so I'm not sure what the right thing is here.
If uboot.bin is what the name suggests (i.e. a straight binary file
rather than an ELF image) then the GNU_HASH check will be inoperative
anyway and there is no need to skip it.
I'm also not entirely sure that setting INSANE_SKIP_xx to "True" is
going to have any useful effect. If I remember right the value of that
variable is meant to be a list of checks to skip and I don't think True
is going to match against anything there.
So, all in all I think you are probably correct that this line can be
safely deleted.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
2012-02-03 21:43 ` Maupin, Chase
2012-02-03 22:53 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2012-02-03 23:26 ` Saul Wold
2012-02-06 14:13 ` Maupin, Chase
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-02-03 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 02/03/2012 01:43 PM, Maupin, Chase wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maupin, Chase
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:37 PM
>> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> Cc: Maupin, Chase
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot
>> versions
>>
>> * Add support for different suffixes found with later u-boot
>> versions which have switched from .bin to .img
>> * Allow recipes that include u-boot.inc to also package an
>> SPL if they build one.
>> * Minimum requirement is to set the SPL_BINARY value to add
>> the SPL to the u-boot package as well as into the deploy
>> directory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin<Chase.Maupin@ti.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 37
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-
>> bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> index 4180345..dcf5463 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
>> @@ -19,11 +19,22 @@ python () {
>> raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("because UBOOT_MACHINE is
>> not set")
>> }
>>
>> -UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.bin"
>> -UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.bin"
>> -UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin"
>> +# Some versions of u-boot use .bin and others use .img. By
>> default use .bin
>> +# but enable individual recipes to change this value.
>> +UBOOT_SUFFIX ?= "bin"
>> +UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
>> +UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
>> +UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
>> UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET ?= "all"
>>
>> +# Some versions of u-boot build an SPL (Second Program Loader)
>> image that
>> +# should be packaged along with the u-boot binary as well as
>> placed in the
>> +# deploy directory. For those versions they can set the following
>> variables
>> +# to allow packaging the SPL.
>> +SPL_BINARY ?= ""
>> +SPL_IMAGE ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${PV}-${PR}"
>> +SPL_SYMLINK ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${MACHINE}"
>> +
>> do_compile () {
>> unset LDFLAGS
>> unset CFLAGS
>> @@ -36,15 +47,33 @@ do_install () {
>> install -d ${D}/boot
>> install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
>> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_BINARY}
>> +
>> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
>> + then
>> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${SPL_IMAGE}
>> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${SPL_BINARY}
>> + fi
>> }
>>
>> FILES_${PN} = "/boot"
>> +# no gnu_hash in uboot.bin, by design, so skip QA
>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
>
> BTW, I believe I can remove this line since I didn't see any QA warnings when building without it. I have seen versions of u-boot.inc that use the INSANE_SKIP and versions that don't so I'm not sure what the right thing is here.
>
If you are going to set it, it should be the list of which tests to skip
rather than True.
INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "ldflags" for the gnu_hash check, need to read
insane.bbclass to figure that out.
Sau!
>>
>> do_deploy () {
>> - install ${S}/u-boot.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
>> + install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}
>> + install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
>>
>> cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
>> rm -f ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
>> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
>> +
>> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
>> + then
>> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_IMAGE}
>> + rm -f ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
>> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
>> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
>> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
>> + fi
>> }
>> +
>> addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions
2012-02-03 23:26 ` Saul Wold
@ 2012-02-06 14:13 ` Maupin, Chase
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maupin, Chase @ 2012-02-06 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saul Wold, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 5:27 PM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Cc: Maupin, Chase
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for
> newer u-boot versions
>
> On 02/03/2012 01:43 PM, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maupin, Chase
> >> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:37 PM
> >> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> Cc: Maupin, Chase
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-
> boot
> >> versions
> >>
> >> * Add support for different suffixes found with later u-boot
> >> versions which have switched from .bin to .img
> >> * Allow recipes that include u-boot.inc to also package an
> >> SPL if they build one.
> >> * Minimum requirement is to set the SPL_BINARY value to add
> >> the SPL to the u-boot package as well as into the deploy
> >> directory.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin<Chase.Maupin@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 37
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc b/meta/recipes-
> >> bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> >> index 4180345..dcf5463 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> >> @@ -19,11 +19,22 @@ python () {
> >> raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("because UBOOT_MACHINE is
> >> not set")
> >> }
> >>
> >> -UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.bin"
> >> -UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.bin"
> >> -UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin"
> >> +# Some versions of u-boot use .bin and others use .img. By
> >> default use .bin
> >> +# but enable individual recipes to change this value.
> >> +UBOOT_SUFFIX ?= "bin"
> >> +UBOOT_IMAGE ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}-${PV}-${PR}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> >> +UBOOT_BINARY ?= "u-boot.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> >> +UBOOT_SYMLINK ?= "u-boot-${MACHINE}.${UBOOT_SUFFIX}"
> >> UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET ?= "all"
> >>
> >> +# Some versions of u-boot build an SPL (Second Program Loader)
> >> image that
> >> +# should be packaged along with the u-boot binary as well as
> >> placed in the
> >> +# deploy directory. For those versions they can set the
> following
> >> variables
> >> +# to allow packaging the SPL.
> >> +SPL_BINARY ?= ""
> >> +SPL_IMAGE ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${PV}-${PR}"
> >> +SPL_SYMLINK ?= "${SPL_BINARY}-${MACHINE}"
> >> +
> >> do_compile () {
> >> unset LDFLAGS
> >> unset CFLAGS
> >> @@ -36,15 +47,33 @@ do_install () {
> >> install -d ${D}/boot
> >> install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
> >> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${UBOOT_BINARY}
> >> +
> >> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
> >> + then
> >> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${D}/boot/${SPL_IMAGE}
> >> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${D}/boot/${SPL_BINARY}
> >> + fi
> >> }
> >>
> >> FILES_${PN} = "/boot"
> >> +# no gnu_hash in uboot.bin, by design, so skip QA
> >> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = True
> >
> > BTW, I believe I can remove this line since I didn't see any QA
> warnings when building without it. I have seen versions of u-
> boot.inc that use the INSANE_SKIP and versions that don't so I'm
> not sure what the right thing is here.
> >
> If you are going to set it, it should be the list of which tests to
> skip
> rather than True.
>
> INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "ldflags" for the gnu_hash check, need to read
> insane.bbclass to figure that out.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll resend this patch without the INSANE_SKIP
>
> Sau!
>
> >>
> >> do_deploy () {
> >> - install ${S}/u-boot.bin ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
> >> + install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}
> >> + install ${S}/${UBOOT_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${UBOOT_IMAGE}
> >>
> >> cd ${DEPLOYDIR}
> >> rm -f ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
> >> ln -sf ${UBOOT_IMAGE} ${UBOOT_SYMLINK}
> >> +
> >> + if [ "x${SPL_BINARY}" != "x" ]
> >> + then
> >> + install ${S}/${SPL_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_IMAGE}
> >> + rm -f ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
> >> ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
> >> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_BINARY}
> >> + ln -sf ${SPL_IMAGE} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${SPL_SYMLINK}
> >> + fi
> >> }
> >> +
> >> addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
> >> --
> >> 1.7.0.4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-
> core
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-06 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-03 21:37 [RFC PATCH 0/1] u-boot inc: update inc file for newer u-boot versions Chase Maupin
2012-02-03 21:37 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chase Maupin
2012-02-03 21:43 ` Maupin, Chase
2012-02-03 22:53 ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-03 23:26 ` Saul Wold
2012-02-06 14:13 ` Maupin, Chase
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox