* js 185 -> js186_1.0.0
@ 2012-04-10 15:14 Andrei Gherzan
2012-04-10 15:22 ` Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Gherzan @ 2012-04-10 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]
Hello,
Have a problem while updating js to version 185. This version renames the
library in libmozjs185. What to do in order to avoid breaking packages
which need libjs? Another interesting thing is that js is now called
js185_1.0.0 which seems to be actually another package / implementation? I
will try to test this using symlinks while compiling web package.
@g
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 419 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: js 185 -> js186_1.0.0
2012-04-10 15:14 js 185 -> js186_1.0.0 Andrei Gherzan
@ 2012-04-10 15:22 ` Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Andrei Gherzan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan @ 2012-04-10 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:14:58PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> Have a problem while updating js to version 185. This version renames the
> library in libmozjs185. What to do in order to avoid breaking packages which
> need libjs? Another interesting thing is that js is now called js185_1.0.0
> which seems to be actually another package / implementation? I will try to test
> this using symlinks while compiling web package.
JS 1.8.5 is not backwards compatible! This is the reason why they renamed the
libs, you can not link older software against JS 1.8.5 without adaptions, the
new version has a new API.
Kind regards,
Jin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: js 185 -> js186_1.0.0
2012-04-10 15:22 ` Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
@ 2012-04-10 16:02 ` Andrei Gherzan
2012-04-10 16:04 ` Saul Wold
2012-04-10 19:16 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrei Gherzan @ 2012-04-10 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: Saul Wold
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1191 bytes --]
Thank you very much for this clarification.
@Saul, about upgrading js. This upgrade will break web, web-webkit and
maybe more. How do you want to solve this issue? I compiled js180.
@g
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 18:22, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
<jin@mediatomb.cc>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:14:58PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > Have a problem while updating js to version 185. This version renames the
> > library in libmozjs185. What to do in order to avoid breaking packages
> which
> > need libjs? Another interesting thing is that js is now called
> js185_1.0.0
> > which seems to be actually another package / implementation? I will try
> to test
> > this using symlinks while compiling web package.
>
> JS 1.8.5 is not backwards compatible! This is the reason why they renamed
> the
> libs, you can not link older software against JS 1.8.5 without adaptions,
> the
> new version has a new API.
>
> Kind regards,
> Jin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1686 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: js 185 -> js186_1.0.0
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Andrei Gherzan
@ 2012-04-10 16:04 ` Saul Wold
2012-04-10 19:16 ` Joshua Lock
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2012-04-10 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrei Gherzan; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 04/10/2012 09:02 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> Thank you very much for this clarification.
>
> @Saul, about upgrading js. This upgrade will break web, web-webkit and
> maybe more. How do you want to solve this issue? I compiled js180.
>
What kind of breakage?
If they need rebuilds then we bump PR to force that, but if it's API
kind of breakage, then we need to understand that and if they are fixes
for those update them also.
Sau!
> @g
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 18:22, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
> <jin@mediatomb.cc> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:14:58PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > Have a problem while updating js to version 185. This version
> renames the
> > library in libmozjs185. What to do in order to avoid breaking
> packages which
> > need libjs? Another interesting thing is that js is now called
> js185_1.0.0
> > which seems to be actually another package / implementation? I
> will try to test
> > this using symlinks while compiling web package.
>
> JS 1.8.5 is not backwards compatible! This is the reason why they
> renamed the
> libs, you can not link older software against JS 1.8.5 without
> adaptions, the
> new version has a new API.
>
> Kind regards,
> Jin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: js 185 -> js186_1.0.0
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Andrei Gherzan
2012-04-10 16:04 ` Saul Wold
@ 2012-04-10 19:16 ` Joshua Lock
2012-04-10 20:31 ` Andrei Gherzan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-04-10 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
On 10/04/12 09:02, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> Thank you very much for this clarification.
>
> @Saul, about upgrading js. This upgrade will break web, web-webkit and
> maybe more. How do you want to solve this issue? I compiled js180.
Whilst web-webkit lists js in its DEPENDS I'm not sure it's actually
required. It's not listed in the web-webkit configure.ac
We need to figure out what we want to do with web and web-webkit before
we spend too much time avoiding breaking them.
Currently neither is actively maintained but web-webkit still makes a
lot of sense IMHO.
Cheers,
Joshua
>
> @g
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 18:22, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
> <jin@mediatomb.cc> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:14:58PM +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > Have a problem while updating js to version 185. This version
> renames the
> > library in libmozjs185. What to do in order to avoid breaking
> packages which
> > need libjs? Another interesting thing is that js is now called
> js185_1.0.0
> > which seems to be actually another package / implementation? I
> will try to test
> > this using symlinks while compiling web package.
>
> JS 1.8.5 is not backwards compatible! This is the reason why they
> renamed the
> libs, you can not link older software against JS 1.8.5 without
> adaptions, the
> new version has a new API.
>
> Kind regards,
> Jin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-10 20:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-10 15:14 js 185 -> js186_1.0.0 Andrei Gherzan
2012-04-10 15:22 ` Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Andrei Gherzan
2012-04-10 16:04 ` Saul Wold
2012-04-10 19:16 ` Joshua Lock
2012-04-10 20:31 ` Andrei Gherzan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox