* Upstream-Status finally @ 100%
@ 2012-02-08 9:11 Saul Wold
[not found] ` <CDED78A957032E45B3239CDDA7642D1508437968@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-02-08 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie, Yocto Project Discussion,
'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'
Cc: Stewart, David C
We finally did it!
After getting some final patches yesterday, we made it to 100% with
patch Upsteam-Status.
Total Patches Files: 1243
All Upstream-Status: 1243
Fix Upstream-Status: 0
Need Upstream-Status: 0
Pending Upstream-Status: 461
This means we have 461 patches to now work their way into the Upstream
communities.
Let's work to maintain this, I will be watching incoming patches and
using a check script to verify that patches have Upstream-Status.
Thanks to all those people who worked to get Upstream-Status into their
patches.
Sau!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CDED78A957032E45B3239CDDA7642D1508437968@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>]
[parent not found: <CALZ2gZX3LMTcJ11qg5T7RAJRGpcR3fE0YB2cWMbmXPzo3Vpqqg@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100% [not found] ` <CALZ2gZX3LMTcJ11qg5T7RAJRGpcR3fE0YB2cWMbmXPzo3Vpqqg@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-02-08 17:37 ` Paul Eggleton 2012-02-08 17:45 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-02-08 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto Cc: Wold, Saul, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer, Stewart, David C, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey On Wednesday 08 February 2012 09:34:56 Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website > reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we > have no local patches to upstream projects at all? Not quite - we still have most of the patches, it's just we've now declared on each and every one whether it can be/has been upstreamed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100% [not found] ` <CALZ2gZX3LMTcJ11qg5T7RAJRGpcR3fE0YB2cWMbmXPzo3Vpqqg@mail.gmail.com> 2012-02-08 17:37 ` [yocto] " Paul Eggleton @ 2012-02-08 17:45 ` Khem Raj [not found] ` <CALZ2gZWmpnhxg=aa3qLbrpQLJqfgOn2W5WH0369rdHqyKqaD-A@mail.gmail.com> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2012-02-08 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Osier-mixon, Jeffrey Cc: Yocto Project Discussion, Wold, Saul, Stewart, David C, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey <jeffrey.osier-mixon@intel.com> wrote: > This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website > reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% of? Do we > have no local patches to upstream projects at all? it means that all patches have a field 'Upstream-Status' and for most of them it reflects the status of patch w.r.t. upstream of given package ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CALZ2gZWmpnhxg=aa3qLbrpQLJqfgOn2W5WH0369rdHqyKqaD-A@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [yocto] Upstream-Status finally @ 100% [not found] ` <CALZ2gZWmpnhxg=aa3qLbrpQLJqfgOn2W5WH0369rdHqyKqaD-A@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-02-08 18:45 ` Saul Wold 2012-02-08 21:44 ` Paul Menzel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Saul Wold @ 2012-02-08 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Osier-mixon, Jeffrey Cc: Yocto Project Discussion, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer, Stewart, David C On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > Ah, documentation :) excellent > Jefro: You can get more info about this from Mark's OE page: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines The Key thing to note on my numbers is that we have 461 patches that could potentially be up-streamed to other communities, depending the status of those communities, from active communities accepting patches to upstream source that is just download-able with no activity or maintainers. We have 1243 patches overall, which include OE Specific configuration patches and Embedded specific tweaks to various upstreams that may not be appropriate or acceptable to the upstream community. Sau! > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com > <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey > <jeffrey.osier-mixon@intel.com > <mailto:jeffrey.osier-mixon@intel.com>> wrote: > > This sounds fantastic, and I'd love to create a page on the website > > reflecting this. Just so I am clear, what exactly is this 100% > of? Do we > > have no local patches to upstream projects at all? > > it means that all patches have a field 'Upstream-Status' > and for most of them it reflects the status of patch w.r.t. upstream > of given package > > > > > -- > Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog > Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org > <http://yoctoproject.org/> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Upstream-Status finally @ 100% 2012-02-08 18:45 ` Saul Wold @ 2012-02-08 21:44 ` Paul Menzel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Paul Menzel @ 2012-02-08 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Yocto, Discussion, Stewart, David C, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --] Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2012, 10:45 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold: > On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > > Ah, documentation :) excellent Saul, thank you for the update and enforcing that requirement from the commit and patch message guidelines. > Jefro: > > You can get more info about this from Mark's OE page: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > > The Key thing to note on my numbers is that we have 461 patches that > could potentially be up-streamed to other communities, depending the > status of those communities, from active communities accepting patches > to upstream source that is just download-able with no activity or > maintainers. Emphasis should be laid on *could*. Sending these patches upstream still has to be done most of the time and most developers do not spend time with that. I hope that will improve in the future somehow. > We have 1243 patches overall, which include OE Specific configuration > patches and Embedded specific tweaks to various upstreams that may not > be appropriate or acceptable to the upstream community. Thanks, Paul [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-08 21:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-08 9:11 Upstream-Status finally @ 100% Saul Wold
[not found] ` <CDED78A957032E45B3239CDDA7642D1508437968@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CALZ2gZX3LMTcJ11qg5T7RAJRGpcR3fE0YB2cWMbmXPzo3Vpqqg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-08 17:37 ` [yocto] " Paul Eggleton
2012-02-08 17:45 ` Khem Raj
[not found] ` <CALZ2gZWmpnhxg=aa3qLbrpQLJqfgOn2W5WH0369rdHqyKqaD-A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-08 18:45 ` Saul Wold
2012-02-08 21:44 ` Paul Menzel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox