Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sanity.bbclass: Implement initial toolchain sanity checks
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:42:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9EF944.9080503@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a15132d9ff316a53f58764aad35bb09c5fbcf0e.1335815704.git.peter.seebach@windriver.com>

See comment inline below..

On 4/30/12 3:33 PM, Peter Seebach wrote:
> This introduces a sanity check for the toolchain, which verifies
> each tuning (including any multilibs), producing meaningful diagnostics
> for problems, and also provides some higher-level tuning features.
>
> The TUNEVALID and TUNECONFLICT/TUNECONFLICTS settings were not
> implemented, and there were some loose ends (like not knowing how
> the conflict one was spelled).  Listed one or two missing features
> in TUNEVALID, also (in a previous patch) fixed the references to
> features which didn't exist.
>
> This patch also provides a whitelisting mechanism (which is completely
> unused) to allow vendors providing prebuilt toolchain components to
> restrict tunings to those based on or compatible with a particular ABI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Seebach<peter.seebach@windriver.com>
> ---
>   meta/classes/sanity.bbclass                      |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   meta/conf/documentation.conf                     |    6 ++
>   meta/conf/machine/include/README                 |    4 +
>   meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc |    1 +
>   meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc    |    2 +-
>   meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc     |    2 +-
>   meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc     |    6 +-
>   meta/conf/machine/include/tune-c3.inc            |    2 +-
>   8 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> index 687ddeb..c77e675 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> @@ -11,6 +11,70 @@ def raise_sanity_error(msg):
>
>       %s""" % msg)
>
> +# Check a single tune for validity.
> +def check_toolchain_tune(data, tune, multilib):
> +    tune_errors = []
> +    if not tune or tune == "":
> +        return "No tuning found for %s multilib." % multilib
> +    bb.note("Sanity-checking tuning '%s' (%s) features:" % (tune, multilib))
> +    features = data.getVar("TUNE_FEATURES_tune-%s" % tune, True) or ""
> +    if features == '':
> +        return "Tuning '%s' has no defined features, and cannot be used." % tune
> +    features = features.split()
> +    valid_tunes = data.getVarFlags('TUNEVALID') or ""
> +    conflicts = data.getVarFlags('TUNECONFLICTS') or ""
> +    split_conflicts = {}
> +    for feature in features:
> +        if feature in conflicts:
> +            for conflict in conflicts[feature].split():
> +                if conflict in features:
> +                    tune_errors.append("Feature '%s' conflicts with '%s'." %
> +                        ( feature, conflict ))
> +        if feature in valid_tunes:
> +            bb.note("  %s: %s" % (feature, valid_tunes[feature]))
> +        else:

Is the above debugging?  (I suspect it is)  I suggest the following...

            if feature not in valid_tunes:
> +            tune_errors.append("Feature '%s' is not defined." % feature)
> +    whitelist = data.getVar("TUNEABI_WHITELIST", True) or ''
> +    if whitelist != '':
> +        override = data.getVar("TUNEABI_OVERRIDE", True) or ''
> +        if not override:
> +            tuneabi = data.getVar("TUNEABI_tune-%s" % tune, True) or ""
> +            if tuneabi == "":
> +                tuneabi = tune
> +            if True not in [x in whitelist.split() for x in tuneabi.split()]:
> +                tune_errors.append("Tuning '%s' (%s) cannot be used with any supported tuning/ABI." %
> +                    (tune, tuneabi))
> +    if tune_errors:
> +        return "Tuning '%s' has the following errors:\n" + '\n'.join(tune_errors)
> +
> +def check_toolchain(data):
> +    tune_error_set = []
> +    deftune = data.getVar("DEFAULTTUNE", True)
> +    tune_errors = check_toolchain_tune(data, deftune, 'default')
> +    if tune_errors:
> +        tune_error_set.append(tune_errors)
> +
> +    multilibs = data.getVar("MULTILIBS", True) or ""
> +    if multilibs != "":
> +        for pairs in [x.split(':') for x in multilibs.split()]:
> +            if pairs[0] != 'multilib':
> +                bb.warn("Got an unexpected '%s' in MULTILIBS." % pairs[0])
> +            else:
> +                if pairs[1] == 'lib':
> +                    tune_error_set.append("The multilib 'lib' was specified, but that causes parse errors.")
> +                else:
> +                    tune = data.getVar("DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-%s" % pairs[1], True)
> +                    if tune == deftune:
> +                        bb.warn("Multilib '%s' (%s) is also the default tuning." % (pairs[1], deftune))
> +                    else:
> +                        tune_errors = check_toolchain_tune(data, tune, pairs[1])
> +                    if tune_errors:
> +                        tune_error_set.append(tune_errors)
> +    if tune_error_set:
> +        return "Toolchain tunings invalid:\n" + '\n'.join(tune_error_set)
> +
> +    return ""
> +
>   def check_conf_exists(fn, data):
>       bbpath = []
>       fn = data.expand(fn)
> @@ -327,6 +391,9 @@ def check_sanity(e):
>           messages = messages + pseudo_msg + '\n'
>
>       check_supported_distro(e)
> +    toolchain_msg = check_toolchain(e.data)
> +    if toolchain_msg != "":
> +        messages = messages + toolchain_msg + '\n'
>
>       # Check if DISPLAY is set if IMAGETEST is set
>       if not data.getVar( 'DISPLAY', e.data, True ) and data.getVar( 'IMAGETEST', e.data, True ) == 'qemu':
> diff --git a/meta/conf/documentation.conf b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> index f4d6241..99c16fb 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/documentation.conf
> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ TARGET_CC_ARCH[doc] = "FIXME"
>   TARGET_FPU[doc] = "Floating point option (mostly for FPU-less systems), can be 'soft' or empty \
>   for hardware floating point instructions."
>
> +# WARNING:  Because the flags on these have semantic implecations,
> +# they must not actually be defined.
> +#TUNEVALID[doc] = "Descriptions of valid tuning features, stored as flags."
> +#TUNECONFLICTS[doc] = "List of conflicting features for a given feature."
> +TUNEABI[doc] = "A base ABI used by a given tuning, used with prebuilt binaries."
> +
>   ASSUME_PROVIDED[doc] = "List of packages (recipes actually) which are assumed to be implicitly available.\
>    These packages won't be built by bitbake."
>   ASSUME_SHLIBS[doc] = "List of shlib:package[_version] mappings. Useful for lib packages in ASSUME_PROVIDED,\
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/README b/meta/conf/machine/include/README
> index 6a3a63d..e4b59c9 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/README
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/README
> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ TUNEVALID[feature] - The<feature>  is defined with a human readable
>   explanation for what it does.  All architectural, cpu, abi, etc tuning
>   features must be defined using TUNEVALID.
>
> +TUNECONFLICTS[feature] - A list of features which conflict with<feature>.
> +New sanity checks will try to reject combinations in which a single
> +tuning ends up with features which conflict with each other.
> +
>   TUNE_FEATURES - This is automatically defined as TUNE_FEATURES_tune-<tune>.
>   See TUNE_FEATURES_tune-<tune>  for more information.
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
> index 9f03a0f..0f64562 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5-dsp.inc
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>   ARMPKGSFX_DSP = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", [ "armv5", "dsp" ], "e", "", d)}"
> +TUNEVALID[dsp] = "ARM DSP functionality"
>
>   require conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv5.inc
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> index 629960d..c90aff5 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/arch-armv7a.inc
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DEFAULTTUNE ?= "armv7a"
>
>   ARMPKGARCH ?= "armv7a"
>
> -TUNEVALID[armv7-a] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7-a"
> +TUNEVALID[armv7a] = "Enable instructions for ARMv7-a"
>   TUNE_CONFLICTS[armv7a] = "armv4 armv5 armv6 armv7"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "armv7a", "-march=armv7-a -fno-tree-vectorize", "", d)}"
>   MACHINEOVERRIDES .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "armv7a", ":armv7a", "" ,d)}"
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> index a5dae88..15f67d7 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ TUNE_ASARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", "-x32", "", d)}"
>
>   # ELF64 ABI
>   TUNEVALID[m64] = "IA32e (x86_64) ELF64 standard ABI"
> -TUNECONFLICT[m64] = "m32 mx32"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[m64] = "m32 mx32"
>   TUNE_ARCH .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m64", "${X86ARCH64}", "" ,d)}"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "m64", "-m64", "", d)}"
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc
> index 8758ecd..9f12920 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc
> @@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "bigendian", "-meb", "-mel
>
>   # ABI flags
>   TUNEVALID[o32] = "MIPS o32 ABI"
> -TUNECONFLICT[o32] = "n32 n64"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[o32] = "n32 n64"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "o32", "-mabi=32", "", d)}"
>
>   TUNEVALID[n32] = "MIPS64 n32 ABI"
> -TUNECONFLICT[n32] = "o32 n64"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[n32] = "o32 n64"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "n32", "-mabi=n32", "", d)}"
>
>   TUNEVALID[n64] = "MIPS64 n64 ABI"
> -TUNECONFLICT[n64] = "o32 n32"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[n64] = "o32 n32"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "n64", "-mabi=64", "", d)}"
>
>   # Floating point
> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-c3.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-c3.inc
> index 06fac8f..79bb67b 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-c3.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/tune-c3.inc
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>   require conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc
>
>   TUNEVALID[c3] = "VIA Cyrix III or VIA C3 specific optimizations"
> -TUNECONFLICT[c3] = "m64 mx32"
> +TUNECONFLICTS[c3] = "m64 mx32"
>   TUNE_CCARGS += "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "c3", "-march=c3 -mtune=c3", "", d)}"
>
>   AVAILTUNES += "c3"




  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-30 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 20:33 [v3] [PATCH 0/2] toolchain sanity checks, revised Peter Seebach
2012-04-30 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] tune-sh4.inc: Fix spelling of big-endian feature set Peter Seebach
2012-04-30 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] sanity.bbclass: Implement initial toolchain sanity checks Peter Seebach
2012-04-30 20:42   ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2012-04-30 20:48     ` Peter Seebach
2012-05-01 10:21       ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-01 10:25         ` Koen Kooi
2012-05-01 15:56           ` Peter Seebach
2012-05-01 10:47   ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-01 16:23     ` Peter Seebach
2012-05-01 20:17       ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-02  1:32         ` Peter Seebach
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-01 16:42 [PATCH 0/2] sanity.bblass: Initial " Peter Seebach
2012-05-01 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] sanity.bbclass: Implement initial " Peter Seebach
2012-04-27 23:51 [PATCH 0/2] sanity.bbclass: Toolchain " Peter Seebach
2012-04-27 23:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] sanity.bbclass: Implement initial toolchain " Peter Seebach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9EF944.9080503@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox