From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS tunings to match README
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:10:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7F85DC.2000301@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1srkXSBHFtO__F9m9TQ=dJzfn+7kfmXoK4=tWknEdc80eg@mail.gmail.com>
Just ran a local build with the qemumips machine, this is a standard mips32 target.
From the configure line for eglibc:
/msp-lpggp1/mhatle/git/oe-core/build-mips32/tmp-eglibc/work/mips32-oe-linux/eglibc-2.13-r23+svnr15508/eglibc-2_13/libc/configure
--build=x86_64-linux --host=mips-oe-linux --target=mips-oe-linux --prefix=/usr
--exec_prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc
--sharedstatedir=/com --localstatedir=/var --libdir=/usr/lib
--includedir=/usr/include --oldincludedir=/usr/include --infodir=/usr/share/info
--mandir=/usr/share/man --disable-silent-rules --disable-dependency-tracking
--with-libtool-sysroot=/msp-lpggp1/mhatle/git/oe-core/build-mips32/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/qemumips
--enable-kernel=2.6.16 --without-cvs --disable-profile --disable-debug
--without-gd --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-add-ons=ports,nptl,libidn,ports
--with-headers=/msp-lpggp1/mhatle/git/oe-core/build-mips32/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/qemumips/usr/include
--without-selinux
The system is correctly setting the target to "mips-oe-linux".
I checked and bash is the same way.
So the canonical arch is correct, the mips32 is only the packaging arch. It was
always intended that the packaging arch be used in full on MIPS. (This will
allow us to specify mips32r2, mipsiii, mipsiv, etc as necessary if we expand the
mips tunings.)
So right now, I don't see any failure conditions with an oe-core build. (This
is oe-core as of earlier today.)
--Mark
On 4/6/12 4:30 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Mark Hatle<mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 4/4/12 11:17 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Andreas Oberritter<obi@opendreambox.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What was mipsel-oe-linux before now became mips32el-oe-linux, i.e.
>>>> tmp/work/mipsel-oe-linux now is tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux. I'm not sure
>>>> what else broke.
>>>>
>>>> Was this intentional?
>>>
>>>
>>> I dont think so. mips-*-* in general indicates 32bit BE mips and
>>> mipsel-*-* indicates
>>> 32bit LE mips so devicing mips32 and mips32el may be more explicit but
>>> is not widely
>>> used norm
>>
>>
>> If that has changed it was certainly not intentional. As Khem said the
>> expected GNU canonical archs are:
>>
>> mips-*-*
>> mipsel-*-*
>> mips64-*-*
>> mips64el-*-*
>>
>> mips32 should work, but it was not expected to have changed.
>>
>> Looking through, the GNU canonical arch should only match the above. The
>> namings in the tmp/work directory are strictly following the -package arch-
>> namings, which don't affect system configuration.
>>
>> I checked the logs from my test builds, and the mips32* reused the mips*
>> builds because the canonical arch of the configuration and such were the
>> same.
>>
>> (Looked at config.log in a couple of packages...) if you see mips32-* in
>> the config.log, let me know.
>
> see angstrom buildhistory its all filled with changes from mips -> mips32
> its unwanted.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-07 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-03 19:47 [PATCH 0/7] Cleanup and document tuning files Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] conf/machine/include/README: Add readme to explain cpu tunings Mark Hatle
2012-04-04 0:40 ` Chris Larson
2012-04-04 1:58 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] conf/machine/include: Cleanup IA tunings to match README Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] conf/machine/include: Cleanup MIPS " Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:51 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-03 19:57 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-04 22:10 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-05 4:17 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-06 17:33 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-06 21:30 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-07 0:10 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2012-04-08 21:34 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-09 15:17 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-09 15:56 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-09 16:03 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-09 20:06 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-09 20:25 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-09 20:51 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-04-09 21:00 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-09 21:03 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-09 21:21 ` ARM tunings was " Mark Hatle
2012-04-09 21:30 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-09 21:44 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-10 9:23 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-10 17:39 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-10 19:33 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-09 22:19 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] conf/machine/include: Cleanup PowerPC " Mark Hatle
2012-04-04 18:02 ` Matthew McClintock
2012-04-04 19:57 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-04 18:03 ` Matthew McClintock
2012-04-04 19:59 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] conf/machine/include: Cleanup ARM " Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] conf/machine/include: Update SH " Mark Hatle
2012-04-03 19:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] binutils: Inform binutils that armv5e really is valid! Mark Hatle
2012-04-07 8:03 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-04 16:59 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2] Cleanup and document tuning files Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7F85DC.2000301@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox