[PATCH] license.bbclass: Check if copyfile succeeded with isfile

[PATCH] license.bbclass: Check if copyfile succeeded with isfile

[Andrei Gherzan]

A cleaner way to check if copyfile suceeded is to use os.path.isfile.
In this way we can omit warns in some python versions where copyfile
return the same non-0 value even is this action is successfull.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro>
---
 meta/classes/license.bbclass |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
index c85233c..6c4a673 100644
--- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
@@ -215,9 +215,10 @@ python do_populate_lic() {
         if spdx_generic and license_source:
             # we really should copy to generic_ + spdx_generic, however, that ends up messing the manifest
             # audit up. This should be fixed in emit_pkgdata (or, we actually got and fix all the recipes)
-            ret = bb.copyfile(os.path.join(license_source, spdx_generic), os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type))
+
+            bb.copyfile(os.path.join(license_source, spdx_generic), os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type))
+            if not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type)):
             # If the copy didn't occur, something horrible went wrong and we fail out
-            if not ret:
                 bb.warn("%s for %s could not be copied for some reason. It may not exist. WARN for now." % (spdx_generic, pn))
         else:
             # And here is where we warn people that their licenses are lousy
-- 
1.7.5.4

Re: [PATCH] license.bbclass: Check if copyfile succeeded with isfile

[Saul Wold]

On 04/03/2012 04:05 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> A cleaner way to check if copyfile suceeded is to use os.path.isfile.
> In this way we can omit warns in some python versions where copyfile
> return the same non-0 value even is this action is successfull.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan<andrei@gherzan.ro>
> ---
>   meta/classes/license.bbclass |    5 +++--
>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/license.bbclass b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> index c85233c..6c4a673 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/license.bbclass
> @@ -215,9 +215,10 @@ python do_populate_lic() {
>           if spdx_generic and license_source:
>               # we really should copy to generic_ + spdx_generic, however, that ends up messing the manifest
>               # audit up. This should be fixed in emit_pkgdata (or, we actually got and fix all the recipes)
> -            ret = bb.copyfile(os.path.join(license_source, spdx_generic), os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type))
> +
> +            bb.copyfile(os.path.join(license_source, spdx_generic), os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type))
> +            if not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(os.path.join(d.getVar('LICSSTATEDIR', True), pn), "generic_" + license_type)):
>               # If the copy didn't occur, something horrible went wrong and we fail out
> -            if not ret:
>                   bb.warn("%s for %s could not be copied for some reason. It may not exist. WARN for now." % (spdx_generic, pn))
>           else:
>               # And here is where we warn people that their licenses are lousy

Merged into OE-Core

Thanks
	Sau!