waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Andreas Oberritter]

Hi,

the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
bitbake since a few months, I think:

WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
WARNING: .../meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/lighttpd_1.4.30.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd

Is anybody working on fixing them? Is anybody else also seeing them,
or is this likely caused by some missing variable in my distro conf?
I am not using systemd.

Regards,
Andreas

Re: waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Samuel Stirtzel]

2012/4/17 Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>:
> Hi,
>
> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
> bitbake since a few months, I think:
>
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
> WARNING: .../meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/lighttpd_1.4.30.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>
> Is anybody working on fixing them? Is anybody else also seeing them,
> or is this likely caused by some missing variable in my distro conf?
> I am not using systemd.

Hi,
these warnings get created at recipe parsing time regardless of
whether you are using Systemd or not,
so this is not a problem of your distro conf.

Don't know if anyone already has patches for them, but I see the warnings too.

>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



-- 
Regards
Samuel

Re: [oe] waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1440 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:22:31PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
> bitbake since a few months, I think:
> 
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
> WARNING: .../meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/lighttpd_1.4.30.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd

yes they are there since systemd.bbclass rework, see
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-February/038011.html
 
> Is anybody working on fixing them? Is anybody else also seeing them,
> or is this likely caused by some missing variable in my distro conf?

Not sure if someone is working on fixing them, but all is needed is to
add ${PN}-systemd subpackage and add it to tasks which expects to get
those apps with systemd support included.

> I am not using systemd.

It's pity that those are "parsing warnings" not QA warnings when
packaging it - so that only people building them would see them, maybe 
Andreas Müller will reply why it's checked while parsing.

I'm using systemd but not cloud9|gateone|lighttpd.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [oe] waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Koen Kooi]

Op 17 apr. 2012, om 17:39 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:22:31PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
>> bitbake since a few months, I think:
>> 
>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd

The above 2 only have systemd support, so the WARNING is completely bogus and should be silenced.

Re: [oe] waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
> Op 17 apr. 2012, om 17:39 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:22:31PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
>>> bitbake since a few months, I think:
>>>
>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>
> The above 2 only have systemd support, so the WARNING is completely bogus and should be silenced.
The warning is created in case the SYSTEMD_PACKAGES = "${PN}" instead
of SYSTEMD_PACKAGES = "${PN}-systemd". Intention was to force the
separation to keep systemd stuff out of images not supporting systemd.
Problem with this: Images need to be changed e.g need to add
gateone-systemd instead of gateone.

In the RFC for systemd.bbclass I suggested to make systemd a disto
feature together with an automatic RDEPENDS for *-systemd packages.
This was commented as no go [1]. The alternate suggestion making
systemd as image feature ended up in nothing.

Another suggestion was made to separate out systemd into an own layer
[2]. Guess this is not in due to release hysteria.

I faced similar situation with gtk-iconcache runonce [3]: In case a
solution is not perfect it simply ends up in nothing although the
current situation is not acceptable.

I lost interest making gurus happy so do what you want with it

Andreas
[1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-February/037788.html
[2] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2012-April/038932.html
[3] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/019760.html

Re: [oe] waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
> Op 17 apr. 2012, om 17:39 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:22:31PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
>>> bitbake since a few months, I think:
>>>
>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>
> The above 2 only have systemd support, so the WARNING is completely bogus and should be silenced.
Another chapter of 'eat systemd or die'

Andreas

Re: [oe] waning "it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd"

[Koen Kooi]

Op 18 apr. 2012, om 11:02 heeft Andreas Müller het volgende geschreven:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Op 17 apr. 2012, om 17:39 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:22:31PM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> the following warnings keep appearing on every fresh invocation of
>>>> bitbake since a few months, I think:
>>>> 
>>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-devtools/cloud9/cloud9_0.6.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>>>> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/gateone/gateone_git.bb: it is recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as <existing-package>-systemd
>> 
>> The above 2 only have systemd support, so the WARNING is completely bogus and should be silenced.
> Another chapter of 'eat systemd or die'

At the risk of feeding the troll: I've not seen anyone contribute decent sysv scripts for those recipes. So what is your point exactly?